LIVEA CARLA FIDALGO GARCEZ SANT'ANA

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
2
Lattes
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
LIM/27 - Laboratório de Neurociências, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina

Filtros

Limpar filtros

Configurações

Assunto: eye-tracking ×

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
  • article 1 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Diagnostic Performance of an Eye-Tracking Assisted Visual Inference Language Test in the Assessment of Cognitive Decline due to Alzheimer's Disease
    (2023) BELAN, Ariella Fornachari Ribeiro; PAIS, Marcos Vasconcelos; CAMARGO, Marina von Zuben de Arruda; ANA, Livea Carla Fidalgo Garcez Sant'; RADANOVIC, Marcia; FORLENZA, Orestes Vicente
    Background: The assessment of language changes associated with visual search impairment can be an important diagnostic tool in the Alzheimer's disease (AD) continuum. Objective: Investigate the performance of an eye-tracking assisted visual inference language task in differentiating subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or AD dementia from cognitively unimpaired older adults (controls). Methods: We assessed a group of 95 older adults (49 MCI, 18 mild dementia due to AD, and 28 controls). The subjects performed the same task under multiple experimental conditions which generate correlated responses that need to be taken into account. Thus, we performed a non-parametric repeated measures ANOVA model for verbal answers, and a linear mixed model (LMM) or its generalized version for the analysis of eye tracking variables. Results: Significant differences were found in verbal answers across all diagnostic groups independently of type of inference, i.e., logic or pragmatic. Also, eye-tracking parameters were able to discriminate AD from MCI and controls. AD patients did more visits to challenge stimulus (Control-AD, -0.622, SE = 0.190, p = 0.004; MCI-AD, -0.514, SE = 0.173, p = 0.011), more visits to the correct response stimulus (Control-AD, -1.363, SE = 0.383, p = 0.002; MCI-AD, -0.946, SE = 0.349, p = 0.022), more fixations on distractors (Control-AD, -4.580, SE = 1.172, p = 0.001; MCI-AD, -2.940, SE = 1.070, p = 0.020), and a longer time to first fixation on the correct response stimulus (Control-AD, -0.622, SE = 0.190, p = 0.004; MCI-AD, -0.514, SE = 0.173, p = 0.011). Conclusion: The analysis of oculomotor behavior along with language assessment protocols may increase the sensitivity for detection of subtle deficits in the MCI-AD continuum, representing an important diagnostic tool.
  • article 2 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Impact of Cognitive Demand on Eye Movement Pattern in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease
    (2022) CAMARGO, Marina von Zuben de Arruda; PAIS, Marcos Vasconcelos; BELLAN, Ariella Fornachari Ribeiro; TAHIRA, Ana Carolina; SANTOS, Bernardo dos; SANT'ANA, Livea Carla Fidalgo Garcez; RADANOVIC, Marcia; FORLENZA, Orestes Vicente
    Background: Eye-movement behavior has been used as a reliable tool to identify cognitive and behavioral patterns in individuals with different neuropsychiatric disorders including Alzheimer's disease (AD). Most studies in the field have been dedicated to evaluating eye-movement behavior during cognitive tasks in different protocols using multiple parameters. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the differences of eye-movement behavior in healthy subjects, subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and those with AD in a simple color task with and without cognitive demand. Methods: 91 subjects: 18 AD, 47 MCI, and 26 healthy controls had their oculomotor parameters assessed during baseline (no cognitive demand involved) and during a simple computational color memory task using an eye-tracker. Results: Baseline showed statistically different and heterogeneous results between normal cognition and MCI groups. Familiarization phase of the task could not discriminate between groups in any of the analyzed parameters. AD subjects made longer fixations and visits on distractors, and more frequent fixations and visits on the target areas than other groups during the response phase. Conclusion: Eye-tracking time-related parameters differentiate AD subjects from other groups under cognitive demand even in a simple color memory task.