ALEXANDER ROBERTO PRECIOSO

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
13
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto da Criança, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
LIM/36 - Laboratório de Pediatria Clínica, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
  • article 25 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Development of standard clinical endpoints for use in dengue interventional trials
    (2018) TOMASHEK, Kay M.; WILLS, Bridget; LUM, Lucy Chai See; THOMAS, Laurent; DURBIN, Anna; LEO, Yee-Sin; BOSCH, Norma de; ROJAS, Elsa; HENDRICKX, Kim; ERPICUM, Martin; AGULTO, Liane; JAENISCH, Thomas; TISSERA, Hasitha; SUNTARATTIWONG, Piyarat; COLLERS, Beth Ann; WALLACE, Derek; SCHMIDT, Alexander C.; PRECIOSO, Alexander; NARVAEZ, Federico; THOMAS, Stephen J.; EDELMAN, Robert; SIQUEIRA, Joao Bosco; CASSETTI, M. Cristina; DEMPSEY, Walla; GUBLER, Duane J.
    Dengue is a major public health problem worldwide. Although several drug candidates have been evaluated in randomized controlled trials, none has been effective and at present, early recognition of severe dengue and timely supportive care are used to reduce mortality. While the first dengue vaccine was recently licensed, and several other candidates are in late stage clinical trials, future decisions regarding widespread deployment of vaccines and/or therapeutics will require evidence of product safety, efficacy and effectiveness. Standard, quantifiable clinical endpoints are needed to ensure reproducibility and comparability of research findings. To address this need, we established a working group of dengue researchers and public health specialists to develop standardized endpoints and work towards consensus opinion on those endpoints. After discussion at two working group meetings and presentations at international conferences, a Delphi methodology-based query was used to finalize and operationalize the clinical endpoints. Participants were asked to select the best endpoints from proposed definitions or offer revised/new definitions, and to indicate whether contributing items should be designated as optional or required. After the third round of inquiry, 70% or greater agreement was reached on moderate and severe plasma leakage, moderate and severe bleeding, acute hepatitis and acute liver failure, and moderate and severe neurologic disease. There was less agreement regarding moderate and severe thrombocytopenia and moderate and severe myocarditis. Notably, 68% of participants agreed that a 50,000 to 20,000 mm(3) platelet range be used to define moderate thrombocytopenia; however, they remained divided on whether a rapid decreasing trend or one platelet count should be case defining. While at least 70% agreement was reached on most endpoints, the process identified areas for further evaluation and standardization within the context of ongoing clinical studies. These endpoints can be used to harmonize data collection and improve comparability between dengue clinical trials.
  • article 4 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Dengue illness index-A tool to characterize the subjective dengue illness experience
    (2018) THOMAS, Stephen J.; AGULTO, Liane; HENDRICKX, Kim; ERPICUM, Martin; TOMASHEK, Kay M.; CASSETTI, M. Cristina; LAUGHLIN, Catherine; PRECIOSO, Alexander; SCHMIDT, Alexander C.; NARVAEZ, Federico; SIQUEIRA, Joao Bosco; TISSERA, Hasitha; EDELMAN, Robert
    Dengue virus infections are a major cause of febrile illness that significantly affects individual and societal productivity and drives up health care costs principally in the developing world. Two dengue vaccine candidates are in advanced clinical efficacy trials in Latin America and Asia, and another has been licensed in more than fifteen countries but its uptake has been limited. Despite these advances, standardized metrics for comparability of protective efficacy between dengue vaccines remain poorly defined. The Dengue Illness Index (DII) is a tool that we developed thru refinement of previous similar iterations in an attempt to improve and standardize the measurement of vaccine and drug efficacy in reducing moderate dengue illness. The tool is designed to capture an individual's overall disease experience based on how the totality of their symptoms impacts their general wellness and daily functionality. We applied the DII to a diary card, the Dengue Illness Card (DIC), which was examined and further developed by a working group. The card was then refined with feedback garnered from a Delphi methodology-based query that addressed the adequacy and applicability of the tool in clinical dengue research. There was overall agreement that the tool would generate useful data and provide an alternative perspective to the assessment of drug or vaccine candidates, which in the case of vaccines, are assessed by their reduction in any virologically confirmed dengue of any severity with a focus on the more severe. The DIC needs to be evaluated in the field in the context of vaccine or drug trials, prospective cohort studies, or during experimental human infection studies. Here, we present the final DIC resulting from the Delphi process and offer its further development or use to the dengue research community.