MARIANA YUMI MIYADAHIRA
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
LIM/57 - Laboratório de Fisiologia Obstétrica, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
2 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
- Lung ultrasound versus chest computed tomography for pregnant inpatients with COVID-19(2023) BIANCOLIN, Sckarlet Ernandes; FERNANDES, Hermann dos Santos; SAWAMURA, Marcio Valente Yamada; QUEIROZ, Joelma; CENTOFANTI, Sandra Frankfurt; LIAO, Adolfo Wenjaw; LEITE, Claudia da Costa; FRANCISCO, Rossana Pulcineli Vieira; BRIZOT, Maria de Lourdes; BASSI, Aline Scalisse; FABRI, Amanda Wictky; SOUZA, Ana Claudia Rodrigues Lopes Amaral de; FARCHE, Ana Claudia Silva; IGAI, Ana Maria Kondo; OLIVEIRA, Ana Maria da Silva Sousa; WAISSMAN, Adriana Lippi; MARTINS, Carlos Eduardo do Nascimento; PAGANOTI, Cristiane de Freitas; DOMINGUES, Danielle Rodrigues; MIKAMI, Fernanda Cristina Ferreira; BAPTISTA, Fernanda Spadotto; CIPPICIANI, Jacqueline Kobayashi; ALBERTINI, Jessica Gorrao Lopes; NIIGAKI, Juliana Ikeda; GALLETTA, Marco Aurelio Knippel; MIYADAHIRA, Mariana Yumi; BARBOSA, Mariana Vieira; MAEDA, Mariane de Fatima Yukie; BARROS, Monica Fairbanks de; TAKIUTI, Nilton Hideto; MARTINELLI, Silvio; ARRYM, Tiago Pedromonico; GOMEZ, Ursula Trovato; FRANCO, Veridiana FreirePurpose To compare lung ultrasound (US) and computed tomography (CT) in the assessment of pregnant women with COVID-19. Methods Prospective study comprising 39 pregnant inpatients with COVID-19 who underwent pulmonary assessment with CT and US with a maximum span of 48 h between the exams. The thorax was divided into 12 regions and assessed in terms of the following: the presence of B-lines (>2), coalescent B-lines, consolidation on US; presence of interlobular thickening, ground glass, consolidation on CT. The two methods were scored by adding up the scores from each thoracic region. Results A significant correlation was found between the scores obtained by the two methods (rICC = 0.946; p < 0.001). They were moderately in agreement concerning the frequency of altered pulmonary regions (weighted kappa = 0.551). In US, a score over 15, coalescent B-lines, and consolidation were predictors of the need for oxygen, whereas the predictors in CT were a lung score over 16 and consolidation. The two methods, US (p < 0.001; AUC = 0.915) and CT (p < 0.001; AUC = 0.938), were fairly accurate in predicting the need for oxygen. Conclusion In pregnant women, lung US and chest CT are of similar accuracy in assessing lungs affected by COVID-19 and can predict the need for oxygen.
- Monitoring SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence over time among pregnant women admitted to delivery units: Suitability for surveillance(2023) MIYADAHIRA, Mariana Yumi; BRIZOT, Maria de Lourdes; ALEXANDER, Neal; SABINO, Ester Cerdeira; SILVA, Lea Campos de Oliveira da; HOSHIDA, Mara Sandra; OLIVEIRA, Ana Maria da Silva Sousa; FARCHE, Ana Claudia Silva; FRANCISCO, Rossana Pulcineli Vieira; MAYAUD, PhilippeObjectivesTo determine SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence over time and risk factors among pregnant women at delivery in Sao Paulo, Brazil; and to evaluate the suitability of pregnant women as a sentinel population for SARS-CoV-2 serosurveillance. MethodsUnselected consecutive pregnant women presenting at the labor ward of a single large hospital between July 20(th) 2020 to February 21(st) 2021 were enrolled and tested for SARS-CoV-2 serology using two assays: the rapid chromatic Wondfo One Step (for total IgA and IgG detection) and Roche Elecsys assay (detecting anti-nucleoprotein [N] IgG). SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence was computed as smooth spline function over time with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Risk factors were evaluated for positivity by each assay. We compared timepoint seroprevalence by the two assays with four concomitant community household surveys (HHS), in which the Roche assay was used, to determine the sensitivity and relevance of the pregnant women population as sentinel population. ResultsOverall SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence was 28.9% (221/763) by Roche and 17.9% (137/763) by Wondfo. Reported symptoms experienced during pregnancy were all significantly correlated with being SARS-CoV-2 seropositive at delivery with any assay (with odds-ratios ranging from 3.0 [95% CI: 2.1-4.3] for coryza to 22.8 [95% CI: 12.3-46.6] for ageusia). Seropositivity by either assay was high in women at delivery in the early period of the pandemic (June 2020), compared with seropositivity in women from the concomitant HHS: 44.1% (95% CI: 21.8-66.4) for Roche, 54.1% (30.9-78.5) for Wondfo, versus 11.4% (95% CI: 9.2-13.6) for HHS. For later periods (October 2020 and January 2021), the seropositivity in women at delivery measured by Roche corresponded well with the prevalence found among women in the HHS using the same assay, whilst prevalence measured by Wondfo dropped. ConclusionsWomen at delivery represent a highly exposed and readily accessible population for sentinel surveillance of emerging infections such as SARS-CoV-2.