CARLOS ALFREDO BATAGELLO
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto Central, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
4 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 4 de 4
- One week pre-operative oral antibiotics for percutaneous nephrolithotomy reduce risk of infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis(2023) DANILOVIC, Alexandre; TALIZIN, Thalita Bento; TORRICELLI, Fabio Cesar Miranda; MARCHINI, Giovanni S.; BATAGELLO, Carlos; VICENTINI, Fabio C.; NAHAS, Willaim C.; MAZZUCCHI, EduardoPurpose: The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy of extended dose of preoperative antibiotics to reduce infectious risk in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).Materials and Methods: A literature search for prospective case-control studies or randomized controlled trials was done. PICO framework was used.Population: adult patients that underwent to PCNL; Intervention: extended dose preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis before PCNL; Control: short dose preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis befo-re PCNL; and Outcome: systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) or sepsis, fe-ver after PCNL and positive intraoperative urine and stone culture. This meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO database under the number: CRD42022359589.Results: Three RCT and two prospective studies (475 patients) were included. SIRS/ sepsis outcome was retrieved from all studies included. Seven days preoperative oral antibiotics for PCNL was a protective factor for developing SIRS/sepsis (OR 0.366, 95% CI 0.234 -0.527, p < 0.001). There was no statistical association between seven-day use of antibiotics and fever (OR 0.592, 95% CI 0.147 - 2.388, p = 0.462). Patients who received seven days preoperative antibiotics had lower positive intraoperative urine culture (OR 0.284, 95% CI 0.120 - 0.674, p = 0.004) and stone culture (OR 0.351, 95% CI 0.185 - 0.663, p = 0.001) than the control group.Conclusion: one week of prophylactic oral antibiotics based on local bacterial sensi-tivity pattern plus a dose of intravenous antibiotics at the time of surgery in patients undergoing PCNL reduces the risk of infection.
- The Effect of Pre-Stenting on Bleeding-Related Complications Following Ureteroscopy in Patients on Anticoagulation or Antiplatelet Therapy(2023) BERGER, Jonathan H.; DIPINA, Thomas; ALSHARA, Luay; BATAGELLO, Carlos; HEIMAN, Joshua; LARGE, Tim; SIVALINGAM, Sri; SUR, Roger L.; KRAMBECK, Amy; BECHIS, Seth K.Introduction: The American Urological Association guidelines state that continuing anticoagulant (AC) and antiplatelet (AP) agents during ureteroscopy (URS) is safe. Through a multi-institutional retrospective study, we sought to determine whether pre-stenting in patients on AP or AC was associated with fewer URS bleeding-related complications.Methods: A series of 8614 URS procedures performed across three institutions (April 2010 to September 2017) was electronically reviewed for AC/AP use at time of URS. Records indicating AC or AP use at time of URS were then manually reviewed to characterize intraoperative and 30-day postoperative (intraoperative bleeding, postoperative hematuria, emergency department visits, hospital readmission, unplanned reoperation, phone calls, and other minor 30-day complications).Results: A total of 293 identified URS procedures were completed on patients on AC/AP therapy-112 cases were on AC only (38 were pre-stented), 158 on AP only (51 pre-stented), and 23 on both AP and AC (8 pre-stented). Patient characteristics and comorbidities were similar between the pre-stented and non-pre-stented groups. For AC and AP subjects, pre-stenting did not decrease the composite risk of bleeding complications (10.3% pre-stent vs 12.2% non-prestent, p = 0.6). Pre-stented patients did have a significantly lower likelihood of requiring an unplanned reoperation (1.0% vs 5.6%, p = 0.04). In the subgroup of patients on AP alone, pre-stented patients had significantly fewer episodes of intraoperative bleeding (0% vs 9%, p = 0.04), unplanned reoperations (0% vs 6.5%, p = 0.02), and 30-day complications (14% vs 27%, p = 0.05). In the subgroup of patients on AC alone, there were no significant differences in outcomes based on stent status.Conclusions: In this multi-institutional study, we found that pre-stenting before URS was not associated with fewer bleeding complications. However, pre-stenting appeared to be associated with improved outcomes for those patients on AP therapy. These results suggest a need for prospective studies to clarify the role of pre-stenting for URS.
- Reply by Authors(2022) PERRELLA, R.; VICENTINI, F. C.; PARO, E. D.; TORRICELLI, F. C. M.; MARCHINI, G. S.; DANILOVIC, A.; BATAGELLO, C. A.; MOTA, P. K. V.; FERREIRA, D. B.; COHEN, D. J.; MURTA, C. B.; CLARO, J. F. A.; GIUSTI, G.; MONGA, M.; NAHAS, W. C.; SROUGI, M.; MAZZUCCHI, E.
- Comparison of the outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of kidney stones: a matched-pair analysis(2022) RODRIGUES, Jose Eduardo Castro Matheus; VICENTINI, Fabio Carvalho; DANILOVIC, Alexandre; MARCHINI, Giovanni Scala; TORRICELLI, Fabio Cesar Miranda; BATAGELLO, Carlos Alfredo; MAZZUCCHI, Eduardo; NAHAS, William CarlosOBJECTIVE: Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a recent advancement in the field of kidney stone treatment; however, its role has not been completely established. We aimed to compare the outcomes of initial Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy.METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive mini-percutaneous procedures was performed. Inclusion criteria were as follows: all percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures performed with an access sheath up to 24Fr, kidney stone burdens up to 1550 mm3; and the presence of postoperative computed tomography (for control). The data collected for Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures were paired 1:2 with patients treated with flexible ureteroscopy for stones between 100 and 1550 mm3, and with postoperative computed tomography for control. A 14Fr Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy set was used. The stone-free rate was defined as the absence of fragments on the control computed tomography, whereas success was limited to 2-mm residual fragments. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 19.RESULTS: A total of 63 patients met the inclusion criteria (42 with flexible ureteroscopy and 21 with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy). Demographic data were comparable. The stone-free rate and success were similar between the groups (76.2 vs. 66.7%, p=0.42 and 90.5 vs. 85.7%, p=0.57). The complication rate was also similar (26.1 vs. 9.6%, p=0.188), but Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy had longer hospitalization and fluoroscopy time (p=0.001 in both).CONCLUSIONS: Our initial study of Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy showed that it is a promising procedure, with outcomes similar to flexible ureteroscopy, but with higher inpatient numbers and fluoroscopy times. A larger study population size and better equipment may improve the outcomes of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy.