JOAQUIM PRADO PINTO DE MORAES FILHO

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
10
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Faculdade de Medicina - Docente

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 9 de 9
  • bookPart
    Doença do refluxo gastresofágico
    (2013) MORAES-FILHO, Joaquim Prado Pinto de; CHAVES, Renata Carvalho de Miranda; DIB, Ricardo Anuar; NAVARRO-RODRIGUEZ, Tomás
  • article 25 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Low levels of adherence with proton pump inhibitor therapy contribute to therapeutic failure in gastroesophageal reflux disease
    (2012) DAL-PAZ, K.; MORAES-FILHO, J. P.; NAVARRO-RODRIGUEZ, T.; EISIG, J. N.; BARBUTI, R.; QUIGLEY, E. M. M.
    To assess adherence to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment and associated variables in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Cross-sectional and prospective comprising 240 consecutive adult patients, diagnosed with GERD for whom continuous use of standard or double dose of omeprazole had been prescribed. Patients were ranked as ne-GERD (162: 67.5%) or e-GERD classified according to the Los Angeles classification as A (48:20.0%), B (21:8.6%), C (1:0.5%), D (1:0.5%), and Barrett's esophagus (7:2.9%). The Morisky questionnaire was applied to assess adherence to therapy and a GERD questionnaire to assess symptoms and their impact. Adherence was correlated with demographics, cotherapies, comorbidities, treatment duration, symptoms scores, endoscopic findings, and patient awareness of their disease. 126 patients (52.5%) exhibited high level of adherence and 114 (47.5%) low level. Youngers (P= 0.002) or married (O.R. 2.41, P= 0.03 vs. widowers) patients had lower levels of adherence; symptomatic patients exhibited lower adherence (P= 0.02). All other variables studied had no influence on adherence. Patients with GERD attending a tertiary referral hospital in Sao Paulo exhibited a high rate of low adherence to the prescribed PPI therapy that may play a role in the therapy failure. Age <60 years, marital status and being symptomatic were risk factors for low adherence.
  • article 3 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Esophageal motility patterns are altered in older adult patients
    (2020) KUNEN, L. C. B.; FONTES, L. H. S.; MORAES-FILHO, J. P.; ASSIRATI, F. S.; NAVARRO-RODRIGUEZ, T.
    Introduction and aims: Since the 1960s, several studies have shown the effect of aging on esophageal motility, with inconsistent results. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the manometric results in older adult patients (>= 60 years of age) with an esophageal disorder and compare them with adults under 60 years of age. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional, retrospective study was conducted that included a sample of 1,175 patients (936 older adults and 239 non-older adults). The patients were evaluated and compared with respect to (i) sex, (ii) main complaint for which esophageal manometry was indicated, (iii) comorbidities, (iv) current medications, (v) smoking, and (vi) manometry results. Results: Patient age ranged from 19 to 92 years (women made up 76.5% of the older adults and 72.8% of the non-older adults). Normal lower esophageal sphincter relaxation and normal peristalsis were more frequent in the non-older patient group (91.1% vs. 84.8% and 87.4% vs. 76%, respectively). The manometry results for the non-older adults vs. the older adults, respectively, were: achalasia (2.9% vs. 5.9%); hypercontractile disorder (9.2% vs. 10.4%); hypocontractile disorder (38.5% vs. 47.6%); and normal values (49.4% vs. 36.1%). After excluding the variables that could change esophageal motility, the results revealed significant differences between the two study groups. Conclusions: Esophageal manometry demonstrated statistically significant differences between the older adult and non-older adult study population evaluated. (C) 2019 Asociacion Mexicana de Gastroenterologia.
  • article
    Delayed Gastric Emptying of Semi-solid diets in Patients with Chagasic Megaesophagus
    (2014) CHINZON, Decio; NAVARRO-RODRIGUEZ, Tomas; DAL-PAZ, Karine; DIB, Ricardo Anuar; MORAES-FILHO, Joaquim Prado Pinto de
    OBJECTIVE: To measure the time to gastric emptying of a semi-solid diet in individuals with Chagasic megaesophagus, in comparison with a non-Chagasic control group. METHOD: The time to gastric emptying of a semi-solid diet was assessed via ultrasonography in 28 patients with Chagasic megaesophagus (grades I, II, and III) and compared to that of a control group (n = 15). After measurement of antral diameter under fasting conditions, 400mL of a semi-solid diet were administered and consecutive measurements were performed every 30 min. RESULTS: The duration of dysphagia was significantly lower in patients with megaesophagus grade I than in those with grades II or III. The time to gastric emptying was significantly increased in the megaesophagus group compared to the control group. The means of antral areas measured under fasting conditions and after maximal antral distension did not differ between the megaesophagus and control groups. CONCLUSION: The time to gastric emptying of a semi-solid diet was significantly greater in patients with Chagasic megaesophagus than in controls. The delay did not depend on the extent of dilatation of the megaesophagus or the duration of dysphagia.
  • article 28 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Eosinophilic esophagitis in patients with typical gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms refractory to proton pump inhibitor
    (2011) SA, Claudia Cristina de; KISHI, Humberto Setsuo; SILVA-WERNECK, Ana Luiza; MORAES-FILHO, Joaquim Prado Pinto de; EISIG, Jaime Natan; BARBUTI, Ricardo Correa; HASHIMOTO, Claudio Lyioti; NAVARRO-RODRIGUEZ, Tomas
    BACKGROUND: TREATMEN The contribution of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) to refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains unknown. When EoE and GERD overlap, the clinical, endoscopic and histological findings are nonspecific and cannot be used to distinguish between the two disorders. Limited data are available on this topic, and the interaction between EoE and GERD is a matter of debate. AIM: We have conducted a prospective study of adult patients with refractory GERD to evaluate the overlap of reflux and EoE. METHODS: Between July 2006 and June 2008, we consecutively and prospectively enrolled 130 male and female patients aged 18 to 70 years old who experienced persistent heartburn and/or regurgitation more than twice a week over the last 30 days while undergoing at least six consecutive weeks of omeprazole treatment (at least 40 mg once a day). The patients underwent an upper digestive endoscopy with esophageal biopsy, and intraepithelial eosinophils were counted after hematoxylin/eosin staining. The diagnosis of EoE was based on the presence of 20 or more eosinophils per high-power field (eo/HPF) in esophageal biopsies. RESULTS: Among the 103 studied patients, 79 (76.7%) were females. The patients had a mean age of 45.5 years and a median age of 47 years. Endoscopy was normal in 83.5% of patients, and erosive esophagitis was found in 12.6%. Only one patient presented lesions suggestive of EoE. Histological examination revealed > 20 eo/HPF in this patient. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated a low prevalence of EoE among patients with refractory GERD undergoing omeprazole treatment.
  • bookPart
    Constipação intestinal funcional
    (2013) NAVARRO-RODRIGUEZ, Tomás; DIB, Ricardo Anuar; CHAVES, Renata Carvalho de Miranda; MORAES-FILHO, Joaquim Prado Pinto de
  • article 11 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Standard Triple Therapy versus Sequential Therapy in Helicobacter pylori Eradication: A Double-Blind, Randomized, and Controlled Trial
    (2015) EISIG, Jaime Natan; NAVARRO-RODRIGUEZ, Tomas; TEIXEIRA, Ana Cristina Sa; SILVA, Fernando Marcuz; MATTAR, Rejane; CHINZON, Decio; HARO, Christiane; DINIZ, Marcio Augusto; MORAES-FILHO, Joaquim Prado; FASS, Ronnie; BARBUTI, Ricardo Correa
    Aim. To compare 10-day standard triple therapy versus sequential therapy as first-line treatment in patients infected with H. pylori. Methods. One hundred H. pylori positive patients (diagnosed by rapid urease test and histology), with average age of 47.2, M/F = 28/72, were randomized to receive either standard triple treatment (TT) as follows: lansoprazole 30 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, and amoxicillin 1 g, b.i.d. for ten days, or sequential treatment (ST) as follows: lansoprazole 30 mg, amoxicillin and placebo 1.0 g b.i.d for the first five days, followed by lansoprazole 30 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, and tinidazole 500 mg b.i.d, for the remaining five days. Eradication rates were determined 60 days after treatment by urease, histology, or C-13-urea breath test. Results. In intention to treat (ITT) analysis, the rate of H. pylori eradication in the TT and ST groups was the same for both regimens as follows: 86% (43/50), 95% CI 93,3 to 73.4%. In Per protocol (PP) analysis, the rate of H. pylori eradication in the TT and ST groups was 87.8% (43/49), 95% CI 94,5 to 75.3% and 89.6% (43/48), 95% CI 95,8 to 77.3%, respectively. Conclusions. In Brazil, standard triple therapy is as equally effective as sequential therapy in eradicating Helicobacter pylori patients. This study was registered under Clinical Trials with number ISRCTN62400496.
  • conferenceObject
    Standard Triple Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Is Still the Best First Line Treatment in Brazil, Compared With Sequential Therapy: A Randomized, Prospective, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study
    (2014) EISIG, Jaime N.; NAVARRO-RODRIGUEZ, Tomas; TEIXEIRA, Ana Cristina; SILVA, Fernando M.; MATTAR, Rejane; CHINZON, Decio; MORAES-FILHO, Joaquim P.; HARO, Christiane; BARBUTI, Ricardo C.
  • article 58 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Association of a probiotic to a Helicobacter pylori eradication regimen does not increase efficacy or decreases the adverse effects of the treatment: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
    (2013) NAVARRO-RODRIGUEZ, Tomas; SILVA, Fernando Marcuz; BARBUTI, Ricardo Correa; MATTAR, Rejane; MORAES-FILHO, Joaquim Prado; OLIVEIRA, Marice Nogueira de; BOGSAN, Cristina S.; CHINZON, Decio; EISIG, Jaime Natan
    Background: The treatment for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is complex; full effectiveness is rarely achieved and it has many adverse effects. In developing countries, increased resistance to antibiotics and its cost make eradication more difficult. Probiotics can reduce adverse effects and improve the infection treatment efficacy. If the first-line therapy fails a second-line treatment using tetracycline, furazolidone and proton-pump inhibitors has been effective and low cost in Brazil; however it implies in a lot of adverse effects. The aim of this study was to minimize the adverse effects and increase the eradication rate applying the association of a probiotic compound to second-line therapy regimen. Methods: Patients with peptic ulcer or functional dyspepsia infected by H. pylori were randomized to treatment with the furazolidone, tetracycline and lansoprazole regimen, twice a day for 7 days. In a double-blind study, patients received placebo or a probiotic compound (Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Bifidobacterium bifidum and Streptococcus faecium) in capsules, twice a day for 30 days. A symptom questionnaire was administered in day zero, after completion of antibiotic therapy, after the probiotic use and eight weeks after the end of the treatment. Upper digestive endoscopy, histological assessment, rapid urease test and breath test were performed before and eight weeks after eradication treatment. Results: One hundred and seven patients were enrolled: 21 men with active probiotic and 19 with placebo plus 34 women with active probiotic and 33 with placebo comprising a total of 55 patients with active probiotic and 52 with placebo. Fifty-one patients had peptic ulcer and 56 were diagnosed as functional dyspepsia. The per-protocol eradication rate with active probiotic was 89.8% and with placebo, 85.1% (p = 0.49); per intention to treat, 81.8% and 79.6%, respectively (p = 0.53). The rate of adverse effects at 7 days with the active probiotic was 59.3% and 71.2% with placebo (p = 0.20). At 30 days, it was 44.9% and 60.4%, respectively (p = 0.08). Conclusions: The use of this probiotic compound compared to placebo in the proposed regimen in Brazilian patients with peptic ulcer or functional dyspepsia showed no significant difference in efficacy or adverse effects.