TATIANA CARDOSO DE MELLO TUCUNDUVA
Índice h a partir de 2011
4
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto de Radiologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
LIM/24 - Laboratório de Oncologia Experimental, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
LIM/24 - Laboratório de Oncologia Experimental, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
7 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 7 de 7
conferenceObject Evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening in mammograms of young women.(2020) PETRINI, Daniel Gustavo Pellacani; VALENTE, Gabriel Vansuita; SHIMIZU, Carlos; ROELA, Rosimeire Aparecida; ARAUJO, Gabriel Miranda de; TUCUNDUVA, Tatiana Cardoso de Mello; FOLGUEIRA, Maria A. A. Koike; KIM, Hae YongbookPart Mama(2019) HSIEH, Su Jin Kim; ENDO, Érica; ZANETTA, Vitor Chiarini; BARROS, Nestor de; SHIMIZU, Carlos; BRESCIANI, Barbara H.; CASTRO, Flavio Spinola; COSTENARO, Marco Antonio; TUCUNDUVA, Tatiana Cardoso de Mello; FERREIRA, Vera C. C. S.- Effects of preoperative magnetic resonance image on survival rates and surgical planning in breast cancer conservative surgery: randomized controlled trial (BREAST-MRI trial)(2023) MOTA, Bruna Salani; REIS, Yedda Nunes; BARROS, Nestor de; CARDOSO, Natalia Pereira; MOTA, Rosa Maria Salani; SHIMIZU, Carlos; TUCUNDUVA, Tatiana Cardoso de Mello; FERREIRA, Vera Christina Camargo de Siqueira; GONCALVES, Rodrigo; DORIA, Maira Teixeira; RICCI, Marcos Desiderio; TRINCONI, Angela Francisca; CAMARGO, Cristina Pires; RIERA, Rachel; BARACAT, Edmund Chada; JR, Jose Maria Soares; FILASSI, Jose RobertoBackgroundBreast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has high sensitivity in detecting invasive neoplasms. Controversy remains about its impact on the preoperative staging of breast cancer surgery. This study evaluated survival and surgical outcomes of preoperative MRI in conservative breast cancer surgery.MethodsA phase III, randomized, open-label, single-center trial including female breast cancer participants, stage 0-III disease, and eligible for breast-conserving surgery. We compared the role of including MRI in preoperative evaluation versus radiologic exam routine with mammography and ultrasound in breast cancer conservative candidates. The primary outcome was local relapse-free survival (LRFS), and secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), mastectomy rate, and reoperation rate.Results524 were randomized to preoperative MRI group (n = 257) or control group (n = 267). The survival analysis showed a 5.9-years LRFS of 99.2% in MRI group versus 98.9% in control group (HR = 0.72; 95% CI 0.12-4.28; p = 0.7) and an OS of 95.3% in the MRI group versus 96.3% in the control group (HR = 1.37 95% CI 0.59-3.19; p = 0.8). Surgical management changed in 21 ipsilateral breasts in the MRI group; 21 (8.3%) had mastectomies versus one in the control group. No difference was found in reoperation rates, 22 (8.7%) in the MRI group versus 23 (8.7%) in the control group (RR = 1.002; 95% CI 0.57-1.75; p = 0.85).ConclusionPreoperative MRI increased the mastectomy rates by 8%. The use of preoperative MRI did not influence local relapse-free survival, overall survival, or reoperation rates.
- Deep learning algorithm performance in mammography screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis.(2021) ROELA, Rosimeire Aparecida; VALENTE, Gabriel Vansuita; SHIMIZU, Carlos; LOPEZ, Rossana Veronica Mendoza; TUCUNDUVA, Tatiana Cardoso de Mello; FOLGUEIRA, Guilherme Koike; KATAYAMA, Maria Lucia Hirata; PETRINI, Daniel Gustavo Pellacani; NOVAES, Guilherme Apolinario Silva; SERIO, Pedro Adolpho de Menezes Pacheco; MARTA, Guilherme Nader; SAMESHIMA, Koichi; KIM, Hae Yong; FOLGUEIRA, Maria A. A. Koike
bookPart Tipos de procedimentos percutâneos(2022) TUCUNDUVA, Tatiana Cardoso de Mello- Tattoo pigment mimicking calcifications in axillary lymph nodes: A pitfall in mammographic imaging evaluation(2020) AGUILLAR, Vera Lucia Nunes; TUCUNDUVA, Tatiana Cardoso de Mello; CARVALHO, Filomena Marino; MAZUCATO, Mariana Bertassi; VIANA, Marcela Pacheco; TORRES, Ulysses S.; MELLO, Giselle Guedes Netto de
- MRI as a complementary tool for the assessment of suspicious mammographic calcifications: Does it have a role?(2021) NINNO, Andrea Alves Maciel Di; MELLO, Giselle Guedes Netto de; TORRES, Ulysses S.; SHIMIZU, Carlos; TUCUNDUVA, Tatiana Cardoso de Mello; REIS, Fatima Regina Silva; ANANIAS, Mariana Pinheiro Ferri; LEDERMAN, Henrique ManoelIntroduction: Mammography remains the standard imaging modality for the identification and characterization of breast calcifications. However, its low specificity results in high biopsy rates in cases of suspicious calcifications. Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of MRI as an additional tool in the assessment of suspicious mammographic calcifications and to identify the enhancement patterns most related to malignancy. Methods: An observational, prospective, cross-sectional, bi-centre study was conducted including consecutive patients with suspicious calcification groups on mammography (BI-RADS? 4 and 5). Anatomopathological results obtained from biopsies were considered the reference standard, and the patients were followed up for at least two years. MRI examinations were interpreted by two radiologists in consensus. The chi-square test was used to evaluate the correlation between MRI features and histological results. The overall diagnostic performance of MRI for malignancy was calculated. Results: 162 female patients were included (mean age, 53 years; range 34?82 years), with 163 mammographic lesions, of which 77 (47.2%) were benign, 64 (39.3%) malignant, and 22 (13.5%) precursor lesions on histopathology. Malignant lesions demonstrated a significantly higher presence of enhancement (56/64; 87.5%) than benign lesions (17/77; 22.1%) (p < 0.001). Non-mass enhancement (NME) was the morphology most related to malignant lesions (38/56; 67.9%). The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of MRI for malignancy were 81.5%, 87.5%, 77.8%, 71.8%, and 90.5%, respectively. Conclusion: MRI performed as an adjunct tool allows to increase imaging specificity for malignancy in suspicious calcifications, which may contribute to reduce the need for biopsy.