THIAGO JUNQUEIRA AVELINO DA SILVA
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto Central, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
LIM/66, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Líder
LIM/66, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Líder
40 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 10 de 40
- Clinical and laboratory characteristics associated with referral of hospitalized elderly to palliative care(2018) ARCANJO, Suelen Pereira; SAPORETTI, Luis Alberto; CURIATI, Jose Antonio Esper; JACOB-FILHO, Wilson; AVELINO-SILVA, Thiago JunqueiraObjective: To investigate clinical and laboratory characteristics associated with referral of acutely ill older adults to exclusive palliative care. Methods: A retrospective cohort study based on 572 admissions of acutely ill patients aged 60 years or over to a university hospital located in Sao Paulo, Brazil, from 2009 to 2013. The primary outcome was the clinical indication for exclusive palliative care. Comprehensive geriatric assessments were used to measure target predictors, such as sociodemographic, clinical, cognitive, functional and laboratory data. Stepwise logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of palliative care. Results: Exclusive palliative care was indicated in 152 (27%) cases. In the palliative care group, in-hospital mortality and 12 month cumulative mortality amounted to 50% and 66%, respectively. Major conditions prompting referral to palliative care were advanced dementia (45%), cancer (38%), congestive heart failure (25%), stage IV and V renal dysfunction (24%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (8%) and cirrhosis (4%). Major complications observed in the palliative care group included delirium (p<0.001), infections (p<0.001) and pressure ulcers (p<0.001). Following multivariate analysis, male sex (OR=2.12; 95% CI: 1.32-3.40), cancer (OR=7.36; 95% CI: 4.26-13.03), advanced dementia (OR=12.6; 95% CI: 7.5-21.2), and albumin levels (OR=0.25; 95% CI: 0.17-0.38) were identified as independent predictors of referral to exclusive palliative care. Conclusion: Advanced dementia and cancer were the major clinical conditions associated with referral of hospitalized older adults to exclusive palliative care. High short-term mortality suggests prognosis should be better assessed and discussed with patients and families in primary care settings.
- Applicability of the GLIM criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition in older adults in the emergency ward: A pilot validation study(2021) FERNANDEZ, Shirley Steffany Munoz; GARCEZ, Flavia Barreto; ALENCAR, Julio Cesar Garcia de; CEDERHOLM, Tommy; APRAHAMIAN, Ivan; MORLEY, John Edward; SOUZA, Heraldo Possolo de; SILVA, Thiago Junqueira Avelino da; RIBEIRO, Sandra Maria LimaBackground & aims: Acutely ill older adults are at higher risk of malnutrition. This study aimed to explore the applicability and accuracy of the GLIM criteria to diagnose malnutrition in acutely ill older adults in the emergency ward (EW). Methods: We performed a retrospective secondary analysis, of an ongoing cohort study, in 165 participants over 65 years of age admitted to the EW of a Brazilian university hospital. Nutrition assessment included anthropometry, the Simplified Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ), the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST), and the Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA). We diagnosed malnutrition using GLIM criteria, defined by the parallel presence of at least one phenotypic [nonvolitional weight loss (WL), low BMI, low muscle mass (MM)] and one etiologic criterion [reduced food intake or assimilation (RFI), disease burden/inflammation]. We used the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and Cox and logistic regression for data analyses. Results: GLIM criteria, following the MNA-SF screening, classified 50.3% of participants as malnourished, 29.1% of them in a severe stage. Validation of the diagnosis using MNA-FF as a reference showed good accuracy (AUC = 0.84), and moderate sensitivity (76%) and specificity (75.1%). All phenotypic criteria combined with RFI showed the best metrics. Malnutrition showed a trend for an increased risk of transference to intensive care unit (OR = 2.08, 95% CI 0.99, 4.35), and severe malnutrition for in-hospital mortality (HR = 4.23, 95% CI 1.2, 14.9). Conclusion: GLIM criteria, following MNA-SF screening, appear to be a feasible approach to diagnose malnutrition in acutely ill older adults in the EW. Nonvolitional WL combined with RFI or acute inflammation were the best components identified and are easily accessible, allowing their potential use in clinical practice.
- Comprehensive geriatric assessment predicts mortality and adverse outcomes in hospitalized older adults(2014) AVELINO-SILVA, Thiago J.; FARFEL, Jose M.; CURIATI, Jose A. E.; AMARAL, Jose R. G.; CAMPORA, Flavia; JACOB-FILHO, WilsonBackground: Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) provides detailed information on clinical, functional and cognitive aspects of older patients and is especially useful for assessing frail individuals. Although a large proportion of hospitalized older adults demonstrate a high level of complexity, CGA was not developed specifically for this setting. Our aim was to evaluate the application of a CGA model for the clinical characterization and prognostic prediction of hospitalized older adults. Methods: This was a prospective observational study including 746 patients aged 60 years and over who were admitted to a geriatric ward of a university hospital between January 2009 and December 2011, in Sao Paulo, Brazil. The proposed CGA was applied to evaluate all patients at admission. The primary outcome was in-hospital death, and the secondary outcomes were delirium, nosocomial infections, functional decline and length of stay. Multivariate binary logistic regression was performed to assess independent factors associated with these outcomes, including socio-demographic, clinical, functional, cognitive, and laboratory variables. Impairment in ten CGA components was particularly investigated: polypharmacy, activities of daily living (ADL) dependency, instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) dependency, depression, dementia, delirium, urinary incontinence, falls, malnutrition, and poor social support. Results: The studied patients were mostly women (67.4%), and the mean age was 80.5 +/- 7.9 years. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed the following independent factors associated with in-hospital death: IADL dependency (OR= 4.02; CI= 1.52-10.58; p= .005); ADL dependency (OR= 2.39; CI= 1.25-4.56; p= .008); malnutrition (OR= 2.80; CI= 1.63-4.83; p< .001); poor social support (OR= 5.42; CI= 2.93-11.36; p< .001); acute kidney injury (OR= 3.05; CI= 1.78-5.27; p< .001); and the presence of pressure ulcers (OR= 2.29; CI= 1.04-5.07; p= .041). ADL dependency was independently associated with both delirium incidence and nosocomial infections (respectively: OR= 3.78; CI= 2.30-6.20; p< .001 and OR= 2.30; CI= 1.49-3.49; p< .001). The number of impaired CGA components was also found to be associated with in-hospital death (p< .001), delirium incidence (p< .001) and nosocomial infections (p= .005). Additionally, IADL dependency, malnutrition and history of falls predicted longer hospitalizations. There were no significant changes in overall functional status during the hospital stay. Conclusions: CGA identified patients at higher risk of in-hospital death and adverse outcomes, of which those with functional dependence, malnutrition and poor social support were foremost.
- Safety profile of the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine: Pooled analysis of two large randomised phase 3 trials(2019) LOPEZ-FAUQUED, Marta; CAMPORA, Laura; DELANNOIS, Frederique; IDRISSI, Mohamed El; OOSTVOGELS, Lidia; LOOZE, Ferdinandus J. De; DIEZ-DOMINGO, Javier; HEINEMAN, Thomas C.; LAL, Himal; MCELHANEY, Janet E.; MCNEIL, Shelly A.; YEO, Wilfred; TAVARES-DA-SILVA, Fernanda; AHONEN, Anitta; AVELINO-SILVA, Thiago Junquera; BARBA-GOMEZ, Jose Fernando; BERGLUND, Johan; CUIXART, Carlos Brotons; CASO, Covadonga; CHLIBEK, Roman; CHOI, Won Suk; CUNNINGHAM, Anthony L.; DESOLE, Maria Guiseppina; EIZENBERG, Peter; ESEN, Meral; ESPIE, Emmanuelle; GERVAIS, Pierre; GHESQUIERE, Wayne; GODEAUX, Olivier; GORFINKEL, Iris; HUI, David Shu Cheong; HWANG, Shinn-Jang; KORHONEN, Tiina; KOVAC, Martina; LEDENT, Edouard; LEUNG, Edward; LEVIN, Myron J.; PEREZ, Silvia Narejos; NETO, Jose Luiz; PAUKSENS, Karlis; PODER, Airi; PINTA, Maria Luisa Rodriguez de la; ROMBO, Lars; SCHWARZ, Tino F.; SMETANA, Jan; STANISCIA, Tommaso; TINOCO, Juan Carlos; TOMA, Azhar; VASTIAU, Ilse; VESIKARI, Timo; VOLPI, Antonio; WATANABE, Daisuke; WECKX, Lily Yin; ZAHAF, ToufikBackground: The ZOE-50 (NCT01165177) and ZOE-70 (NCT01165229) phase 3 clinical trials showed that the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) was >= 90% efficacious in preventing herpes zoster in adults. Here we present a comprehensive overview of the safety data from these studies. Methods: Adults aged >= 50 (ZOE-50) and >= 70 (ZOE-70) years were randomly vaccinated with RZV or placebo. Safety analyses were performed on the pooled total vaccinated cohort, consisting of participants receiving at least one dose of RZV or placebo. Solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) were collected for 7 and 30 days after each vaccination, respectively. Serious AEs (SAEs) were collected from the first vaccination until 12 months post-last dose. Fatal AEs, vaccination-related SAEs, and potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs) were collected during the entire study period. Results: Safety was evaluated in 14,645 RZV and 14,660 placebo recipients. More RZV than placebo recipients reported unsolicited AEs (50.5% versus 32.0%); the difference was driven by transient injection site and solicited systemic reactions that were generally seen in the first week post-vaccination. The occurrence of overall SAEs (RZV: 10.1%; Placebo: 10.4%), fatal AEs (RZV: 4.3%; Placebo: 4.6%), and pIMDs (RZV: 1.2%; Placebo: 1.4%) was balanced between groups. The occurrence of possible exacerbations of pIMDs was rare and similar between groups. Overall, except for the expected local and systemic symptoms, the safety results were comparable between the RZV and Placebo groups irrespective of participant age, gender, or race. Conclusions: No safety concerns arose, supporting the favorable benefit-risk profile of RZV. (C) 2019 GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA.
- Transforming the invisible into the visible: disparities in the access to health in LGBT plus older people(2023) CRENITTE, Milton Roberto Furst; MELO, Leonardo Rabelo de; JACOB-FILHO, Wilson; AVELINO-SILVA, Thiago JunqueiraObjectives: To compare variables of access to healthcare between the LGBT+ population aged 50 and over and those non-LGBT+.Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out in Brazil through a confidential online questionnaire. The use of the health system was characterized by the number of preventive tests performed and measured by the PCATool-Brasil scale (a 10-point scale in which higher scores were associated with better assistance in healthcare). The association between being LGBT+ and access to health was analyzed in Poisson regression models.Results: 6693 participants (1332 LGBT+ and 5361 non-LGBT+) with a median age of 60 years were included. In the univariate analysis, it was observed not only lower scores on the PCATool scale (5.13 against 5.82, p < 0.001), but a greater proportion of individuals among those classified with the worst quintile of access to healthcare (< 4 points), 31% against 18% (p < 0.001). Being LGBT+ was an independent factor associated with worse access to health (PR = 2.5, 95% CI 2.04-3.06). The rate of screening cancer, for breast, colon, and cervical cancer was also found to be lower in the LGBT+ population. Conclusion: Healthcare access and health service experiences were worse in the LGBT+ group than in their non-LGBT peers. Inclusive and effective healthcare public policies are essential to promote healthy aging for all.
- Diagnostic discrepancies between emergency department admissions and hospital discharges among older adults: secondary analysis on a population-based survey(2020) AVELINO-SILVA, Thiago Junqueira; STEINMAN, Michael AlanBACKGROUND: Older adults frequently experience nonspecific clinical features. However, there is limited evidence on how often admission diagnoses for hospitalized older patients are incorrect, potentially leading to treatment delays. OBJECTIVES: To determine the consistency between hospital admission and discharge diagnoses, and identify factors associated with diagnostic discrepancies in older adults. DESIGN AND SETTING: Population-based cohort study in the United States. We included adults aged >= 18 years who were admitted from emergency departments (EDs) to hospitals, identified using the 2005-2010 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Survey, a nationally representative survey. METHODS:Three admission diagnoses and the principal discharge diagnosis were captured and classified as discrepant if they involved considerably different conditions within the same organ system, or different organ systems altogether. RESULTS: Each year, 12 million adults were hospitalized following ED visits in the United States; 45% were aged >= 65 years. These patients' mean age was 79 years and 58% were women. Diagnostic discrepancies between admission and discharge were more common among adults >= 65 years (12.5 versus 83%; P < 0.001). Certain admission diagnoses had particularly high rates of diagnostic discrepancies: 26-27% of patients presenting with mental disorders or with endocrine and metabolic diseases had substantial diagnostic discrepancies between admission and discharge. Substantial diagnostic discrepancy was independently associated with longer hospitalization and higher in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: One out of eight older adults hospitalized from EDs was discharged with a principal diagnosis differing considerably from the admission diagnosis. Given that missed or delayed diagnoses are a critical safety problem, clinicians should be vigilant and frequently cogitate alternative diagnostic possibilities.
- Dissipating the fog: Cognitive trajectories and risk factors 1 year after COVID-19 hospitalization(2023) GONCALVES, Natalia Gomes; ALIBERTI, Marlon Juliano Romero; BERTOLA, Laiss; AVELINO-SILVA, Thiago; DIAS, Murilo Bacchini; APOLINARIO, Daniel; BUSATTO, Geraldo; FORLENZA, Orestes; NITRINI, Ricardo; BRUCKI, Sonia Maria Dozzi; BRUNONI, Andre Russowsky; VIDAL, Kallene Summer Moreira; JACOB-FILHO, Wilson; SUEMOTO, Claudia KimieIntroduction: Cognitive impairment is common after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. However, associations between post-hospital discharge risk factors and cognitive trajectories have not been explored. Methods: A total of 1105 adults (mean age SD 64.9 9.9 years, 44% women, 63% White) with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were evaluated for cognitive function 1 year after hospital discharge. Scores from cognitive tests were harmonized, and clusters of cognitive impairment were defined using sequential analysis. Results: Three groups of cognitive trajectories we re observed during the follow-up: no cognitive impairment, initial short-term cognitive impairment, and long-term cognitive impairment. Predictors of cognitive decline after COVID-19 were older age (beta = -0.013, 95% CI = -0.023;-0.003), female sex (beta = -0.230, 95% CI = -0.413;-0.047), previous dementia diagnosis or substantial memory complaints (beta = -0.606, 95% CI = -0.877;-0.335), frailty before hospitalization (beta = -0.191, 95% CI = -0.264;-0.119), higher platelet count (beta = -0.101, 95% CI = -0.185;-0.018), and delirium (beta = -0.483, 95% CI = -0.724;-0.244). Post-discharge predictors included hospital readmissions and frailty. Discussion: Cognitive impairment was common and the patterns of cognitive trajectories depended on sociodemographic, in-hospital, and post-hospitalization predictors. Highlights Cognitive impairment after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) hospital discharge was associated with higher age, less education, delirium during hospitalization, a higher number of hospitalizations post discharge, and frailty before and after hospitalization. Frequent cognitive evaluations for 12-month post-COVID-19 hospitalization showed three possible cognitive trajectories: no cognitive impairment, initial short-term impairment, and long-term impairment. This study highlights the importance of frequent cognitive testing to determine patterns of COVID-19 cognitive impairment, given the high frequency of incident cognitive impairment 1 year after hospitalization.
- Prediction of intensive care admission and hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients using demographics and baseline laboratory data(2023) AVELINO-SILVA, Vivian I.; AVELINO-SILVA, Thiago J.; ALIBERTI, Marlon J. R.; FERREIRA, Juliana C.; COBELLO JUNIOR, Vilson; SILVA, Katia R.; POMPEU, Jose E.; ANTONANGELO, Leila; MAGRI, Marcello M.; BARROS FILHO, Tarcisio E. P.; SOUZA, Heraldo P.; KALLAS, Esper G.Introduction: Optimized allocation of medical resources to patients with COVID-19 has been a critical concern since the onset of the pandemic.Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, the authors used data from a Brazilian tertiary university hospital to explore predictors of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission and hospital mortality in patients admitted for COVID19. Our primary aim was to create and validate prediction scores for use in hospitals and emergency departments to aid clinical decisions and resource allocation. Results: The study cohort included 3,022 participants, of whom 2,485 were admitted to the ICU; 1968 survived, and 1054 died in the hospital. From the complete cohort, 1,496 patients were randomly assigned to the derivation sample and 1,526 to the validation sample. The final scores included age, comorbidities, and baseline laboratory data. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were very similar for the derivation and validation samples. Scores for ICU admission had a 75% accuracy in the validation sample, whereas scores for death had a 77% accuracy in the validation sample. The authors found that including baseline flu-like symptoms in the scores added no significant benefit to their accuracy. Furthermore, our scores were more accurate than the previously published NEWS-2 and 4C Mortality Scores.Discussion and conclusions: The authors developed and validated prognostic scores that use readily available clinical and laboratory information to predict ICU admission and mortality in COVID-19. These scores can become valuable tools to support clinical decisions and improve the allocation of limited health resources.
- Twelve Months and Counting: Following Clinical Outcomes in Critical COVID-19 Survivors(2023) TANIGUCHI, Leandro U.; ALIBERTI, Marlon J. R.; DIAS, Murilo B.; JACOB-FILHO, Wilson; AVELINO-SILVA, Thiago J.Rationale: Recent reports suggest that patients with severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) often experience long-term consequences of the infection. However, studies on intensive care unit (ICU) survivors are underrepresented. Objectives: We aimed to explore 12-month clinical outcomes after critical COVID-19, describing the longitudinal progress of disabilities, frailty status, frequency of cognitive impairment, and clinical events (rehospitalization, institutionalization, and falls). Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study of survivors of COVID-19 ICU admissions in Sao Paulo, Brazil. We assessed patients every 3 months for 1 year after hospital discharge and obtained information on 15 activities of daily living (basic, instrumental, and mobility activities), frailty, cognition, and clinical events. Results: We included 428 patients (mean age of 64 yr, 61% required invasive mechanical ventilation during ICU stay). The number of disabilities peaked at 3 months compared with the pre-COVID-19 period (mean difference, 2.46; 99% confidence interval, 1.94-2.99) and then decreased at 12 months (mean difference, 0.67; 99% confidence interval, 0.28-1.07). At 12-month follow-up, 12% of patients were frail, but half of them presented frailty only after COVID-19. The prevalence of cognitive symptoms was 17% at 3 months and progressively decreased to 12.1% (P = 0.012 for trend) at the end of 1 year. Clinical events occurred in all assessments. Conclusions: Although a higher burden of disabilities and cognitive symptoms occurred 3 months after hospital discharge of critical COVID-19 survivors, a significant improvement occurred during the 1-year follow-up. However, one-third of the patients remained in worse conditions than their pre-COVID-19 status.
- The Impact of Frailty on the Relationship between Life-Space Mobility and Quality of Life in Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic(2021) SARAIVA, M. D.; APOLINARIO, D.; AVELINO-SILVA, T. J.; TAVARES, C. De Assis Moura; GATTAS-VERNAGLIA, I. F.; FERNANDES, C. Marques; RABELO, L. M.; YAMAGUTI, S. Tavares Fernandes; KARNAKIS, T.; KALIL-FILHO, R.; JACOB-FILHO, W.; ALIBERTI, Marlon Juliano RomeroBackground The COVID-19 pandemic has led to abrupt restrictions of lile-space mobility. The impact of shelter-in-place orders on older adults' health and well-being is still unclear. Objective To investigate the relationship between life-space mobility and quality of life (QoL) in older adults with and without frailty during the COVID-19 pandemic. Design Multicenter prospective cohort study based on structured telephone interviews. Setting Four geriatric outpatient clinics in the metropolitan area of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Participants 557 community-dwelling adults aged 60 years and older. Measurements The Life-Space Assessment was used to measure community mobility before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, and a previously validated decrease of >= 5 points defined restricted life-space mobility. Frailty was assessed through the FRAIL (fatigue, resistance, ambulation, illnesses, and loss of weight) scale. The impact of shelter-in-place orders on QoL was evaluated with the question << How is the COVID-19 pandemic affecting your QoL?>>, to which participants could respond << not at all >>, << to some extent >>, or << to a great extent >>. We used ordinal logistic regressions to investigate the relationship between restricted life-space mobility and impact on QoL, adjusting our analyses for demographics, frailty, comorbidities, cognition, functionality, loneliness, depression, and anxiety. We explored whether frailty modified the association between life-space mobility and impact on QoL. Results Participants were on average 80 +/- 8 years old, 65% were women, and 33% were frail. The COVID-19 quarantine led to a restriction of community mobility in 79% of participants and affected the QoL for 77% of participants. We found that restricted life-space mobility was associated with impact on QoL in older adults during the pandemic, although frailty modified the magnitude of the association (P-value for interaction=0.03). Frail participants who experienced restricted life-space mobility had twice the odds of reporting an impact on QoL when compared with non-frail individuals, with respective adjusted odds ratios of 4.20 (95% CI=2.36-7.50) and 2.18 (95% CI=1.33-3.58). Conclusion Older adults experienced substantial decreases in life-space mobility during the COVID-19 pandemic, and this unexpected change impacted their QoL. Providers should be particularly watchful for the consequences of abrupt life-space restrictions on frail individuals.