FERNANDO NALESSO AGUIAR

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
6
Lattes
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico

Filtros

Limpar filtros

Configurações

Assunto: Pathology ×

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 3 de 3
  • article 0 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Pathological macroscopic evaluation of breast density versus mammographic breast density in breast cancer conserving surgery
    (2023) REIS, Yedda Nunes; MOTA, Bruna Salani; MOTA, Rosa Maria Salani; SHIMIZU, Carlos; RICCI, Marcos Desiderio; AGUIAR, Fernando Nalesso; SOARES-JR, Jose Maria; BARACAT, Edmund Chada; FILASSI, Jose Roberto
    Correlation between imaging and anatomopathological breast density has been superficially explored and is heterogeneous in current medical literature. It is possible that mammographic and pathological findings are divergent. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between breast density classified by mammography and breast density of pathological macroscopic examination in specimens of breast cancer conservative surgeries. Post-hoc, exploratory analysis of a prospective randomized clinical trial of patients with breast cancer candidates for breast conservative surgery. Breast mammographic density (MD) was analyzed according to ACR BI-RADS (R) criteria, and pathologic macroscopic evaluation of breast density (PMBD) was estimated by visually calculating the ratio between stromal and fatty tissue. From 412 patients, MD was A in 291 (70,6%), B in 80 (19,4%) B, C in 35 (8,5%), and D in 6 (1,5%). Ninety-nine percent (201/203) of patients classified as A+B in MD were correspondently classified in PMBD. Conversely, only 18.7% (39/209) of patients with MD C+D were classified correspondently in PMBD (p < 0.001). Binary logistic regression showed age (OR 1.06, 1.01-1.12 95% CI, p 0.013) and nulliparity (OR 0.39, 0.17-0.96 95% CI, p 0.039) as predictors of A+B PMBD.Conclusion: Mammographic and pathologic macroscopic breast density showed no association in our study for breast C or D in breast image. The fatty breast was associated with older patients and the nulliparity decreases the chance of fatty breasts nearby 60%.
  • conferenceObject
    An uncommon beta catenin gene deletion in a breast desmoid-type fibromatosis
    (2017) SOARES, I. Cauduro; VASCONCELOS, M. A. Pereira Silva; LIMA, L. G. Cernaglia Aureliano de; BATISTA, R. Pedroso; AGUIAR, F. Nalesso; SHIMIZU, C.; RICCI, M. Desiderio; FILASSI, J. R.
  • article 6 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Validation of the Residual Cancer Burden Index as a prognostic tool in women with locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    (2023) CUNHA, Juliana Pierobon Gomes da; GONCALVES, Rodrigo; SILVA, Fernando; AGUIAR, Fernando Nalesso; MOTA, Bruna Salani; CHEQUIM, Bruna Bello; SOARES, Jose Maria; BARACAT, Edmund C.; FILASSI, Jose Roberto
    Aims To correlate the 'Residual Cancer Burden' (RCB) index with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in women undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy at the Cancer Institute of the State of Sao Paulo. Methods We analysed the medical records of patients with breast cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and breast surgery, from 2011 to December 2017. Variables analysed were age, clinical and pathological staging, molecular subtype, number of recurrences or metastases, number of deaths, value and class of the RCB index. We used the Kaplan-Meier and the log-rank statistics to evaluate the possible association between RCB and OS and DFS. A regression model was used to determine the independent association of the RCB with the outcomes controlling for confounding factors. Results 347 patients were included in the analysis with a mean age of 49.39 years. Initial clinical staging was T3 in 57.9% of patients and 43.8% of patients had N1 axillary status. Survival analysis showed a statistically significant better prognosis for the RCB 0 (pCR) subgroup compared with RCB 1, 2 and 3 (log rank p=0.01). In a multivariate analysis, only the RCB classification showed a statistically significant correlation with DFS (RCB 1, HR 6.9, CI 1.9 to 25.4, p=0.004; RCB 2, HR 4.2, CI 1.6 to 10.8, p=0.03; and RCB 3, HR 7.6, CI 2.76 to 20.8, p=0.00). Conclusion We demonstrated a positive and significant relationship between the RCB index and the risk of relapse and death.