NIVALDO ALONSO
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Departamento de Cirurgia, Faculdade de Medicina - Docente
Instituto Central, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
LIM/04 - Laboratório de Microcirurgia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Líder
Instituto Central, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
LIM/04 - Laboratório de Microcirurgia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Líder
2 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
- Does different cranial suture synostosis influence orbit volume and morphology in Apert syndrome?(2022) LU, X.; FORTE, A. J.; ALPEROVICH, M.; ALONSO, N.; PERSING, J. A.This study was performed to compare the orbital and peri-orbital morphological variations in Apert syndrome patients with different cranial vault suture synostosis, so as to provide an anatomic basis for individualized surgical planning. Computed tomography scans of 57 unoperated Apert syndrome patients and 59 controls were subgrouped as follows: type I, bilateral coronal synostosis; type II, pansynostosis; type III, perpendicular combinations of cranial vault suture synostoses. Orbit bony cavity volume was significantly reduced in type I and type II, by 19% (P < 0.001) and 24% (P < 0.001), respectively. However, the reduction of orbital cavity volume in type III did not reach statistical significance. Globe volume projection beyond the orbital rim, however, increased by 76% (P < 0.001) in type III, versus an increase of 54% (P < 0.001) in type I and 53% (P < 0.001) in type II, due to different ethmoid and sphenoid bone malformations. Maxillary bone volume was only significantly reduced in type I bicoronal synostosis (by 24%, P = 0.048). Both type I and type II developed relatively less zygoma and sphenoid bone volume. Different cranial vault suture synostoses have varied influence on peri-orbital development in Apert syndrome. Instead of mitigating the abnormalities resulting from bicoronal synostosis in type I, additional midline suture synostosis worsens the exorbitism due to a more misshaped ethmoid.
- Growth patterns of the airway in Crouzon syndrome patients with different types of cranial vault suture synostosis(2021) LU, X.; FORTE, A. J.; WILSON, A.; PARK, K. E.; ALLAM, O.; ALPEROVICH, M.; STEINBACHER, D. M.; TONELLO, C.; ALONSO, N.; PERSING, J. A.The severity of obstructive respiratory difficulty varies among affected Crouzon syndrome patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between the restricted airway volume in Crouzon syndrome and the associated type of cranial vault suture synostosis. Computed tomography scans of 68 unoperated Crouzon syndrome patients and 89 control subjects were subgrouped into four types: type I, bilateral coronal synostosis; type II, sagittal synostosis; type III, pansynostosis; type IV, perpendicular combinations of synostoses. Measurements were made using Mimics software. Of type I Crouzon patients, 42% had a restricted nasal airway (P = 0.002), while the pharyngeal airway volume was not significantly reduced. Type II Crouzon patients grew normal segmental airway volumes. Crouzon patients of type III developed simultaneously reduced nasal and pharyngeal airway volumes in infancy, by 38% (P = 0.034) and 51% (P = 0.014), respectively. However, the nasal airway achieved a normal volume by 2 years of age without any intervention, while the pharyngeal airway remained significantly reduced up to 6 years of age, by 42% (P = 0.013), compared to controls. Type IV Crouzon patients developed a reduced nasal airway volume (32%, P = 0.048) and a non-significant restricted pharyngeal airway (18%, P = 0.325). Airway compromise in Crouzon syndrome is variable when associated with different craniosynostosis fusion patterns. Type II (sagittal synostosis) Crouzon patients grew a normal nasopharyngeal airway volume. Those with types I (bicoronal synostosis) and IV (perpendicular synostoses) had significantly restricted nasal airways and a tendency towards a reduced pharyngeal volume. Type III (pansynostosis) Crouzon infants had the worst restriction of both airways, although there was some improvement with age.