DETECTING DISSONANCE IN CLINICAL AND RESEARCH WORKFLOWS FOR TRANSLATIONAL PSYCHIATRIC REGISTRIES
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Citações na Scopus
Tipo de produção
conferenceObject
Data de publicação
2012
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
IADIS-INT ASSOC DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION SOCIETY
Autores
Citação
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IADIS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE E-HEALTH 2012, p.273-275, 2012
Resumo
Data capture process is an important step in health care research, but it often receives little attention on research design number of flaws. To the best of our knowledge, no previous studies have developed standards that would allow for the comparison of workflow models of clinical and research activities and the improvement of the data collection process. In the present study we developed workflow models for a translational research study in psychiatry and for the clinic where it was implemented. Models were used for workflow comparison and identification of dissonances between both, qualitative standards and a corresponding taxonomy arose and workflow re-engineering was proposed and implemented.
Palavras-chave
Workflow, UML, Clinical Research, Direct Observations, Standards
Referências
- Carvalho E., 2011, PLOS ONE UNPUB
- de Carvalho ECA, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0013893
- Gurland B, 2010, DIS COLON RECTUM, V53, P1168, DOI 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181d87468
- Holzinger A, 2011, J BIOMED INFORM, V44, P968, DOI 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.07.003
- Khan Sharib A, 2008, AMIA Annu Symp Proc, P363
- Khan Sharib A, 2006, AMIA Annu Symp Proc, P419
- Nguyen Lam, 2006, Source Code Biol Med, V1, P7, DOI 10.1186/1751-0473-1-7