NIVALDO ALONSO
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Departamento de Cirurgia, Faculdade de Medicina - Docente
Instituto Central, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
LIM/04 - Laboratório de Microcirurgia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Líder
Instituto Central, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
LIM/04 - Laboratório de Microcirurgia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Líder
2 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
- Versatility of the buccinator myomucosal flap in atypical palate reconstructions(2014) FRANCO, Diogo; ROCHA, Diogenes; ARNAUT JR., Marcio; FREITAS, Renato; ALONSO, NivaldoInitially described for the treatment of cleft palate, the anatomical bases of the buccinator myomucosal flap were described by Bozola et al. (1989). A meticulous search found several reports of its use for the correction of post-palatoplasty oronasal fistulas, with only a few reports of its use for other palate-related pathologies. A retrospective analysis was undertaken of patients treated by the Plastic Surgery Units at the Rio de Janeiro Federal University Hospital (HU-UFRJ) and the Sao Paulo University Hospital (HC-USP), suffering from palatal lesions not associated with a cleft palate and treated through the use of buccinator myomucosal flaps. The average age was 47 years, with 70% of the patients being male. Assorted aetiologies were noted for palatal defects. When there was significant damage to the soft palate, a superior base pharyngeal flap was used. Of this total, in 71% of the cases only the buccinator myomucosal flap was used. In all cases, the flaps were unilateral, adequately covering the defects in question. The buccinator myomucosal flap is a good option for reconstructing medium to large palate defects, as it is a flap with good vascularization and dimension, in addition to an ample arc of rotation, with primary closure of the donor site, without adding significant morbidity.
- Macrostomia A Spectrum of Deformity(2014) BUONOCORE, Samuel; BROER, P. Niclas; WALKER, Marc E.; FREITAS, Renato da Silva; FRANCO, Diogo; ALONSO, NivaldoBackground Macrostomia is a rare facial cleft, with an incompletely described pathogenesis. This series highlights cases of isolated macrostomia presenting with several distinct phenotypes. We examine phenotypic differences in macrostomia patients, to further elucidate the etiopathogenesis. Materials and Methods We performed a retrospective review of macrostomia patients evaluated during a 10-year period. Patient demographics and clinical features are reported. Results We identified 25 macrostomia patients (13M/12F). Right-sided macrostomia occurred in 15, left-sided macrostomia occurred in 6, and bilateral macrostomia occurred in 4 patients. Of the bilateral cases, 100% existed in isolation of craniofacial microsomia (CFM) or other craniofacial abnormalities. Twelve patients presented with macrostomia in isolation of CFM; in this subgroup, the male-to-female ratio was 1:1. Bilateral macrostomia was present in 33% of patients. Unilateral macrostomia occurred more often on the right (5:2). Phenotypes included simple unilateral or bilateral macrostomia (67%), macrostomia associated with severe diastasis of the cheek musculature (8%), macrostomia associated with lateral facial clefts (17%), and diastasis of cheek musculature without significant macrostomia (8%). Conclusions Macrostomia seen in isolation of CFM presents in phenotypically distinct forms. It is unlikely that a single mechanism is responsible for this range of phenotypes. We believe that both intrauterine trauma and failure of fusion of the mandibular and maxillary processes secondary to an aberration in FGF8 function are responsible. Additionally, diastasis of facial musculature may result from delayed fusion and subsequent decreased mesodermal penetration of the mandibular and maxillary processes.