ANA CRISTINA DE MEDEIROS RIBEIRO

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
19
Lattes
ResearcherID
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto Central, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
LIM/17 - Laboratório de Investigação em Reumatologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina

Filtros

Limpar filtros

Configurações

Revista / Livro: Rheumatology ×

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 8 de 8
  • article 13 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Strong response after fourth dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in autoimmune rheumatic diseases patients with poor response to inactivated vaccine
    (2022) AIKAWA, Nadia E.; KUPA, Leonard V. K.; SILVA, Clovis A.; SAAD, Carla G. S.; PASOTO, Sandra G.; YUKI, Emily F. N.; FUSCO, Solange R. G.; SHINJO, Samuel K.; ANDRADE, Danieli C. O.; SAMPAIO-BARROS, Percival D.; PEREIRA, Rosa M. R.; CHASIN, Anna C. S.; SHIMABUCO, Andrea Y.; LUPPINO-ASSAD, Ana P.; LEON, Elaine P.; LOPES, Marta H.; ANTONANGELO, Leila; MEDEIROS-RIBEIRO, Ana C.; BONFA, Eloisa
    Objectives. To assess immunogenicity of a heterologous fourth dose of an mRNA (BNT162b2) severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine in autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARD) patients with poor/non-response to inactivated vaccine (Sinovac-CoronaVac). Methods. A total of 164 ARD patients who were coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) poor/non-responders (negative anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG and/or neutralizing antibodies-NAb) to the third dose of Sinovac-CoronaVac received an additional heterologous dose of mRNA (BNT162b2) 3 months after last dose. IgG and NAb were evaluated before and after the fourth dose. Results. Significant increases were observed after the fourth dose in IgG (66.4 vs 95.1%, P < 0.001), NAb positivity (5.5 vs 83.5%, P < 0.001) and geometric mean titre (29.5 vs 215.8 AU/ml, P < 0.001), and 28 (17.1%) remained poor/non-responders. Patients with negative IgG after a fourth dose were more frequently under rituximab (P = 0 .001) . Negative NAb was associated with older age (P = 0.015), RA (P = 0 .002) , SSc (P = 0 .026) , LEF (P = 0 .01 6) and rituximab use (P = 0.007) . In multiple logistic regression analysis, prednisone dose >= 7.5 mg/day (OR =0.34; P = 0.047) , LEF (OR =0.32, P = 0.036) and rituximab use (OR =0.19, P = 0.022) were independently associated with negative NAb after the fourth vaccine dose. Conclusions. This is the largest study to provide evidence of a remarkable humoral response after the fourth dose of heterologous mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in ARD patients with poor/non-response to the third dose of an inactivated vaccine. We further identified that treatment, particularly rituximab and prednisone, impaired antibody response to this additional dose.
  • article 12 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Systemic autoimmune myopathies: a prospective phase 4 controlled trial of an inactivated virus vaccine against SARS-CoV-2
    (2022) SHINJO, Samuel K.; SOUZA, Fernando H. C. de; BORGES, Isabela B. P.; SANTOS, Alexandre M. Dos; MIOSSI, Renata; MISSE, Rafael G.; MEDEIROS-RIBEIRO, Ana C.; SAAD, Carla G. S.; YUKI, Emily F. N.; PASOTO, Sandra G.; KUPA, Leonard V. K.; CENEVIVA, Carina; SERAPHIM, Julia C.; PEDROSA, Tatiana N.; VENDRAMINI, Margarete B. G.; SILVA, Clovis A.; AIKAWA, Nadia E.; BONFA, Eloisa
    Objectives. To evaluate immunogenicity and safety of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in systemic autoimmune myopathies (SAMs) and the possible influence of baseline disease parameters, comorbidities and therapy on immune response. Methods. This prospective controlled study included 53 patients with SAMs and 106 non-immunocompromised control group (CTRL). All participants received two doses of the Sinovac-CoronaVac vaccine (28-day interval). Immunogenicity was assessed by anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG seroconversion (SC), anti-S1/S2 IgG geometric mean titre (GMT), factor increase GMT (FI-GMT), neutralizing antibodies (NAb) positivity, and median neutralizing activity after each vaccine dose (D0 and D28) and six weeks after the second dose (D69). Participants with pre-vaccination positive IgG serology and/or NAb and those with RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19 during the protocol were excluded from immunogenicity analysis. Results. Patients and CTRL had comparable sex (P>0.99) and age (P=0.90). Immunogenicity of 37 patients and 79 CTRL-naive participants revealed at D69, a moderate but significantly lower SC (64.9% vs 91.1%, P<0.001), GMT [7.9 (95%CI 4.7-13.2) vs 24.7 (95%CI 30.0-30.5) UA/ml, P<0.001] and frequency of NAb (51.4% vs 77.2%, P<0.001) in SAMs compared with CTRL. Median neutralizing activity was comparable in both groups [57.2% (interquartile range (IQR) 43.4-83.4) vs 63.0% (IQR 40.3-80.7), P=0.808]. Immunosuppressives were less frequently used among NAb+ patients vs NAb- patients (73.7% vs 100%, P=0.046). Type of SAMs, disease status, other drugs or comorbidities did not influence immunogenicity. Vaccine-related adverse events were mild with similar frequencies in patients and CTRL (P>0.05). Conclusion. Sinovac-CoronaVac is safe and has a moderate short-term immunogenicity in SAMs, but reduced compared with CTRL. We further identified that immunosuppression is associated with diminished NAb positivity.
  • article 9 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients with systemic sclerosis: impact of disease subtype and therapy
    (2022) SAMPAIO-BARROS, Percival Degrava; MEDEIROS-RIBEIRO, Ana Cristina; LUPPINO-ASSAD, Ana Paula; MIOSSI, Renata; SILVA, Henrique Carrico da; YUKI, Emily F. V. N.; PASOTO, Sandra G.; SAAD, Carla G. S.; SILVA, Clovis A.; KUPA, Leonard V. K.; DEVEZA, Giordano B. H.; PEDROSA, Tatiana N.; AIKAWA, Nadia E.; BONFA, Eloisa
    Objective. To analyse the safety, immunogenicity and factors affecting antibody response to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination in patients with SSc. Methods. This is a phase 4 prospective study within a larger trial of two doses of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) in 51 SSc patients compared with 153 controls. Anti-SARS-CoV-2-IgG and neutralizing antibodies (NAb) were assessed at each vaccine shot (D0/D28) and 6 weeks after the second dose(D69), only in individuals with negative baseline IgG/NAb and those who did not have coronavirus-19(COVID19) during follow-up. Vaccine safety was also assessed in all participants. Results. Patients and controls had comparable median ages [48(38.5-57) vs 48(38-57) years, P =0.945]. Patients had mostly diffuse SSc (68.6%) and the majority (74.5%) had interstitial lung disease. Most patients were under immunosuppressive therapy (72.5%), mainly MMF (52.9%). After full vaccination (D69), anti-SARS-CoV-2-IgG frequency (64.1% vs 94.2%, P < 0.001) and NAb positivity (53.8% vs 76.9%; P =0.006) were moderate, although lower than controls. The first dose response (D28) was low and comparable for both seroconvertion rates (SC) (P =0.958) and NAb positivity (P =0.537). SSc patients under MMF monotherapy vs other (no therapy/other DMARDs) had lower immunogenicity (SC: 31.3% vs 90%, P < 0.001) and NAb(18.8% vs 85%, P < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis confirmed that MMF use, but not disease subtype, is associated with insufficient seroconversion [odds ratio (OR)=0.056(95% CI: 0.009, 0.034), P =0.002] and NAb positivity [OR =0.047(95% CI: 0.007, 0.036), P =0.002]. No moderate/severe side-effects were observed. Conclusion. CoronaVac has an excellent safety profile and moderate response to anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in SSc. Vaccine antibody response is not influenced by disease subtype and is greatly affected by MMF, reinforcing the need for additional strategies to up-modulate vaccine response in this subgroup of patients.
  • article 11 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Predictors of progression to systemic sclerosis: analysis of very early diagnosis of systemic sclerosis in a large single-centre cohort
    (2022) SIQUEIRA, Valdirene S.; HELBINGEN, Mariely F. S.; MEDEIROS-RIBEIRO, Ana Cristina; SILVA, Henrique Carrico da; MIOSSI, Renata; LUPPINO-ASSAD, Ana Paula; SAMPAIO-BARROS, Percival D.
    Objective This study analysed the very early disease of SSc (VEDOSS) characteristics in a group of 217 patients with RP and at least one manifestation of SSc in search of predictors for the progression to SSc. Methods This was a cross-sectional single-centre analysis of patients presenting with RP with a specific SSc clinical manifestation or SSc autoantibody or SD pattern at nailfold capillaroscopy (SD-NFC), without skin involvement, who attended a scleroderma outpatient clinic between 2010 and 2019. The performance of VEDOSS and the importance of the combination of VEDOSS characteristics to predict the progression to SSc were evaluated. Results Among 217 patients, 153 (70.5%) were classified as SSc, including 65 (30%) in the first investigation; 69.3% of the SSc patients met VEDOSS criteria compared with 6.3% of patients who did not progress to SSc. The combinations most associated with progression to SSc were RP + puffy fingers (PF) + positive ANA + SD-NFC and/or SSc-specific antibody (VEDOSS level 2), with an odds ratio (OR) of 19.52 (95% CI 4.48, 85.06; P < 0.001) and RP + PF + positive ANA (VEDOSS level 1; 'red flags') (OR 15.45; P < 0.001), while combinations without non-RP clinical symptoms, as RP + SD-NFC (OR 0.03; P < 0.001) and RP + anticentromere + SD-NFC (OR 0.06; P = 0.006) were associated with non-progression to SSc. Conclusion Among patients with RP with at least one manifestation of SSc, without skin involvement, combinations of VEDOSS characteristics were the strongest predictors of progression to SSc at a median follow-up of 4 years.
  • article 56 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Influenza A/H1N1 vaccination of patients with SLE: can antimalarial drugs restore diminished response under immunosuppressive therapy?
    (2012) BORBA, Eduardo F.; SAAD, Carla G. S.; PASOTO, Sandra G.; CALICH, Ana L. G.; AIKAWA, Nadia E.; RIBEIRO, Ana C. M.; MORAES, Julio C. B.; LEON, Elaine P.; COSTA, Luciana P.; GUEDES, Lissiane K. N.; SILVA, Clovis A. A.; GONCALVES, Celio R.; FULLER, Ricardo; OLIVEIRA, Suzimara A.; ISHIDA, Maria A.; PRECIOSO, Alexander R.; BONFA, Eloisa
    Objective. To assess the efficacy and safety of pandemic 2009 influenza A (H1N1) in SLE under different therapeutic regimens. Methods. A total of 555 SLE patients and 170 healthy controls were vaccinated with a single dose of a non-adjuvanted preparation. According to current therapy, patients were initially classified as SLE No Therapy (n = 75) and SLE with Therapy (n = 480). Subsequent evaluations included groups under monotherapy: chloroquine (CQ) (n = 105), prednisone (PRED) epsilon 20 mg (n = 76), immunosuppressor (IS) (n = 95) and those with a combination of these drugs. Anti-H1N1 titres and seroconversion (SC) rate were evaluated at entry and 21 days post-vaccination. Results. The SLE with Therapy group had lower SC compared with healthy controls (59.0 vs 80.0%; P < 0.0001), whereas the SLE No Therapy group had equivalent SC (72 vs 80.0%; P = 0.18) compared with healthy controls. Further comparison revealed that the SC of SLE No Therapy (72%) was similar to the CQ group (69.5%; P = 0.75), but it was significantly reduced in PRED epsilon 20 mg (53.9%; P = 0.028), IS (55.7%; P = 0.035) and PRED epsilon 20 mg + IS (45.4%; P = 0.038). The concomitant use of CQ in each of these later regimens was associated with SC responses comparable with SLE No Therapy group (72%): PRED epsilon 20 mg + CQ (71.4%; P = 1.00), IS + CQ (65.2%; P = 0.54) and PRED epsilon 20 mg + IS + CQ (57.4%; P = 0.09). Conclusion. Pandemic influenza A H1N1/2009 vaccine response is diminished in SLE under immunosuppressive therapy and antimalarials seems to restore this immunogenicity.
  • conferenceObject
    IS H1N1 INFLUENZA VACCINE SAFE AND EFFECTIVE IN PATIENTS WITH SSc?
    (2012) ANDRADE, D.; SEGURO, L.; RIBEIRO, A.; MORAES, J.; SAAD, C.; AIKAWA, N.; CALICH, A.; VIANA, V.; PASOTO, S.; LEVY-NETO, M.; LAURINDO, I.; TIMENESTSKY, M.; PRECIOSO, A.; BONFA, E.; SAMPAIO-BARROS, P.
    Introduction. Immunosuppressed patients are potentially at risk to suffer from life-threatening pulmonary infections caused by H1N1. Although pulmonary disease is an important cause of morbidity in patients with SSc, low rates of influenza vaccination are still observed in this population due to lack of information and fear of adverse events. The recent WHO recommendation that the 2010–2011 trivalent seasonal flu vaccine must contain A/California/7/2009/H1N1-like virus reinforces the need to access the safety and efficacy of H1N1 vaccination in SSc patients. Patients and methods. One hundred twenty-seven patients and 234 controls were vaccinated with adjuvant-free influenza A/California/7/2009 (pH1N1) vaccine. All participants were evaluated pre- and 21 days post-vaccination and serology for anti-H1N1 was performed by haemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay (HIA). Efficacy was assessed by seroprotection and seroconversion rates and the factor increase in geometric mean antibody titre (GMT). Participants received a 21-day symptom diary card and were instructed to report local and systemic adverse events. Severe side effects were considered if hospitalization was required. Results. SSc patients had mean age of 52 (5.3) years, mean disease duration of 11.96 (7.9) years and a female predominance (93%). Of SSc patients, 69.3% had limited cutaneous disease, whereas 30.7% had diffuse cutaneous disease. Half of the patients were on immunosuppressant therapy (mostly AZA, MTX and CYC). Thirteen (10%) patients were taking CSs, but only two patients received a daily dose > 10 mg of prednisone. SSc patients and controls presented similar pre-vaccination GMT (11.2 vs 9.3; P = 0.094) and seroprotection rates (18.1 vs. 11.5%; P = 0.110). After vaccination seroprotection rates (81.1 vs 82.9%; P = 0.668) and GMT (134.4 vs. 122.9; P = 0.654) rose in both groups. Seroconversion rates (72.4 vs 76.9%; P = 0.372) and factor increase in GMT (12.0 vs 13.2; P = 0.553) were comparable in both groups. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs were not associated with reduced vaccination responses (P > 0.05). Immunization was well tolerated with mild local (7.1 vs 14.1%; P = 0.058) and minor systemic reactions (23.6 vs 25.6%; P = 0.704) in patients and controls, respectively. No severe side effect was reported.Conclusion. Vaccination against H1N1 was safe and induced a satisfactory response in patients with SSc, including in those under immunosuppressive therapy. Due to the inherent risks of lower respiratory infections in this group of patients, physicians should consider annually influenza vaccination recommendation.
  • article 8 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Pandemic non-adjuvanted influenza A H1N1 vaccine in a cohort of patients with systemic sclerosis
    (2018) SAMPAIO-BARROS, Percival D.; ANDRADE, Danieli C. O.; SEGURO, Luciana C. P.; PASOTO, Sandra G.; VIANA, Vilma S. T.; RIBEIRO, Ana C. M.; AIKAWA, Nadia E.; TIMENETSKY, Maria do Carmo S.; PRECIOSO, Alexander R.; SILVA, Clovis A.; BONFA, Eloisa
    Objective. To assess the possible effect of therapy, disease subtype and severity on H1N1 immunogenicity in patients with SSc. Methods. Ninety-two patients and 92 age- and gender-matched healthy controls received adjuvant-free influenza A/California/7/2009 (pH1N1) vaccine. Blood samples were collected immediately before and 3 weeks after vaccination to evaluate antibody responses to the H1N1 virus. Efficacy was assessed by seroprotection (SP) and seroconversion (SC) rates and the factor increase in geometric mean antibody titre. Participants received a 21-day symptom diary card and were instructed to report local and systemic adverse events. Results. SSc patients were predominantly females (91 %) and 61 % had limited SSc, 12% had severe skin involvement and 57.6% were on immunosuppressive (IS) therapy. SSc patients and controls presented comparable overall SP (P=0.20) and SC (P=0.61) rates. Further evaluation of the possible effect of disease and therapy revealed similar rates of SP and SC in patients with dcSSc vs IcSSc (SP P =0.62 and SC P = 0.66), severe vs mild/moderate skin involvement (SP P=1 and SC P = 0.45) and with vs without IS (SP P = 0.26 and SC P=0.10). The frequency of mild local and minor systemic reactions was similar in patients with dcSSC vs IcSSc (P =0.70 vs 0.32) and in those with and without severe skin involvement (P = 0.59 vs 0.28). Conclusion. The non-adjuvanted influenza H1N1 virus vaccine proved to be safe and effective, independent of SSc clinical subtype, disease severity or therapy. These latter factors do not seem to contribute to mild adverse events observed in SSc. Our data support the annual influenza vaccination recommendation for these patients.
  • article 59 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    TNF blockers show distinct patterns of immune response to the pandemic influenza A H1N1 vaccine in inflammatory arthritis patients
    (2012) FRANCA, Ivan Leonardo Avelino; RIBEIRO, Ana Cristina Medeiros; AIKAWA, Nadia Emi; SAAD, Carla Goncalves Schain; MORAES, Julio Cesar Bertacine; GOLDSTEIN-SCHAINBERG, Claudia; LAURINDO, Ieda Maria Magalhaes; PRECIOSO, Alexander Roberto; ISHIDA, Maria Akiko; SARTORI, Ana Marli Christovam; SILVA, Clovis Artur; BONFA, Eloisa
    Methods. One hundred and twenty patients (RA, n = 41; AS, n = 57; PsA, n = 22) on anti-TNF agents (monoclonal, n = 94; soluble receptor, n = 26) were compared with 116 inflammatory arthritis patients under DMARDs and 117 healthy controls. Seroprotection, seroconversion (SC), geometric mean titre, factor increase in geometric mean titre and adverse events were evaluated 21 days after vaccination. Results. After immunization, SC rates (58.2% vs 74.3%, P = 0.017) were significantly lower in SpA patients receiving anti-TNF therapy, whereas no difference was observed in RA patients receiving this therapy compared with healthy controls (P = 0.067). SpA patients receiving mAbs (infliximab/adalimumab) had a significantly lower SC rate compared with healthy controls (51.6% vs 74.3%, P = 0.002) or those on DMARDs (51.6% vs 74.7%, P = 0.005), whereas no difference was observed for patients on etanercept (86.7% vs 74.3%, P = 0.091). Further analysis of non-seroconverting and seroconverting SpA patients revealed that the former group had a higher mean age (P = 0.003), a higher frequency of anti-TNF (P = 0.031) and mAbs (P = 0.001) and a lower frequency of MTX (P = 0.028). In multivariate logistic regression, only older age (P = 0.015) and mAb treatment (P = 0.023) remained significant factors for non-SC in SpA patients. Conclusion. This study revealed a distinct disease pattern of immune response to the pandemic influenza vaccine in inflammatory arthritis patients receiving anti-TNF agents, illustrated by a reduced immunogenicity solely in SpA patients using mAbs. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, ext-link-type=""uri"" xlink:href=""www.clinicaltrials.gov"" xmlns:xlink=""http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"">www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01151644.