HENRIQUE BARBOSA RIBEIRO
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
4 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 4 de 4
- Myocardial Injury After Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Reoperation(2024) MARCHI, Mauricio Felippi de Sa; ROSA, Vitor Emer Egypto; NICZ, Pedro Felipe Gomes; FONSECA, Jose Honorio de Almeida Palma da; CALOMENI, Pedro; CHIODINI, Fernando; SAMPAIO, Roney Orismar; POMERANTZEFF, Pablo Maria Alberto; VIEIRA, Marcelo de Campos; TARASOUTCHI, Flavio; MIEGHEM, Nicolas M. Van; BRITO, Fabio Sandoli de; ABIZAID, Alexandre; RIBEIRO, Henrique BarbosaThis study aimed to evaluate the incidence and clinical implications of myocardial injury, as determined by cardiac biomarker increase, in patients who underwent mitral bioprosthesis dysfunction treatment with transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) versus surgical mitral valve replacement reoperation (SMVR-REDO). Between 2014 and 2023, 310 patients with mitral bioprosthesis failure were included (90 and 220 patients for TMVR and SMVR-REDO, respectively). Multivariable analysis and propensity score matching were performed to adjust for the intergroup differences in baseline characteristics. Creatinine kinase-MB (CK-MB) and cardiac troponin I (cTn) were collected at baseline and 6 to 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after intervention. The cardiac biomarkers values were evaluated in relation to their reference values. The outcomes were determined according to the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria. CK-MB and cTn increased above the reference level in almost all patients after SMVR-REDO and TMVR (100% vs 94%, respectively), with the peak occurring within 6 to 12 hours. SMVR-REDO was associated with a two- to threefold higher increase in cardiac biomarkers. After 30 days, the mortality rates were 13.3% in the TMVR and 16.8% in the SMVR-REDO groups. At a median follow-up of 19 months, the mortality rates were 21.1% in the TMVR and 17.7% in the SMVR-REDO groups. Left ventricular ejection fraction, estimated glomerular filtration rate, CK-MB, and cTn were predictors of mortality. In conclusion, some degree of myocardial injury occurred systematically after the treatment of mitral bioprosthetic degeneration, especially after SMVR, and higher CK-MB and cTn levels were associated with increased cumulative late mortality, regardless of the approach.
- Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Small Aortic Annulus: A Randomized Clinical Trial(2024) RODES-CABAU, Josep; RIBEIRO, Henrique Barbosa; MOHAMMADI, Siamak; SERRA, Vicenc; AL-ATASSI, Talal; INIGUEZ, Andres; VILALTA, Victoria; NOMBELA-FRANCO, Luis; SANCHEZ, Jose Ignacio Saez de Ibarra; AUFFRET, Vincent; FORCILLO, Jessica; CONRADI, Lenard; URENA, Marina; MORIS, Cesar; MUNOZ-GARCIA, Antonio; PARADIS, Jean-Michel; DUMONT, Eric; KALAVROUZIOTIS, Dimitri; POMERANTZEFF, Pablo Maria; ROSA, Vitor Emer Egypto; LOPES, Mariana Pezzute; SUREDA, Carles; DIAZ, Victor Alfonso Jimenez; GIULIANI, Carlos; AVVEDIMENTO, Marisa; PELLETIER-BEAUMONT, Emilie; PIBAROT, PhilippeBACKGROUND: The optimal treatment in patients with severe aortic stenosis and small aortic annulus (SAA) remains to be determined. This study aimed to compare the hemodynamic and clinical outcomes between transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with a SAA. METHODS: This prospective multicenter international randomized trial was performed in 15 university hospitals. Participants were 151 patients with severe aortic stenosis and SAA (mean diameter <23 mm) randomized (1:1) to TAVR (n=77) versus SAVR (n=74). The primary outcome was impaired valve hemodynamics (ie, severe prosthesis patient mismatch or moderate-severe aortic regurgitation) at 60 days as evaluated by Doppler echocardiography and analyzed in a central echocardiography core laboratory. Clinical events were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: The mean age of the participants was 75.5 +/- 5.1 years, with 140 (93%) women, a median Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality of 2.50% (interquartile range, 1.67%-3.28%), and a median annulus diameter of 21.1 mm (interquartile range, 20.4-22.0 mm). There were no differences between groups in the rate of severe prosthesis patient mismatch (TAVR, 4 [5.6%]; SAVR, 7 [10.3%]; P=0.30) and moderate-severe aortic regurgitation (none in both groups). No differences were found between groups in mortality rate (TAVR, 1 [1.3%]; SAVR, 1 [1.4%]; P=1.00) and stroke (TAVR, 0; SAVR, 2 [2.7%]; P=0.24) at 30 days. After a median follow-up of 2 (interquartile range, 1-4) years, there were no differences between groups in mortality rate (TAVR, 7 [9.1%]; SAVR, 6 [8.1%]; P=0.89), stroke (TAVR, 3 [3.9%]; SAVR, 3 [4.1%]; P=0.95), and cardiac hospitalization (TAVR, 15 [19.5%]; SAVR, 15 [20.3%]; P=0.80). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe aortic stenosis and SAA (women in the majority), there was no evidence of superiority of contemporary TAVR versus SAVR in valve hemodynamic results. After a median follow-up of 2 years, there were no differences in clinical outcomes between groups. These findings suggest that the 2 therapies represent a valid alternative for treating patients with severe aortic stenosis and SAA, and treatment selection should likely be individualized according to baseline characteristics, additional anatomical risk factors, and patient preference. However, the results of this study should be interpreted with caution because of the limited sample size leading to an underpowered study, and need to be confirmed in future larger studies.
- Potential performance of a 0 h/1 h algorithm and a single cut-off measure of high-sensitivity troponin T in a diverse population: main results of the IN-HOPE study(2023) SILVA, Pedro G. M. de Barros E.; FERREIRA, Ana Amaral; MALAFAIA, Felipe; REIS, Antonielle Figueiredo Macedo Tavares; SZNEJDER, Henry; LOPES JUNIOR, Augusto Celso De Araujo; AGOSTINHO, Camila Anacleto; FONSECA, Luiz Henrique de Oliveira; OKITOI, Debora Vieira Donini; CORREA, Celso Musa; ZINCONE, Eduardo; CURY, Marcelo Paiva; ROSA, Gustavo Augusto Lopes; RIBEIRO, Henrique Barbosa; SOEIRO, Alexandre de Matos; OLIVEIRA, Carlos Alexandre Lemes de; KUUSBERG, Guilherme Capelli; OHE, Louis Nakayama; SOUZA, Douglas de Oliveira; MANFREDI, Adriana Bertolami; MARTINS, Amanda Francisco; SAMPAIO, Pedro Paulo Nogueres; VAZ, Thiago Baganha; FRANCO, Luciana Ferreira; FERREIRA, Carlos Eduardo Dos Santos; LOPES, Renato DelascioAims Chest pain is a major cause of medical evaluation at emergency department (ED) and demands observation to exclude the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). High-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays used as isolated measure and by 0- and 1-h algorithms are accepted as a rule-in/rule-out strategy, but there is a lack of validation in specific populations. Methods and results The IN-HOspital Program to systematizE Chest Pain Protocol (IN-HOPE study) is a multicentre study that prospectively included patients admitted to the ED due to suspected symptoms of AMI at 16 sites in Brazil. Medical decisions of all patients followed the standard approach of 0 h/3 h protocol, but, in addition, blood samples were also collected at 0 and 1 h and sent to a central laboratory (core lab) to measure high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT). To assess the theoretical performance of 0 h/1 h algorithm, troponin < 12 ng/L with a delta < 3 was considered rule-out while a value >= 52 or a delta >= 5 was considered a rule-in criterion (the remaining were considered as observation group). The main objective of the study was to assess, in a population managed by the 0 h/3 h protocol, the accuracy of 0 h/1 h algorithm overall and in groups with a higher probability of AMI. All patients were followed up for 30 days, and potential events were adjudicated. In addition to the prospective cohort, a retrospective analysis was performed assessing all patients with hs-cTnT measured during the year of 2021 but not included in the prospective cohort, regardless of the indication of the test. A total of 5.497 patients were included (583 in the prospective and 4.914 in the retrospective analysis). The prospective cohort had a mean age of 57.3 (+/- 14.8) and 45.6% of females with a mean HEART score of 4.0 +/- 2.2. By the core lab analysis, 74.4% would be eligible for a rule-out approach (45.3% of them with a HEART score > 3) while 7.3% would fit the rule-in criteria. In this rule-out group, the negative predictive value for index AMI was 100% (99.1-100) overall and regardless of clinical scores. At 30 days, no death or AMI occurred in the rule-out group of both 0/ 1 and 0/3 h algorithms while 52.4% of the patients in the rule-in group (0 h/1 h) were considered as AMI by adjudication. In the observation group (grey zone) of 0 h/ 1 h algorithm, GRACE discriminated the risk of these patients better than HEART score. In the retrospective analysis, 1.091 patients had a troponin value of < 5 ng/ L and there were no cardiovascular deaths at 30 days in this group. Among all 4.914 patients, the 30-day risk of AMI or cardiovascular death increased according to the level of troponin: 0% in the group < 5 ng/ L, 0.6% between 5 and 14 ng/L, 2.2% between 14 and 42 ng/L, 6.3% between 42 and 90 ng/L, and 7.7% in the level >= 90 ng/L. Conclusion In this large multicentre study, a 0 h/1 h algorithm had the potential to classify as rule-in or rule-out in almost 80% of the patients. The rule-out protocol had high negative predictive value regardless of clinical risk scores. Categories of levels of hscTn T also showed good accuracy in discriminating risk of the patients with a very favourable prognosis for cardiovascular death in the group with value < 5 ng/L. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04756362
- Comparative analysis of different risk prediction tools after mitral Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair(2024) MARCHI, Mauricio Felippi de Sa; DORPEL, Mark van den; CALOMENI, Pedro; CHATTERJEE, Sraman; ADRICHEM, Rik; VERHEMEL, Sarah; ENDEN, Antoon J. M. Van den; DAEMEN, Joost; KARDYS, Isabella; RIBEIRO, Henrique Barbosa; MIEGHEM, Nicolas M. VanBackground: Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) has become an established treatment for primary and secondary mitral regurgitation (PMR and SMR). The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of different risk scores for predicting 1-year mortality and the composite endpoint of 1-year mortality and/or heart failure (HF) hospitalization after TEER. Methods: We analyzed data from 206 patients treated for MR at a tertiary European center between 2011 and 2023 and compared the accuracy of different mitral and surgical risk scores: EuroSCORE II, GRASP, MITRALITY, MitraScore, TAPSE/PASP-MitraScore, and STS for predicting 1-year mortality and the composite of 1-year mortality and/or HF hospitalization in PMR and SMR. A subanalysis of SMR-only patients with the addition of COAPT Risk Score and baseline N -Terminal pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) list was also performed. Results: MITRALITY had the best discriminative ability for 1-year mortality and the composite endpoint of 1-year mortality and/or HF hospitalization, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.74 and 0.74, respectively, in a composed group of PMR and SMR. In a SMR-only population, MITRALITY also presented the best AUC for 1-year mortality and the composite endpoint of 1-year mortality and/or HF hospitalization, with values of 0.72 and 0.72, respectively. Conclusion: MITRALITY was the best mitral TEER risk model for both 1-year mortality and the composite endpoint of 1-year mortality and/or HF hospitalization in a population of PMR and SMR patients, as well as in SMR patients only. Surgical risk scores, MitraScore, TAPSE/PASP-MitraScore and NT-proBNP alone showed poor predictive values.