RICARDO GHELMAN
Índice h a partir de 2011
4
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
LIM/26 - Laboratório de Pesquisa em Cirurgia Experimental, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
10 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 10 de 10
bookPart Pediatria integrativa(2021) GHELMAN, Ricardo; PEREIRA, Priscilla Araújo Duprat de Britto; MEIRA, Lara Vieira da SilvabookPart Medicamentos dinamizados(2021) QUARESMA, Carla Holandino; BATISTA, João Vitor da Costa; OLIVEIRA, Adriana Passos; VIRIATO, Ezequiel Paulo; MORERA, Marcelo Camilo; GHELMAN, Ricardo; ROCHA, Leandro MachadobookPart Panorama global da pesquisa em medicina e saúde integrativa(2021) GHELMAN, Ricardo; SCHVEITZER, Mariana Cabral; ABDALA, Carmen Verônica Mendes; NUNES, Gelza Matos; PORTELLA, Caio Fábio Schlechta- Beyond the Standard of Care: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of an Implemented Integrative Therapeutic Care Program in a Brazilian Pediatric Oncology Unit(2021) TROENDLE, Marc; STRITTER, Wiebke; ODONE, Vicente; PERON, Karina; GHELMAN, Ricardo; SEIFERT, GeorgIntroduction: This article examines the feedback of health care providers within the implementation of an integrative care project in a clinic for pediatric oncology in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Since 2017, the project has implemented external anthroposophic therapies in the activities of daily nursing. The objective is to evaluate how the project evolved and what impact it had on the daily operation of the hospital. A special focus emphasizes the perspective of study nurses. Materials and Methods: Twelve qualitative semistructured interviews were conducted. Audio files were transcribed, translated to German, and underwent a MAXQDA software-assisted analysis. Using a thematic approach, coherent cross-case topics were defined. Results: Three main topics emerged from analysis of the data. (1) The implementation and its effects on daily patient care demonstrated positive outcomes in patients and were well accepted with minimal changes in daily activities. (2) The perspective of study nurses showed a large motivation due to beneficial and stress-relieving effects of the application and a growing patient-health care provider relationship. (3) Problems and aspirations for improvement were the lack of time and the urge to make the project grow in the future. Conclusion: Not only patients but also health care providers seem to benefit from integrative methods. They have the potential to improve the working atmosphere and to strengthen relations between patients, caregivers, and family members. General feedback was positive and acceptance in the team arose over time when beneficial effects became visible.
conferenceObject Discovering Resources Beyond the Standard of Care - Impact of an integrative care program for children with cancer in Brazil(2021) MARC, Troendle; WIEBKE, Stritter; VICENTE, Odone; KARINA, Peron; RICARDO, Ghelman; GEORG, SeifertbookPart Medicina antroposófica(2021) GHELMAN, Ricardo; BENEVIDES, Iracema de Almeida; HOSOMI, Jorge KioshibookPart Oncologia integrativa: uma abordagem centrada na pessoa(2021) COSTA, Paola Tôrres; GHELMAN, Ricardo; CHAMON, ReginaconferenceObject Discovering Resources Beyond the Standard of Care - Impact of an integrative care program for children with cancer in Brazil(2021) MARC, Troendle; WIEBKE, Stritter; VICENTE, Odone; KARINA, Peron; RICARDO, Ghelman; GEORG, Seifertarticle 9 Citação(ões) na Scopus Cancer-Related Fatigue Outcome Measures in Integrative Oncology: Evidence for Practice and Research Recommendations(2022) GENTILE, Danielle; BEELER, Dori; WANG, Xin Shelley; BEN-ARYE, Eran; ZICK, Suzanna; BAO, Ting; CARLSON, Linda E.; GHELMAN, Ricardo; MASTER, Viraj A.; TRIPATHY, Debu; ZHI, W. IrisCancer-related fatigue (CRF) is one of the most common symptoms across the cancer continuum and is often underreported and undertreated. Defined as a distressing, persistent, subjective sense of tiredness or exhaustion related to cancer or its treatment, CRF includes physical, emotional, cognitive, and spiritual dimensions. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are the most widely used tool to screen for and assess fatigue and the associated negative impacts on quality of life. However, selecting subjective CRF measures can be complex. This has resulted in the availability of and inconsistent use of numerous PROs, limiting the ability to cross-compare outcomes clinically and within research. To address this, the PROs that are most widely reported in the literature are recommended to support the standardization of a core set of validated measures. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network single-item tool for clinical significance is recommended for quick use in clinical environments; the Brief Fatigue Inventory allows for fast, easy, helpful cutoffs on severity threshold for triage, and measures both severity and interference with daily functioning; while the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory allows for multisymptomatic assessment. In addition, a fundamental consideration for any PRO use is the administrative burden on the patient and clinician. In this review, we aim to summarize current, validated PROs specific to CRF to aid clinicians and researchers in patient care and in study design and implementation. We conclude with suggestions for future directions in CRF research that can increase the possibility for long-term impact on future guidelines of fatigue management.bookPart Anexo- Websites de instituições de referência em medicina integrativa(2021) GHELMAN, Ricardo; ROHDE, Ciro Blujus dos Santos