Validation of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Modified Telephone Interview for cognitive status among stroke patients

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
Baccaro_et_al-2015-Geriatrics_&_Gerontology_International.pdf (324.14 KB)
Citações na Scopus
15
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2015
DOI
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
WILEY-BLACKWELL
Autores
SEGRE, Adriana
Citação
GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, v.15, n.9, p.1118-1126, 2015
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
AimsTo examine the psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS-M) for cognitive impairment in post-stroke patients from the Stroke Mortality and Morbidity Study. MethodsThe original version of the TICS-M was translated and adapted into Brazilian-Portuguese language in 30 non-clinical subjects. After that, two trained researchers applied the TICS-M in 73 stroke participants from the Stroke Mortality and Morbidity Study; however, 12 carried out only the first evaluation and 61 participants completed the follow up: (i) personal interview 6months after stroke; (ii) telephone interview 1week after the first evaluation; and (iii) telephone interview 2weeks after the first evaluation. The reliability of the TICS-M was calculated by test-retest Pearson's correlation, intraclass correlation and Cronbach's alpha coefficient in 61 participants. Also, using data from the same participants, we carried out the analysis of the receiver operating characteristics curve using the Mini-Mental State Examination as a comparison. The structural validity of the TICS-M was assessed through principal components analysis in 103 individuals (30 non-clinical and 73 stroke patients). ResultsTest-retest reliability and intraclass correlation ranged from 0.87 to 0.97 across the evaluations. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.96. Principal components analysis extracted three meaningful domains: working memory, recall memory and orientation. The best cut-off point to screen cognitive impairment was 14 out of 15 (91.5% sensitivity, 71.4% specificity). The area under the curve was 0.89. ConclusionsThe Brazilian version of the TICS-M has been found to be a reliable, stable and homogeneous instrument to screen cognitive impairment in stroke patients. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2015; 15: 1118-1126.
Palavras-chave
cognitive impairment, dementia, stroke, validation questionnaire
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/11576
Referências
  1. Barber M, 2004, INT J GERIATR PSYCH, V19, P75, DOI 10.1002/gps.1041
  2. Beaton DE, 2000, SPINE, V25, P3186, DOI 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
  3. Beeri MS, 2003, INT J GERIATR PSYCH, V18, P381, DOI 10.1002/gps.840
  4. BERTOLUCCI PHF, 1994, ARQ NEURO-PSIQUIAT, V52, P1
  5. Brandt J., 1988, NEUROPSY NEUROPSY BE, V1, P111, DOI 10.1159/000264678
  6. Caramelli P, 1999, ARQ NEUROPSIQUIA S11, V57, P7
  7. da Costa Fabrícia Azevêdo, 2011, Rev Esc Enferm USP, V45, P1083, DOI 10.1590/S0080-62342011000500008
  8. desHaan EH, 2006, CURR OPIN NEUROL, V19, P559
  9. desJager CA, 2003, INT J GERIATR PSYCH, V18, P318
  10. DESMOND DW, 1994, INT J GERIATR PSYCH, V9, P803, DOI 10.1002/gps.930091006
  11. Fernandes TG, 2012, ARQ NEURO-PSIQUIAT, V70, P869, DOI 10.1590/S0004-282X2012001100009
  12. Fernandes TG, 2012, CAD SAUDE PUBLICA, V28, P1581, DOI 10.1590/S0102-311X2012000800016
  13. Ferrucci I, 1998, AGING CLIN EXP RES, V10, P332
  14. Fong TG, 2009, ALZHEIMERS DEMENT, V5, P492, DOI 10.1016/j.jalz.2009.02.007
  15. Gottesman RF, 2010, LANCET NEUROL, V9, P895, DOI 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70164-2
  16. Goulart AC, 2010, INT J STROKE, V5, P284, DOI 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2010.00441.x
  17. Goulart AC, 2012, INT J STROKE, V7, pE4, DOI 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00803.x
  18. Goulart AC, 2012, J STROKE CEREBROVASC, V21, P832, DOI 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.04.017
  19. Goulart AC, 2013, BMC NEUROL, V13, DOI 10.1186/1471-2377-13-51
  20. Knopman DS, 2010, NEUROEPIDEMIOLOGY, V34, P34, DOI 10.1159/000255464
  21. Kochhann R., 2010, DEMENTIA NEUROPSYCHO, V4, P35
  22. Lotufo PA, 2005, SAO PAULO MED J, V2, P3
  23. Lourenco RA, 2006, REV SAUDE PUBL, V40, P712, DOI 10.1590/s0034-89102006000500023
  24. Pendlebury ST, 2009, LANCET NEUROL, V8, P1006, DOI 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70236-4
  25. Quinn TJ, 2009, INT J STROKE, V4, P200, DOI 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2009.00271.x
  26. Sachdev PS, 2006, DEMENT GERIATR COGN, V21, P275, DOI 10.1159/000091434
  27. Seo EH, 2011, ARCH GERONTOL GERIAT, V52, P26
  28. TATEMICHI TK, 1994, J NEUROL NEUROSUR PS, V57, P202, DOI 10.1136/jnnp.57.2.202
  29. van den Berg E, 2012, J CLIN EXP NEUROPSYC, V34, P598, DOI 10.1080/13803395.2012.667066
  30. Vercambre MN, 2010, INT J GERIATR PSYCH, V25, P1142, DOI 10.1002/gps.2447

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MCM
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/IPq
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/20
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/23
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/27
Carregar mais