CAIO SERGIO RIZKALLAH NAHAS

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
12
Lattes
ResearcherID
ORCID
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico

Filtros

Limpar filtros

Configurações

Autor: MARQUES, Carlos Frederico Sparapan ×

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 10 de 23
  • article 6 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    A novel approach for the treatment of pelvic abscess: transrectal endoscopic drainage facilitated by transanal endoscopic microsurgery access
    (2012) MARTINS, B. C.; MARQUES, Carlos Frederico Sparapan; NAHAS, Caio Sergio Rizkallah; HONDO, Fabio Yuji; POLLARA, Wilson; NAHAS, Sergio Carlos; RIBEIRO JUNIOR, U.; CECCONELLO, Ivan; MALUF-FILHO, Fauze
    Postoperative pelvic abscesses in patients submitted to colorectal surgery are challenging. The surgical approach may be too risky, and image-guided drainage often is difficult due to the complex anatomy of the pelvis. This article describes novel access for drainage of a pelvic collection using a minimally invasive natural orifice approach. A 37 year-old man presented with sepsis due to a pelvic abscess during the second postoperative week after a Hartmann procedure due to perforated rectal cancer. Percutaneous drainage was determined by computed tomography to be unsuccessful, and another operation was considered to be hazardous. Because the pelvic fluid was very close to the rectal stump, transrectal drainage was planned. The rectal stump was opened using transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) instruments. The endoscope was advanced through the TEM working channel and the rectal stump opening, accessing the abdominal cavity and pelvic collection. The pelvic collection was endoscopically drained and the local cavity washed with saline through the scope channel. A Foley catheter was placed in the rectal stump. The patient's recovery after the procedure was successful, without the need for further intervention. Transrectal endoscopic drainage may be an option for selected cases of pelvic fluid collection in patients submitted to Hartmann's procedure. The technique allows not only fluid drainage but also visualization of the local cavity, cleavage of multiloculated abscesses, and saline irrigation if necessary. The use of TEM instrumentation allows safe access to the peritoneal cavity.
  • article 1 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Salvage Surgery for Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Still a Difficult Challenge
    (2023) PAIVA, Aline Costa Mendes de; NAHAS, Sergio Carlos; KIMURA, Cintia M. S.; MONIZ, Camila Motta Venchiarutti; MARQUES, Carlos Frederico Sparapan; RIBEIRO JUNIOR, Ulysses; NAHAS, Caio Sergio Rizkallah
  • article 4 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    PEG rescue with gastropexy after early tube withdrawal: an application of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (with video)
    (2011) MARTINS, Bruno da Costa; TAKADA, Jonas; KAWAGUTI, Fabio Shiguehissa; RIBEIRO, Joao Paulo Aguiar; HONDO, Fabio Yuji; LIMA, Marcelo Simas de; NEVES, Carla Zanellatto; NAHAS, Caio Sergio R.; MARQUES, Carlos Frederico Sparapan; SAKAI, Paulo; MALUF-FILHO, Fauze
  • bookPart
    Hemorroidas e Doença Hemorroidária
    (2013) NAHAS, Sergio Carlos; MARQUES, Carlos Frederico Sparapan; SOBRADO, Carlos Walter; NAHAS, Caio Sergio Rizkallah
  • article
    PROGNOSTIC FACTORS FOR LEFT COLECTOMY FOR COLON CANCER: A TEN YEARS EXPERIENCE OF A SINGLE UNIVERSITY INSTITUTION
    (2017) NAHAS, Sergio Carlos; NAHAS, Caio Sergio; BUSTAMANTE-LOPEZ, Leonardo Alfonso; PINTO, Rodrigo Ambar; MARQUES, Carlos Frederico Sparapan; CAMPOS, Fabio Guilherme; CECCONELLO, Ivan
    ABSTRACT Background: Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the world. In Brazil, it is the leading cause of cancer in the gastrointestinal tract. Aim: To evaluate the preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative risk factors for recurrence and overall survival of patients with left colon cancer operated during a ten-year period. Methods: Patients with left colon cancer surgically treated underwent clinical preoperative workout and cancer staging. The following factors were studied: gender, age, tumor location, T stage, lymph node yield, N stage, M stage, histological type, and tumor differentiation. It was analyzed the influence in five-year overall survival. Results: A total of 173 patients underwent left colectomy for colon cancer. There was a slight predominance of male gender with 50.9%. The mean age was 60.8 years old. Fifteen (8.7%) tumors were located at splenic flexure, 126 (72.8%) at sigmoid colon, and 32 (18.5%) at descending colon. The median length of hospital stay was seven days. Mean survival was 47.5 months. At 60 months seven patients (4%) lost follow-up, 38 patients (21.9%) deceased and 135 patients (78%) were alive. Overall survival time was 48 months. Conclusion: Advanced stages (T3-T4, N+ and M+) were the only factors associated with poor long term survival in left colon cancer.
  • article 0 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Comparing three-dimensional endorectal ultrasound and magnification chromoendoscopy for early rectal neoplasia invasion depth assessment
    (2024) PINTO, Rodrigo Ambar; KAWAGUTI, Fabio Shiguehissa; KIMURA, Cintia Mayumi Sakurai; CORREA NETO, Isaac Jose Felippe; NAHAS, Caio Sergio Rizkallah; MARQUES, Carlos Frederico Sparapan; BUSTAMANTE-LOPEZ, Leonardo Alfonso; RIBEIRO-JR, Ulysses; MALUF-FILHO, Fauze; NAHAS, Sergio Carlos
    IntroductionAccurate assessment of invasion depth of early rectal neoplasms is essential for optimal therapy. We aimed to compare three-dimensional endorectal ultrasound (3D-ERUS) with magnification chromoendoscopy (MCE) regarding their accuracy in assessing parietal invasion depth (T).MethodsPatients with middle and distal rectum neoplasms were prospectively included. Two providers blinded to each other's assessment performed 3D-ERUS and MCE, respectively. The T stage assessed through ERUS was compared to the MCE evaluation. The results were compared to the surgical specimen anatomopathological report. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive (PPV), and negative (NPV) predictive values were calculated for the T stage and for the final therapy (local excision or radical surgery).ResultsIn 8 years, 70 patients were enrolled, and all underwent both exams. MCE and ERUS showed an accuracy of 94.3% and 85.7%, sensitivity of 83.7 and 93.3%, specificity of 96.4 and 83.6%, PPV of 86.7 and 60.9%, and NPV of 96.4 and 97.9%, respectively. Kappa for T stage assessed through ERUS was 0.64 and 0.83 for MCE.ConclusionMCE and 3D-ERUS had good diagnostic performance, but the endoscopic method had higher accuracy. Both methods reliably assessed lesion extension, circumferential involvement, and distance from the anal verge.
  • article 3 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    OCULAR MELANOMA WITH MULTIPLE GASTROINTESTINAL METASTASES
    (2011) KAWAGUTI, Fabio Shiguehissa; MALUF-FILHO, Fauze; MEDEIROS, Raphael Salles S.; MARTINS, Bruno Da Costa; LIMA, Marcelo Simas De; HONDO, Fabio Yuji; NAHAS, Caio Sergio Rizkallah; MARQUES, Carlos Frederico Sparapan; SAKAI, Paulo
  • article 57 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Transient Ischemic Rectitis as a Potential Complication after Prostatic Artery Embolization: Case Report and Review of the Literature
    (2013) MOREIRA, Airton Mota; MARQUES, Carlos Frederico Sparapan; ANTUNES, Alberto Azoubel; NAHAS, Caio Sergio Rizkallah; NAHAS, Sergio Carlos; ARIZA, Miguel Angel de Gregorio; CARNEVALE, Francisco Cesar
    Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) is an alternative treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Complications are primarily related to non-target embolization. We report a case of ischemic rectitis in a 76-year-old man with significant lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia, probably related to nontarget embolization. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed an 85.5-g prostate and urodynamic studies confirmed Inferior vesical obstruction. PAE was performed bilaterally. During the first 3 days of follow-up, a small amount of blood mixed in the stool was observed. Colonoscopy identified rectal ulcers at day 4, which had then disappeared by day 16 post PAE without treatment. PAE is a safe, effective procedure with a low complication rate, but interventionalists should be aware of the risk of rectal nontarget embolization.
  • article 5 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and transanal endoscopic microsurgery for the treatment of rectal tumors
    (2021) KIMURA, Cintia Mayumi Sakurai; KAWAGUTI, Fabio Shiguehissa; NAHAS, Caio Sergio Rizkallah; MARQUES, Carlos Frederico Sparapan; SEGATELLI, Vanderlei; MARTINS, Bruno Costa; PAULO, Gustavo Andrade de; CECCONELLO, Ivan; RIBEIRO-JUNIOR, Ulysses; NAHAS, Sergio Carlos; MALUF-FILHO, Fauze
    Background and Aim Endoscopic submucosal dissection and transanal endoscopic microsurgery are good options for the treatment of rectal adenomas and early rectal carcinomas, but whether long-term outcomes of these procedures are comparable is not known. The aim of this study was to address this question. Methods A retrospective single-center study evaluating 98 consecutive procedures between June 2008 and December 2017 was performed in a tertiary cancer center. Consecutive patients who had undergone either endoscopic submucosal resection or transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal adenomas and early rectal carcinomas were evaluated, and long-term recurrence and complication rates were compared. Results Both groups were similar regarding sex, age, preoperative surgical risk, and en bloc resection rate (95.7% in the endoscopic and 100% in the surgical group, P = 0.81). Mean follow-up period was 37.6 months. Lesions resected endoscopically were significantly larger (68.5 mm) than those resected by transanal resection (44.5 mm), P = 0.003. Curative resections occurred in 97.2% of endoscopic resections and 85.2% of the surgical ones (P = 0.04). Comparing resections that fulfilled histologic curative criteria, there were no recurrences in the endoscopic group (out of 69 cases) and two recurrences in the transanal group (8.3% of 24 cases), P = 0.06. Late complications occurred in 12.7% of endoscopic procedures and 25.9% of surgical procedures (P = 0.13). Conclusions In our experience, endoscopic submucosal resection seems to have advantages over transanal endoscopic microsurgery, with similar en bloc resection rate and lower rate of late complications and recurrences. Multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to support our findings.
  • article 12 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Is it Safe to Perform Elective Colorectal Surgical Procedures during the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Single Institution Experience with 103 Patients
    (2021) SOBRADO, Lucas Faraco; NAHAS, Caio Sergio Rizkallah; MARQUES, Carlos Frederico Sparapan; COTTI, Guilherme Cutait de Castro; IMPERIALE, Antonio Rocco; AVERBACH, Pedro; MEIRA JR., Jose Donizeti de; HORVAT, Natally; RIBEIRO JR., Ulysses; CECCONELLO, Ivan; NAHAS, Sergio Carlos
    OBJECTIVES: Since the outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), all health services worldwide underwent profound changes, leading to the suspension of many elective surgeries. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of elective colorectal surgery during the pandemic. METHODS: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional, single-center study. Patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic between March 10 and September 9, 2020, were included. Patient data on sex, age, diagnosis, types of procedures, hospital stay, mortality, and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) preoperative screening tests were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 103 colorectal surgical procedures were planned, and 99 were performed. Four surgeries were postponed due to positive preoperative screening for SARS-CoV-2. Surgical procedures were performed for colorectal cancer (n=90) and inflammatory bowel disease (n=9). Laparoscopy was the approach of choice for 43 patients (43.4%), 53 (53.5%) procedures were open, and 3 (3%) procedures were robotic. Five patients developed COVID-19 in the postoperative period, and three of them died in the intensive care unit (n=3/5, 60% mortality). Two other patients died due to surgical complications unrelated to COVID-19 (n=2/94, 2.1% mortality) (p<0.01). Hospital stay was longer in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection than in those without (38.4 versus 10.3 days, respectively, p<0.01). Of the 99 patients who received surgical care during the pandemic, 94 were safely discharged (95%). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that elective colorectal surgical procedures may be safely performed during the pandemic; however, preoperative testing should be performed to reduce in-hospital infection rates, since the mortality rate due to SARS-CoV-2 in this setting is particularly high.