MARIA LUIZA BAGGIO GARCIA PINTO

Índice h a partir de 2011
13
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
LIM/24 - Laboratório de Oncologia Experimental, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
  • article 8 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Oral HPV prevalence assessment by Linear Array vs. SPF10 PCR-DEIA-LiPA(25) system in the HPV Infection in Men (HIM) study
    (2020) BETTAMPADI, Deepti; SIRAK, Bradley A.; FULP, William J.; ABRAHAMSEN, Martha; VILLA, Luisa L.; LAZCANO-PONCE, Eduardo; SALMERON, Jorge; ISAACS-SORIANO, Kimberly A.; BAGGIO, Maria L.; TRENADO, Manuel Quiterio; GIULIANO, Anna R.
    Introduction: Oral human papillomavirus (HPV) attributable oropharyngeal cancers are on the rise in many countries. Oral HPV infections among healthy individuals are commonly detected using oral gargle samples. However, the optimal method for HPV genotyping oral gargle specimens in research studies has not been previously evaluated. Materials and methods: Oral gargle samples from 1455 HPV Infection in Men (HIM) study participants were HPV genotyped using two different methods: Linear Array and the SPF10 PCR-DEIA-LiPA(25). The sensitivity of the two tests for detecting individual HPV types and grouped HPV types, high-risk HPV, low-risk HPV, grouped 4-HPV-vaccine types, and grouped 9-HPV-vaccine-types, and the degree of concordance between the two tests was assessed. We also examined whether socio-demographic-behavioral factors were associated with concordance between the two assays. Results: The sensitivity of SPF10 PCR-DEIA-LiPA(25) was higher than Linear Array, with the exception of HPV 70, for the detection of oral HPV. The prevalence ratio of SPF10 PCR-DEIA-LiPA(25) to Linear Array varied between 1.0 and 9.0 for individual HPV genotypes, excluding HPV 70, and between 3.8 and 4.4 for grouped 4-valent and 9-valent HPV vaccine types, respectively. There was no association between socio-demographic-behavioral factors and discordance in results between the two tests for oral HPV 16 detection. Discussion: SPF10 PCR-DEIA-LiPA(25) was more sensitive than Linear Array for detecting HPV in oral gargle samples. Given the growing importance of detecting oral HPV infection for research studies of oral HPV natural history and vaccine effectiveness evaluation, we recommend using methods with higher sensitivity such as SPF10 PCR-DEIA-LiPA(25) for detecting HPV in oral gargle samples.
  • article 48 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Seroconversion following anal and genital HPV infection in men: The HIM study
    (2015) GIULIANO, Anna R.; VISCIDI, Raphael; TORRES, B. Nelson; INGLES, Donna J.; SUDENGA, Staci L.; VILLA, Luisa L.; BAGGIO, Maria Luiza; ABRAHAMSEN, Martha; QUITERIO, Manuel; SALMERON, Jorge; LAZCANO-PONCE, Eduardo
    Background: Protection from naturally acquired human papillomavirus (HPV) antibodies may influence HPV infection across the lifespan. This study describes seroconversion rates following genital, anal, and oral HPV 6/11/16/18 infections in men and examines differences by HPV type and anatomic site. Methods: Men with HPV 6/11/16/18 infections who were seronegative for those genotypes at the time of DNA detection were selected from the HPV Infection in Men (HIM) Study. Sera specimens collected <= 36 months after detection were analyzed for HPV 6/11/16/18 antibodies using a virus-like particle-based ELISA. Time to seroconversion was separately assessed for each anatomic site, stratified by HPV type. Results: Seroconversion to >= 1 HPV type (6/11/16/18) in this sub-cohort (N=384) varied by anatomic site, with 6.3%, 18.9%, and 0.0% seroconverting following anal, genital, and oral HPV infection, respectively. Regardless of anatomic site, seroconversion was highest for HPV 6 (19.3%). Overall, seroconversion was highest following anal HPV 6 infection (69.2%). HPV persistence was the only factor found to influence seroconversion. Conclusions: Low seroconversion rates following HPV infection leave men susceptible to recurrent infections that can progress to HPV-related cancers. This emphasizes the need for HPV vaccination in men to ensure immune protection against new HPV infections and subsequent disease. (C) 2015 The Authors.