ANGELITA HABR GAMA
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Faculdade de Medicina - Docente
19 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 10 de 19
- Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for rectal cancer: current status and perspectives for the surgeon(2017) ARAUJO, Sergio Eduardo Alonso; JULIAO, Guilherme Pagin Sao; HABR-GAMA, Angelita; VAILATI, Bruna Borba; PEREZ, Rodrigo OlivaModern management of rectal cancer has become increasingly complex over the last decades. The introduction of neoadjuvant chemoradiation to the treatment strategy of locally advanced and distal rectal cancers has added numerous variables that may ultimately affect final surgical or even non-surgical management. Specific chemoradiation regimens, intervals after neoadjuvant treatment completion and tools for the assessment of tumor response may all affect final surgical decision and should be interpreted with care. The present study attempts to provide a review of commonly used neoadjuvant chemoradiation regimens, specific intervals and final surgical or non-surgical management of rectal cancer in current clinical practice.
- Extralevator Abdominal Perineal Excision Versus Standard Abdominal Perineal Excision: Impact on Quality of the Resected Specimen and Postoperative Morbidity(2017) HABR-GAMA, Angelita; JULIO, Guilherme P. Sao; MATTACHEO, Adrian; CAMPOS-LOBATO, Luiz Felipe de; ALEMAN, Edgar; VAILATI, Bruna B.; GAMA-RODRIGUES, Joaquim; PEREZ, Rodrigo OlivaBackground Abdominal perineal excision (APE) has been associated with a high risk of positive circumferential resection margin (CRM+) and local recurrence rates in the treatment of rectal cancer. An alternative extralevator approach (ELAPE) has been suggested to improve the quality of resection by avoiding coning of the specimen decreasing the risk of tumor perforation and CRM+. The aim of this study is to compare the quality of the resected specimen and postoperative complication rates between ELAPE and ""standard"" APE. Methods All patients between 1998 and 2014 undergoing abdominal perineal excision for primary or recurrent rectal cancer at a single Institution were reviewed. Between 1998 and 2008, all patients underwent standard APE. In 2009 ELAPE was introduced at our Institution and all patients requiring APE underwent this alternative procedure (ELAPE). The groups were compared according to pathological characteristics, specimen quality (CRM status, perforation and failure to provide the rectum and anus in a single specimen-fragmentation) and postoperative morbidity. Results Fifty patients underwent standard APEs, while 22 underwent ELAPE. There were no differences in CRM+ (10.6 vs. 13.6%; p = 0.70) or tumor perforation rates (8 vs. 0%; p = 0.30) between APE and ELAPE. However, ELAPE were less likely to result in a fragmented specimen (42 vs. 4%; p = 0.002). Advanced pT-stage was also a risk factor for specimen fragmentation (p = 0.03). There were no differences in severe (Grade 3/4) postoperative morbidity (13 vs. 10%; p = 0.5). Perineal wound dehiscences were less frequent among ELAPE (52 vs 13%; p < 0.01). Despite short follow-up (median 21 mo.), 2-year local recurrence-free survival was better for patients undergoing ELAPE when compared to APE (87 vs. 49%; p = 0.04). Conclusions ELAPE may be safely implemented into routine clinical practice with no increase in postoperative morbidity and considerable improvements in the quality of the resected specimen of patients with low rectal cancers.
- Baseline T Classification Predicts Early Tumor Regrowth After Nonoperative Management in Distal Rectal Cancer After Extended Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation and Initial Complete Clinical Response(2017) HABR-GAMA, Angelita; JULIAO, Guilherme Pagin Sao; GAMA-RODRIGUES, Joaquim; VAILATI, Bruna Borba; ORTEGA, Cinthia; FERNANDEZ, Laura Melina; ARAUJO, Sergio Eduardo Alonso; PEREZ, Rodrigo OlivaBACKGROUND: Selected patients with rectal cancer and complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation have been managed nonoperatively with acceptable outcomes. However, approximate to 20% of these patients will develop early tumor regrowth. Identification of these patients could select candidates for more intensive follow-up. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of baseline radiological T classification on recurrences after a complete clinical response managed nonoperatively after chemoradiation. DESIGN: This was a retrospective review of a prospective collected database. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a single center. PATIENTS: Patients with distal rectal cancer (cT2-4N0-2M0) undergoing extended chemoradiation (54 Gy + 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy) were eligible. Patients were reassessed for tumor response at 10 weeks after radiation completion. Patients with complete clinical response (clinical, radiological, and endoscopic) were managed nonoperatively and strictly followed. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Complete clinical response rates, early tumor regrowth rates (<12 mo), local recurrence-free survival, and distant metastases-free survival were measured. RESULTS: A total of 91 consecutive patients with rectal cancer underwent extended chemoradiation. Sixty-one patients developed initial complete clinical response (67%). cT2 patients developed similar initial complete clinical response rates compared with cT3/T4 (72% vs 63%; p = 0.403). Early tumor regrowths were more frequent among baseline cT3/4 when compared with cT2 patients (30% vs 3%; p = 0.007). There were no differences in late local recurrences (p = 0.593) or systemic recurrences (p = 0.387). Local recurrence-free survival was significantly better for cT2 patients at 1 year (96% vs 69%; p = 0.009). After Cox regression analysis, baseline T stage was an independent predictor of improved local recurrence-free survival at 1 year (p = 0.03; OR = 0.09 (95% CI, 0.01-0.81)). LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its small sample size, retrospective nature, and short follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: cT2 patients who develop complete clinical response after extended chemoradiation managed nonoperatively are less likely to develop early tumor regrowths when compared with cT3/4 patients. cT3/4 patients should undergo more intensive follow-up after a complete clinical response to allow for early detection of early regrowths.
bookPart Tratamento da deiscência anastomótica colorretal(2017) JULIãO, Guilherme Pagin São; VAILATI, Bruna Borba; PEREZ, Rodrigo Oliva; HABR-GAMA, Angelita- A multi-centre randomized controlled trial investigating Consolidation Chemotherapy with and without oxaliplatin in distal rectal cancer and Watch & Wait(2023) HABR-GAMA, Angelita; JULIAO, Guilherme Pagin Sao D.; ORTEGA, Cinthia D.; VAILATI, Bruna Borba; ARAUJO, Sergio; JORGE, Thiago; SABBAGA, Jorge L.; ROSSI, Gustavo L.; D'ALPINO, Renata; KATER, Fabio Roberto; AGUILAR, Patricia Bailao; MATTACHEO, Adrian; PEREZ, Rodrigo OlivaBackground Neoadjuvant chemoradiation(nCRT) has been considered the preferred initial treatment strategy for distal rectal cancer. Advantages of this approach include improved local control after radical surgery but also the opportunity for organ preserving strategies (Watch and Wait-WW). Consolidation chemotherapy(cCT) regimens using fluoropyrimidine-based with or without oxalipatin following nCRT have demonstrated to increase complete response and organ preservation rates among these patients. However, the benefit of adding oxaliplatin to cCT compared to fluoropirimidine alone regimens in terms of primary tumor response remains unclear. Since oxalipatin-treatment may be associated with considerable toxicity, it becomes imperative to understand the benefit of its incorporation into standard cCT regimens in terms of primary tumor response. The aim of the present trial is to compare the outcomes of 2 different cCT regimens following nCRT (fluoropyrimidine-alone versus fluoropyrimidine + oxaliplatin) for patients with distal rectal cancer.Methods In this multi-centre study, patients with magnetic resonance-defined distal rectal tumors will be randomized on a 1:1 ratio to receive long-course chemoradiation (54 Gy) followed by cCT with fluoropyrimidine alone versus fluoropyrimidine + oxaliplatin. Magnetic resonance(MR) will be analyzed centrally prior to patient inclusion and randomization. mrT2-3N0-1 tumor located no more than 1 cm above the anorectal ring determined by sagittal views on MR will be eligible for the study. Tumor response will be assessed after 12 weeks from radiotherapy(RT) completion. Patients with clinical complete response (clinical, endoscopic and radiological) may be enrolled in an organ-preservation program(WW). The primary endpoint of this trial is decision to organ-preservation surveillance (WW) at 18 weeks from RT completion. Secondary endpoints are 3-year surgery-free survival, TME-free survival, distant metastases-free survival, local regrowth-free survival and colostomy-free survival.Discussion Long-course nCRT with cCT is associated with improved complete response rates and may be a very attractive alternative to increase the chances for organ-preservation strategies. Fluoropyrimidine-based cCT with or without oxaliplatin has never been investigated in the setting of a randomized trial to compare clinical response rates and the possibility of organ-preservation. The outcomes of this study may significantly impact clinical practice of patients with distal rectal cancer interested in organ-preservation.
- Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM) Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer: Outcomes of Salvage Resection for Local Recurrence(2016) PEREZ, Rodrigo Oliva; HABR-GAMA, Angelita; JULIAO, Guilherme Pagin Sao; PROSCURSHIM, Igor; FERNANDEZ, Laura Melina; AZEVEDO, Rafael Ulysses de; VAILATI, Bruna B.; FERNANDES, Felipe Alexandre; GAMA-RODRIGUES, JoaquimTransanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) has been considered an alternative for selected patients with rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT). Immediate total mesorectal completion for all patients with unfavorable pathological features would result in unnecessary protectomies in a significant proportion of patients. Instead, salvage total mesorectal excision (TME) could be restricted for patients developing local recurrence. The aim of the present study is to determine oncological outcomes of salvage resection for local recurrences following CRT and TEM. Consecutive patients undergoing TEM following neoadjuvant CRT for rectal cancer were reviewed. Patients with ""near"" complete response to CRT (a parts per thousand currency sign3 cm; ycT1-2N0) were offered TEM. Salvage surgery was attempted in the event of a local recurrence. A total of 53 patients were managed by CRT followed by TEM. Unfavorable pathological features were present in 36 patients (68 %). None of the patients underwent immediate completion TME. There were 12 patients who developed local recurrence resulting in a 2-year local recurrence-free survival of 77 % (95 % CI, 53-100 %). Of these patients, 9 developed exclusively local recurrences, and all had at least 1 unfavorable pathological feature in the specimen after TEM (100 %). Eight patients (8 of 9) underwent salvage resection (abdominoperineal resection [APR] in 87 %) with CRM+ in 7 of 8 patients (87 %). Four patients developed local re-recurrence after a median 36 months of follow-up. The 2-year local re-recurrence free survival was 60 %. Salvage resection for local recurrence following CRT and TEM is associated with high rates of R1 resection (CRM+) and local re-recurrence. Immediate completion of TME should be considered for patients with unfavorable pathological features after TEM.
- Local Regrowth and the Risk of Distant Metastases Among Patients Undergoing Watch-and-Wait for Rectal Cancer: What Is the Best Control Group? Multicenter Retrospective Study(2024) JULIAO, Guilherme Pagin Sao; FERNANDEZ, Laura M.; VAILATI, Bruna Borba; HABR-GAMA, Angelita; AZEVEDO, Jose M.; SANTIAGO, Ines A.; PARES, Oriol; PARVAIZ, Amjad; VENDRELY, Veronique; RULLIER, Anne; RULLIER, Eric; DENOST, Quentin; PEREZ, Rodrigo OlivaBACKGROUND:A proportion of rectal cancer patients who achieve a clinical complete response may develop local regrowth. Although salvage appears to provide appropriate local control, the risk of distant metastases is less known.OBJECTIVE:To compare the risk of distant metastases between patients who achieve a clinical complete response (watch-and-wait strategy) and subsequent local regrowth and patients managed by surgery after chemoradiation.DESIGN:Retrospective multicenter cohort study.SETTINGS:This study used data of patients from 3 institutions who were treated between 1993 and 2019.PATIENTS:Patients with initial clinical complete response (after neoadjuvant therapy) followed by local regrowth and patients with near-complete pathological response (<= 10%) after straightforward surgery after chemoradiation were included.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for distant metastases. Kaplan-Meier curves were created (log-rank test) to compare survival outcomes. Analyses were performed using time zero as last day of radiation therapy or as date of salvage resection in the local regrowth group.RESULTS:Twenty-one of 79 patients with local regrowth developed distant metastases, whereas only 10 of 74 after upfront total mesorectal excision following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (p = 0.04). Local regrowth and final pathology (ypT3-4) were the only independent risk factors associated with distant metastases. When using date of salvage resection as time zero, distant metastases-free survival rates were significantly inferior for patients with local regrowth (70% vs 86%; p = 0.01).LIMITATIONS:Small number of patients, many neoadjuvant therapies, and selection bias.CONCLUSIONS:Patients undergoing watch-and-wait strategy who develop local regrowth are at higher risk for development of distant metastases compared to patients with near-complete pathological response managed by upfront surgery after chemoradiation. See Video Abstract
- Pitfalls of transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy(2014) HABR-GAMA, Angelita; JULIAO, Guilherme Pagin Sao; PEREZ, Rodrigo OlivaTransanal endoscopic microsurgery has become a very useful surgical tool for the management of selected cases of rectal cancer. However, the considerably high local recurrence rates led to the introduction of neoadjuvant therapies including radiation with or without chemotherapy. This treatment strategy may result in significant rates of tumor regression allowing the procedure to be offered to a significant proportion of cases. On the other hand, neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) may also determine wound-healing difficulties with significant postoperative pain. In addition, salvage total mesorectal excision in the case of local recurrence may also be a challenging task. Finally, accurate selection criteria for this minimally invasive approach are still lacking and may be influenced by baseline staging, post-treatment staging and final pathology information. Ultimately, selection of patients for this treatment modality remains a significant challenge for the colorectal surgeon who should be aware of the pitfalls of this procedure in the setting of neoadjuvant CRT.
- Organ Preservation in cT2N0 Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy The Impact of Radiation Therapy Dose-escalation and Consolidation Chemotherapy(2019) HABR-GAMA, Angelita; JULIAO, Guilherme Pagin Sao; VAILATI, Bruna Borba; SABBAGA, Jorge; AGUILAR, Patricia Bailao; FERNANDEZ, Laura Melina; ARAUJO, Sergio Eduardo Alonso; PEREZ, Rodrigo OlivaObjective: To demonstrate the difference in organ-preservation rates and avoidance of definitive surgery among cT2N0 rectal cancer patients undergoing 2 different chemoradiation (CRT) regimens. Background: Patients with cT2N0 rectal cancer are more likely to develop complete response to neoadjuvant CRT. Organ preservation has been considered an alternative treatment strategy for selected patients. Radiation dose-escalation and consolidation chemotherapy have been associated with increased rates of response and may improve chances of organ preservation among these patients. Methods: Patients with distal and nonmetastatic cT2N0 rectal cancer managed by neoadjuvant CRT were retrospectively reviewed. Patients undergoing standard CRT (50.4 Gy and 2 cycles of 5-FU-based chemotherapy) were compared with those undergoing extended CRT (54 Gy and 6 cycles of 5-FUbased chemotherapy). Patients were assessed for tumor response at 8 to 10 weeks. Patients with complete clinical response (cCR) underwent organ-preservation strategy (""Watch and Wait""). Patients were referred to salvage surgery in the event of local recurrence during follow-up. Results: Thirty-five patients underwent standard and 46 patients extended CRT. Patients undergoing extended CRT were more likely to undergo organ preservation and avoid definitive surgical resection at 5years (67% vs 30%; P = 0.001). After development of a cCR, surgery-free survival is similar between extended and standard CRT groups at 5 years (78% vs 56%; P = 0.12). Conclusions: Dose-escalation and consolidation chemotherapy leads to increased long-term organ-preservation rates among cT2N0 rectal cancer. After achievement of a cCR, the risk for local recurrence and need for salvage surgery is similar, irrespective of the CRT regimen.
- Salvage Surgery With Organ Preservation for Patients With Local Regrowth After Watch and Wait: Is It Still Possible?(2020) FERNANDEZ, Laura M.; FIGUEIREDO, Nuno L.; HABR-GAMA, Angelita; JULIAO, Guilherme P. Sao; VIEIRA, Pedro; VAILATI, Bruna B.; NASIR, Irfan; PARES, Oriol; SANTIAGO, Ines; CASTILLO-MARTIN, Mireia; CARVALHO, Carlos; PARVAIZ, Amjad; PEREZ, Rodrigo OlivaBACKGROUND: Patients with rectal cancer who achieve complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation have been managed nonoperatively. Thirty percent of these patients may develop a local regrowth, and salvage resection with radical surgery is usually recommended. However, selected patients could be offered additional organ preservation by local excision. We hypothesized that patients with baseline T2 who underwent neoadjuvant therapy (for the specific purpose of achieving a complete clinical response) were more likely to harbor recurrent disease at an earlier stage and amenable to organ preservation strategies (local excision) when compared with T3/T4 (undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation for oncologic reasons). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare patients with local regrowth requiring salvage resection according to their baseline stage. DESIGN: This was a retrospective review of consecutive patients with nonmetastatic distal rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation. SETTINGS: The study included 2 independent tertiary centers with institutional watch-and-wait organ preservation programs. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients with distal rectal cancer (cT2-4N1-2M0) managed by watch and wait and local regrowth from 2 institutions were included. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Final pathologic features and surgical and oncologic outcomes were compared according to baseline staging. RESULTS: A total of 73 of 257 patients experienced local regrowth. cT2 presented similar to ypT, ypN, R0, and abdominal perineal resection rates (p> 0.05) at the time of salvage when compared with cT3 to cT4. Patients with cT2 at baseline were more likely to undergo an organ preservation procedure for salvage (56.2% vs 26.5%;p= 0.03). Overall and disease-free survival after salvage were similar between groups irrespective of the type of surgery for the regrowth. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study, small sample size, and possible inaccurate baseline staging. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with baseline cT2 rectal cancer had similar pathologic stage at the time of recurrence, these patients were more likely to continue an organ preservation pathway after local regrowth through transanal local excision when compared with cT3 to cT4. Despite differences in the use of radical salvage resection, there were no differences in oncologic outcomes.