MARCO VINICIUS LOSSO LONGO

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
4
Lattes
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais

Filtros

Limpar filtros

Configurações

Autor: TEIXEIRA, Nuberto Hopfgartner ×

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
  • article 4 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Combined polyglycolic acid tube and autografting versus autografting or polyglycolic acid tube alone. A comparative study of peripheral nerve regeneration in rats
    (2015) COSTA, Marcio Paulino; TEIXEIRA, Nuberto Hopfgartner; LONGO, Marco Vinicius Losso; GEMPERLI, Rolf; COSTA, Heloisa Juliana Zabeu Rossi
    PURPOSE: To compare sciatic nerve regeneration in rats using three different techniques of repair. METHODS: Fifteen isogonics rats were divided into three groups according to the method used to repair a 5-mm long defect created in the sciatic nerve: autogenous graft (Group A), polyglycolic acid tube (PGAt) (Group B), and of the association of PGAt with the graft (Group C). Histological analysis, regenerated myelinated axon number count and functional analysis were used to compare after six weeks. RESULTS: There was no difference in fiber diameter and degree of myelinization presented by Groups A, B and C. Group B presented the lowest number of regenerated axons. The groups did not display any significant functional difference after walking track analysis (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: No differences between the three groups in terms of functional recovery, although there were histological differences among them.
  • article 15 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    COMPARISONS OF THE RESULTS OF PERIPHERAL NERVE DEFECT REPAIR WITH FIBRIN CONDUIT AND AUTOLOGOUS NERVE GRAFT: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY IN RATS
    (2016) LONGO, Marco Vinicius Losso; FARIA, Jose Carlos Marques De; ISAAC, Cesar; NEPOMUCENO, Andre Coelho; TEIXEIRA, Nuberto Hopfgartner; GEMPERLI, Rolf
    Introduction: The standard treatment for nerve defects is nerve autograft. There is no conduit available that provides the same regenerative capacity of nerve autograft. This study evaluated the histological and functional recovery of nerve defects treated with fibrin conduit in comparison to the nerve autograft, in a rat model. Method: A sciatic nerve injury model (10-mm defect) was performed in 20 Wistar rats, nerve defect was reconstructed using a fibrin conduit (n=10). A nerve autograft was used as control (n=10). The walking behavior was measured by footprint analysis at 4, 8, and 12 weeks and sciatic function index was determined. After 12 weeks, histological analysis was performed to evaluate the regenerated nerve and measured axonal density. The triceps surae muscle weight was also evaluated. Results: The fibrin conduit group showed less improvement in walking behavior compared to nerve autograft (-53 +/- 2 vs. -36 +/- 2; P<0.001 at 12 weeks). The fibrin conduit group presented axonal density of 40.0 axons/10.995 mu m2 and the nerve autograft group had 67.2 axons/10.995 mu m2 (P<0.001). The triceps surae muscle weight ratio of the fibrin conduit group was 41 +/- 3% versus 71 +/- 4% of the nerve autograft group (P<0.001). Conclusion: The fibrin conduit could be used for nerve reconstruction following peripheral nerve injury in the rat model. However, the functional recovery in the fibrin conduit repair group was worse than that in nerve autograft group and the nerve repair with the fibrin conduit has less myelinated fibers when compared to the repair with nerve autograft. (C) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.