GIULIANO BETONI GUGLIELMETTI

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
10
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
LIM/55 - Laboratório de Urologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
  • article 7 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Effectiveness of Intrarectal Povidone-iodine Cleansing Plus Formalin Disinfection of the Needle Tip in Decreasing Infectious Complications After Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    (2022) PONTES-JUNIOR, Jose; FREIRE, Tiago Magalhaes; PUGLIESI, Felipe Guimaraes; COSTA, Felipe Machado de Moura; SOUZA, Vinicius Meneguette Gomes De; GALUCCI, Fabio Pescarmona; ALBERTINI, Aline; COUTO, Adriano Borba; MURTA, Claudio Bovolenta; GUGLIELMETTI, Giuliano Betoni; NAHAS, William C.; JUNIOR, Adalberto Andriolo; NETO, Alcides Mosconi; CLARO, Joaquim Francisco de Almeida
    Purpose:Prostate biopsy is mostly performed through the transrectal route worldwide and infectious complications may occur in up to 7% of cases. Therefore, alternative strategies to decrease infectious complications are needed. Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of intrarectal povidone-iodine cleansing plus formalin disinfection of the needle tip in decreasing infectious complications after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.Materials and Methods:We conducted a prospective, single-center, phase III trial in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy randomized 1:1 to rectal mucosa cleansing with gauze soaked in 10% povidone-iodine solution wrapped around the gloved index finger and needle tip disinfection by immersion in a 10% formalin solution before each puncture vs control group. The primary end point was the rate of infectious complications defined as 1 or more of the following events: fever, urinary tract infection, or sepsis.Results:Overall, 633 patients were randomized to the intervention group and 623 to the control group. The infectious complication rate was 3.9% in the intervention group and 6.4% in the control group (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.36-0.99; P = .049). The rates of sepsis, urinary tract infection, and fever were 0.3% vs 0.5% (P = .646), 2.3% vs 4.1% (P = .071), and 1.3% vs 1.9% (P = .443), respectively. The positive urine culture rate was 5.2% in the intervention group and 9% in the control group (RR 0.57; P = .015). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding the occurrence of noninfectious adverse events.Conclusions:Intrarectal povidone-iodine cleansing plus formalin disinfection of the biopsy needle tip was associated with a reduction in infectious complications after transrectal prostate biopsy.