DALTON MARQUES CHAVES
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto Central, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
5 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 5 de 5
conferenceObject Gastric PerOral Endoscopic Myotomy (G-POEM) for Refractory Gastroparesis: Results From the First Multicenter Study on Endoscopic Pyloromyotomy(2016) KHASHAB, Mouen A.; NGAMRUENGPHONG, Saowanee; CARR-LOCKE, David L.; BAPAYE, Amol; BENIAS, Petros C.; SEROUYA, Sam; DUBALE, Nachiket; CHAVES, Dalton M.; ARTIFON, Everson L.; KUMBHARI, Vivek; CHAVEZ, Yamile Haito; BUKHARI, Majidah; HAJIYEVA, Gulara; ISMAIL, Amr; CHEN, Yen-I.; MOURA, Eduardo G. de; CHUNG, Hyunsoo- Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatogrphy in suspected choledocholithiasis: A systematic review(2016) CASTRO, Vinicius Leite De; MOURA, Eduardo G. H.; CHAVES, Dalton M.; BERNARDO, Wanderley M.; MATUGUMA, Sergio E.; ARTIFON, Everson L. A.Background and Objectives: There is a lack of consensus about the optimal noninvasive strategy for patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. Two previous systematic reviews used different methodologies not based on pretest probabilities that demonstrated no statistically significant difference between Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for the detection of choledocholithiasis. In this article, we made a comparison of the diagnostic ability of EUS and MRCP to detect choledocholithiasis in suspected patients. Methods: We conducted a systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations with all published randomized prospective trials. We performed the systemic review using MedLine, EMBASE, Cochrane, LILACS, and Scopus reviews through May 2015. We identified eight randomized, prospective, blinded trials comparing EUS and MRCP. All the patients were submitted to a gold standard method. We calculated the study-specific variables and performed analyses using aggregated variables such as sensitivity, specificity, prevalence, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy. Results: Five hundred and thirty eight patients were included in the analysis. The pretest probability for choledocholithiasis was 38.7. The mean sensitivity of EUS and MRCP for detection of choledocholithiasis was 93.7 and 83.5, respectively; the specificity was 88.5 and 91.5, respectively. Regarding EUS and MRCP, PPV was 89 and 87.8, respectively, and NPV was 96.9 and 87.8, respectively. The accuracy of EUS and MRCP was 93.3 and 89.7, respectively. Conclusions: For the same pretest probability of choledocholithiasis, EUS has higher posttest probability when the result is positive and a lower posttest probability when the result is negative compared with MRCP.
conferenceObject Endoscopic Ultrasound Evaluation After Endoscopic Eradication of Esophageal Varices With Band Ligation: Does It Predict Variceal Recurrence?(2016) CARNEIRO, Fred O.; RETES, Felipe A.; MATUGUMA, Sergio E.; ALBERS, Debora V.; CHAVES, Dalton M.; SANTOS, Marcos E.; HERMAN, Paulo; CHAIB, Eleazar; SAKAI, Paulo; ALBUQUERQUE, Luiz C. D.; MALUF-FILHO, Fauze- Endoscopic versus surgical treatment of ampullary adenomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis(2016) MENDONCA, Ernesto Quaresma; BERNARDO, Wanderley Marques; MOURA, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux de; CHAVES, Dalton Marques; KONDO, Andre; PU, Leonardo Zorron Cheng Tao; BARACAT, Felipe IankelevichThe aim of this study is to address the outcomes of endoscopic resection compared with surgery in the treatment of ampullary adenomas. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. For this purpose, the Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciencias da Saude (LILACS), Scopus and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases were scanned. Studies included patients with ampullary adenomas and data considering endoscopic treatment compared with surgery. The entire analysis was based on a fixed-effects model. Five retrospective cohort studies were selected (466 patients). All five studies (466 patients) had complete primary resection data available and showed a difference that favored surgical treatment (risk difference [RD] = -0.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.44 to -0.04). Primary success data were identified in all five studies as well. Analysis showed that the surgical approach outperformed endoscopic treatment for this outcome (RD = -0.37, 95% CI = -0.50 to -0.24). Recurrence data were found in all studies (466 patients), with a benefit indicated for surgical treatment (RD = 0.10, 95% CI = -0.01 to 0.19). Three studies (252 patients) presented complication data, but analysis showed no difference between the approaches for this parameter (RD = -0.15, 95% CI = -0.53 to 0.23). Considering complete primary resection, primary success and recurrence outcomes, the surgical approach achieves significantly better results. Regarding complication data, this systematic review concludes that rates are not significantly different.
- Role of EUS evaluation after endoscopic eradication of esophageal varices with band ligation(2016) CARNEIRO, Fred Olavo Aragao Andrade; RETES, Felipe Alves; MATUGUMA, Sergio Eiji; ALBERS, Debora Vieira; CHAVES, Dalton Marques; SANTOS, Marcos Eduardo Lera dos; HERMAN, Paulo; CHAIB, Eleazar; SAKAI, Paulo; D'ALBUQUERQUE, Luiz Augusto Carneiro; MALUF FILHO, FauzeBackground and Aims: Variceal recurrence after endoscopic band ligation (EBL) for secondary prophylaxis is a frequent event. Some studies have reported a correlation between variceal recurrence and variceal rebleeding with the EUS features of paraesophageal vessels. A prospective observational study was conducted to correlate EUS evaluation of paraesophageal varices, azygos vein, and thoracic duct with variceal recurrence after EBL variceal eradication in patients with cirrhosis. Methods: EUS was performed before and 1 month after EBL variceal eradication. Paraesophageal varices, azygos vein, and thoracic duct maximum diameters were evaluated in predetermined anatomic stations. After EBL variceal eradication, patients were submitted to endoscopic examinations every 3 months for 1 year. We looked for EUS features that could predict variceal recurrence. Results: Thirty patients completed a 1-year endoscopic follow-up. Seventeen patients (57%) presented variceal recurrence. There was no correlation between azygos vein and thoracic duct diameter with variceal recurrence. Larger paraesophageal varices predicted variceal recurrence in both evaluation periods. Paraesophageal varices diameters that best correlated with variceal recurrence were 6.3 mm before EBL (52.9% sensitivity, 92.3% specificity, and .749 area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC]) and 4 mm after EBL (70.6% sensitivity, 84.6% specificity, and .801 AUROC). Conclusions: We conclude that paraesophageal varices diameter measured by EUS predicts variceal recurrence within 1 year after EBL variceal eradication. Paraesophageal diameter after variceal eradication is a better recurrence predictor, because it has a lower cut-off parameter, higher sensitivity, and higher AUROC.