Social participation in occupational therapy: what are we talking about?

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_SILVA_Social_participation_in_occupational_therapy_what_are_we_2019_eng.PDF (1.23 MB)
art_SILVA_Social_participation_in_occupational_therapy_what_are_we_2019_por.PDF (1.25 MB)
Citações na Scopus
10
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2019
Editora
CUBA EDITORA
DOI
Indexadores
SciELO
Scopus
Web of Science
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Autores
SILVA, Ana Cristina Cardoso da
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
CADERNOS BRASILEIROS DE TERAPIA OCUPACIONAL-BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, v.27, n.4, p.858-872, 2019
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
This article presents the results of a systematic review, which aimed to investigate how researchers of Brazilian occupational therapy conceptualize social participation and which theoretical references are used or produced in the area to discuss this concept. The review consisted of searching the bibliographic productions of Brazilian occupational therapists available online in journals of the area, in LILACS and SciELO. There were 481 articles identified and, based on the exploratory and selective reading, 31 articles were considered for descriptive, critical and interpretive analysis, dealing with exploratory research and reflectiontessay and case studies, experience reports, and bibliographic review. Researchers presented plurality in the definition and understanding of social participation; however, there's still no clarity about these different ways of approaching the concept, which can be justified by the inexistence or lack of a better theoretical-conceptual foundation. Other teens, such as ""participation""; ""sociocultural participation""; ""community participation"" and ""political participation"" were used as synonyms of social participation. This variation in the use of terms also resulted from the different fields of action in which the studies were carried out and from the theoretical references used. Some articles did not define social participation, even if the concept was the subject of research and/or analysis. However, they used references that help understand how their authors understand social participation. As in other fields of knowledge, occupational therapy presents a multiplicity of definitions or notions of the concept that is influenced by different sciences and disciplines, which also reveals consensus and divergence. This article presents the results of a systematic review, which aimed to investigate how researchers of Brazilian occupational therapy conceptualize social participation and which theoretical references are used or produced in the area to discuss this concept. The review consisted of searching the bibliographic productions of Brazilian occupational therapists available online in journals of the area, in LILACS and SciELO. There were 481 articles identified and, based on the exploratory and selective reading, 31 articles were considered for descriptive, critical and interpretive analysis, dealing with exploratory research and reflection/essay and case studies, experience reports, and bibliographic review. Researchers presented plurality in the definition and understanding of social participation; however, there's still no clarity about these different ways of approaching the concept, which can be justified by the inexistence or lack of a better theoretical-conceptual foundation. Other teens, such as ""participation""; ""sociocultural participation""; ""community participation"" and ""political participation"" were used as synonyms of social participation. This variation in the use of terms also resulted from the different fields of action in which the studies were carried out and from the theoretical references used. Some articles did not define social participation, even if the concept was the subject of research and/or analysis. However, they used references that help understand how their authors understand social participation. As in other fields of knowledge, occupational therapy presents a multiplicity of definitions or notions of the concept that is influenced by different sciences and disciplines, which also reveals consensus and divergence.
Abstract This article presents the results of a systematic review, which aimed to investigate how researchers of Brazilian occupational therapy conceptualize social participation and which theoretical references are used or produced in the area to discuss this concept. The review consisted of searching the bibliographic productions of Brazilian occupational therapists available online in journals of the area, in LILACS and SciELO. There were 481 articles identified and, based on the exploratory and selective reading, 31 articles were considered for descriptive, critical and interpretive analysis, dealing with exploratory research and reflection/essay and case studies, experience reports, and bibliographic review. Researchers presented plurality in the definition and understanding of social participation; however, there’s still no clarity about these different ways of approaching the concept, which can be justified by the inexistence or lack of a better theoretical-conceptual foundation. Other terms, such as “participation”; “sociocultural participation”; “community participation” and “political participation” were used as synonyms of social participation. This variation in the use of terms also resulted from the different fields of action in which the studies were carried out and from the theoretical references used. Some articles did not define social participation, even if the concept was the subject of research and/or analysis. However, they used references that help understand how their authors understand social participation. As in other fields of knowledge, occupational therapy presents a multiplicity of definitions or notions of the concept that is influenced by different sciences and disciplines, which also reveals consensus and divergence.
Palavras-chave
Occupational Therapy, Concept Formation, Social Participation, Knowledge, Systematic Review, Terapia Ocupacional, Formação de Conceito, Participação Social, Conhecimento, Revisão Sistemática
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/34389
Referências
  1. Alves I, 2013, CAD TER OCUP UFSCAR, V21, P325, DOI 10.4322/cto.2013.034
  2. AMERICAN OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION-AOTA, 2015, REV TERAPIA OCUPACIO, V26, P1
  3. Aoki M, 2013, CAD TER OCUP UFSCAR, V21, P391, DOI 10.4322/cto.2013.040
  4. BARROS D. D., 2016, TERAPIA OCUPACIONAL, P83
  5. BARROS D. D., 2007, TERAPIA OCUPACIONAL, P354
  6. Campos Célia Maria Sivalli, 2005, Cad. Saúde Pública, V21, P1260, DOI 10.1590/S0102-311X2005000400029
  7. Cole MB, 2011, SOCIAL PARTICIPATION IN OCCUPATIONAL CONTEXTS: IN SCHOOLS, CLINICS, AND COMMUNITIES, P1
  8. CORDOBA A. G, 2011, CONSTRUCICION IDENTI
  9. de Almeida DT, 2011, INTERFACE-BOTUCATU, V15, P299
  10. DECARLO M. M. R. P., 2001, TERAPIA OCUPACIONAL, P19
  11. DIAS E. G, 2014, REV TER OCUP, V25, P225, DOI [10.11606/issn.2238-6149.v25i3p225-232, DOI 10.11606/ISSN.2238-6149.V25I3P225-232]
  12. ESCOREL S., 2012, POLITICAS SISTEMA SA, P853
  13. FERREIRA N. R., 2018, REV INTERINSTITUCION, V2, P745
  14. FRANCISCO B. R, 2001, TERAPIA OCUPACIONAL, P51
  15. GALHEIGO S. M, 2012, POLITICS OCCUPATION, P128
  16. Galheigo SM, 2018, CAD BRAS TER OCUP, V26, P723, DOI [10.4322/2526-8910.ctoao1773, 10.4322/2526-8910.ctoAO1773]
  17. Goncalo CS, 2012, BRASILIA MED, V49, P104
  18. HOUAISS A., 2004, MINIDICIONARIO HOUAI
  19. JACOBS K., 2006, DICIONARIO TERAPIA O
  20. LARSON E., 2005, WILLARD SPACKMAN TER, P16
  21. LIMA E. M. F. A, 2009, REV TERAPIA OCUPACIO, V20, P143, DOI 10.11606/issn.2238-6149.v20i3p143-148
  22. LOPES R. E., 2016, TERAPIA OCUPACIONAL, P29
  23. MARTINS S. R. O, 2016, INTERACOES-CAMPO GRA, V3, P51
  24. MIDGLEY J., 1986, COMMUNITY PARTICIPAT
  25. Moher D, 2009, ANN INTERN MED, V151, P264, DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
  26. NICACIO M. F., 1994, THESIS, P174
  27. Oliver Fátima Corrêa, 2004, Interface (Botucatu), V8, P275, DOI 10.1590/S1414-32832004000200007
  28. ORGANIZACAO MUNDIAL DA SAUDE-OMS, 2004, CIF CLASS INT FUNC I
  29. PADUA E. M. M., 2002, METODOLOGIA PESQUISA
  30. PIMENTEL A. M., 2011, REV TERAPIA OCUPACIO, V22, P110, DOI 10.11606/issn.2238-6149.v22i2p110-116
  31. Silva A.S, 2016, THESIS
  32. Silva CR, 2015, CAD TER OCUP UFSCAR, V23, P131, DOI 10.4322/0104-4931.ctoAO513
  33. SOARES L. B. T., 1991, TERAPIA OCUPACIONAL
  34. SOSA E., 2015, REV CHILENA TERAPIA, V15, P45
  35. STOTZ E. N., 2009, DICIONARIO EDUCACAO, P293
  36. Teixeira M. L., 2009, SOCIOLOGIAS, V11, P218
  37. Toldra RC, 2016, CAD TER OCUP UFSCAR, V24, P723, DOI 10.4322/0104-4931.ctoAO0641
  38. TOWNSEND E., 2005, OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, P494
  39. WILCOCK A, 1993, J OCCUP SCI, V1, P17, DOI 10.1080/14427591.1993.9686375
  40. Nogueira LDZ, 2018, CAD BRAS TER OCUP, V26, P859, DOI [10.4322/2526-8910.ctoao1743, 10.4322/2526-8910.ctoAO1743]

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MFT
Carregar mais