RODRIGO MOREL VIEIRA DE MELO

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
5
Lattes
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais

Filtros

Limpar filtros

Configurações

Indexador: SciELO ×

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
  • article 0 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Utilidade clínica da angiografia coronária e da ressonância nuclear magnética no diagnóstico da cardiomiopatia isquêmica
    (2013) MELO, Eduardo França Pessoa de; CINTRA, Renata Ávila; BISELLI, Bruno; MELO, Rodrigo Morel Vieira de; RIBEIRO, Henrique Barbosa; ÁVILA, Luis Francisco; LEMOS NETO, Pedro Alves; RIBEIRO, Expedito E.; BOCCHI, Edimar Alcides; SOUZA, Germano Emilio Conceição
    BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of ischemic cardiomyopathy is frequently difficult. Coronary angiography (CA) is limited because it is invasive and the evaluation is exclusively anatomic. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) measures patterns of myocardial fibrosis caused by ischemia. However, LGE does not detect ischemia that does not result in fibrosis. Thus, a thorough clinical evaluation by a cardiologist seems to be the most effective option for diagnosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate CA and LGE as complementary methods for the diagnosis of ischemic cardiomyopathy in patients with systolic heart failure of unknown etiology. METHODS: Patients with systolic heart failure, left ventricle ejection fraction < 45% and unknown etiology after initial non-invasive evaluation were submitted to CA and MRI with LGE to define the etiology of the disease. Patient evaluation by two cardiologists was the gold standard for the diagnosis of ischemic cardiomyopathy. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were included. The sensitivity to detect ischemic cardiomyopathy was 0.45 for CA vs. 0.81 for LGE. The specificity was 1.0 for CA vs. 0.84 for LGE. The positive predictive value was 1.0 vs. 0.81 and the negative predictive value was 0.68 vs. 0.84 for CA and LGE, respectively. LGE accuracy was superior to CA accuracy (0.83 vs. 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: LGE was more sensitive than CA to evaluate the etiology of ventricular dysfunction, whereas CA was more specific. The diagnosis of ischemic cardiomyopathy using each one of the methods separately presented limitations.