LUIS ALBERTO OLIVEIRA DALLAN
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Departamento de Cardio-Pneumologia, Faculdade de Medicina - Docente
Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
LIM/11 - Laboratório de Cirurgia Cardiovascular e Fisiopatologia da Circulação, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Líder
Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
LIM/11 - Laboratório de Cirurgia Cardiovascular e Fisiopatologia da Circulação, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Líder
11 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 10 de 11
- EuroSCORE II and the importance of a local model, InsCor and the future SP-SCORE(2014) LISBOA, Luiz Augusto Ferreira; MEJIA, Omar Asdrubal Vilca; MOREIRA, Luiz Felipe Pinho; DALLAN, Luis Alberto Oliveira; POMERANTZEFF, Pablo Maria Alberto; DALLAN, Luis Roberto Palma; MASSOTI, Maria Raquel B.; JATENE, Fabio B.Introduction: The most widely used model for predicting mortality in cardiac surgery was recently remodeled, but the doubts regarding its methodology and development have been reported. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the EuroSCORE II to predict mortality in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafts or valve surgery at our institution. Methods: One thousand consecutive patients operated on coronary artery bypass grafts or valve surgery, between October 2008 and July 2009, were analyzed. The outcome of interest was in-hospital mortality. Calibration was performed by correlation between observed and expected mortality by Hosmer Lemeshow. Discrimination was calculated by the area under the ROC curve. The performance of the EuroSCORE II was compared with the EuroSCORE and InsCor (local model). Results: In calibration, the Hosmer Lemeshow test was inappropriate for the EuroSCORE II (P=0.0003) and good for the EuroSCORE (P=0.593) and InsCor (P=0.184). However, the discrimination, the area under the ROC curve for EuroSCORE II was 0.81 [95% CI (0.76 to 0.85), P<0.001], for the EuroSCORE was 0.81 [95% CI (0.77 to 0.86), P<0.001] and for InsCor was 0.79 [95% CI (0.74-0.83), P<0.001] showing up properly for all. Conclusion: The EuroSCORE II became more complex and resemblance to the international literature poorly calibrated to predict mortality in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafts or valve surgery at our institution. These data emphasize the importance of the local model.
- Effect of a Perioperative Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in High-Risk Cardiac Surgery Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial(2018) FERREIRA, Graziela Santos Rocha; ALMEIDA, Juliano Pinheiro de; LANDONI, Giovanni; VINCENT, Jean Louis; FOMINSKIY, Evgeny; GALAS, Filomena Regina Barbosa Gomes; GAIOTTO, Fabio A.; DALLAN, Luis Oliveira; FRANCO, Rafael Alves; LISBOA, Luiz Augusto; DALLAN, Luis Roberto Palma; FUKUSHIMA, Julia Tizue; RIZK, Stephanie Itala; PARK, Clarice Lee; STRABELLI, Tania Mara; LAGE, Silvia Helena Gelas; CAMARA, Ligia; ZEFERINO, Suely; JARDIM, Jaquelline; ARITA, Elisandra Cristina Trevisan Calvo; RIBEIRO, Juliana Caldas; AYUB-FERREIRA, Silvia Moreira; AULER JR., Jose Otavio Costa; KALIL FILHO, Roberto; JATENE, Fabio Biscegli; HAJJAR, Ludhmila AbrahaoObjectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of perioperative intra-aortic balloon pump use in high-risk cardiac surgery patients. Design: A single-center randomized controlled trial and a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Setting: Heart Institute of SAo Paulo University. Patients: High-risk patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery. Intervention: Patients were randomized to receive preskin incision intra-aortic balloon pump insertion after anesthesia induction versus no intra-aortic balloon pump use. Measurements and Main Results: The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of 30-day mortality and major morbidity (cardiogenic shock, stroke, acute renal failure, mediastinitis, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and a need for reoperation). A total of 181 patients (mean [sd] age 65.4 [9.4] yr; 32% female) were randomized. The primary outcome was observed in 43 patients (47.8%) in the intra-aortic balloon pump group and 42 patients (46.2%) in the control group (p = 0.46). The median duration of inotrope use (51hr [interquartile range, 32-94 hr] vs 39hr [interquartile range, 25-66 hr]; p = 0.007) and the ICU length of stay (5 d [interquartile range, 3-8 d] vs 4 d [interquartile range, 3-6 d]; p = 0.035) were longer in the intra-aortic balloon pump group than in the control group. A meta-analysis of 11 randomized controlled trials confirmed a lack of survival improvement in high-risk cardiac surgery patients with perioperative intra-aortic balloon pump use. Conclusions: In high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery, the perioperative use of an intra-aortic balloon pump did not reduce the occurrence of a composite outcome of 30-day mortality and major complications compared with usual care alone.
- Current Impact of Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Sao Paulo State(2020) BORGOMONI, Gabrielle Barbosa; MEJIA, Omar Asdrubal Vilca; ORLANDI, Bianca Maria Maglia; GONCHAROV, Maxim; LISBOA, Luiz Augusto Ferreira; CONTE, Pedro Henrique; OLIVEIRA, Marco Antonio Praca; FIORELLI, Alfredo Inacio; JUNIOR, Orlando Petrucci; TIVERON, Marcos Grandim; DALLAN, Luis Alberto de Oliveira; JATENE, Fabio BiscegliBackground: Previous results on the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) have generated difficulties in choosing the best treatment for each patient undergoing myocardial revascularization surgery (CABG) in the current context. Objective: Evaluate the current impact of CPB in CABG in Sao Paulo State. Methods: A total of 2905 patients who underwent CABG were consecutively analyzed in 11 Sao Paulo State centers belonging to the Sao Paulo Registry of Cardiovascular Surgery (REPLICCAR) I. Perioperative and follow-up data were included online by trained specialists in each hospital. Associations of the perioperative variables with the type of procedure and with the outcomes were analyzed. The study outcomes were morbidity and operative mortality. The expected mortality was calculated using EuroSCORE II (ESII). The values of p <5% were considered significant. Results: There were no significant differences concerning the patients' age between the groups (p=0.081). 72.9% of the patients were males. Of the patients, 542 underwent surgery without CPB (18.7%). Of the preoperative characteristics, patients with previous myocardial infarction (p=0.005) and ventricular dysfunction (p=0.031) underwent surgery with CPB. However, emergency or New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV patients underwent surgery without CPB (p<0.001). The ESII value was similar in both groups (p=0.427). In CABG without CPB, the radial graft was preferred (p<0.001), and in CABG with CPB the right mammary artery was the preferred one (p<0.001). In the postoperative period, CPB use was associated with reoperation for bleeding (p=0.012). Conclusion: Currently in the REPLICCAR, reoperation for bleeding was the only outcome associated with the use of CPB in CABG.
- On-pump or off-pump? Impact of risk scores in coronary artery bypass surgery(2012) MEJIA, Omar Asdrubal Vilca; LISBOA, Luiz Augusto Ferreira; PUIG, Luiz Boro; MOREIRA, Luiz Felipe Pinho; DALLAN, Luis Alberto Oliveira; JATENE, Fabio BiscegliObjective: Remain controversies about the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the 2000 Bernstein Parsonnet (2000BP) and EuroSCORE (EU) for choice CPB in CABG. Methods: 1551 consecutive patients underwent CABG. CPB was used in 1,121 (72.3%) patients. The performance of 2000BP and EU was assessed by calibration, discrimination and correlation tests. For both risk scores, increasing the value of the score and presence of CPB were directly related to a higher risk of death (P < 0.05). Therefore with these two variables was constructed a logistic regression model for each risk score, in order to determine in which value of score the presence of CPB increases significantly the risk of death. Results: The calibration, like the area under the ROC curve for the group with CPB [2000BP=0.80; EU=0.78] and without CPB [2000BP=0.81; EU=0.85] were appropriate. The Spearman correlation for groups with and without CPB was 0.66 (P < 0.001) and 0.62 (P < 0.001), respectively. Using the 2000BP, for a value >17.75 the presence of CPB increased the chance of death to 7.4 [CI 95% (4.4-12.3), P < 0.0001]. With the EU, for a value >4.5 the presence of CPB increased the chance of death to 5.4 [CI 95% (3.3-9), P < 0.0001]. Conclusion: In decision making, the 2000BP>17.75 or the EU>4.5 guide to identify patients who underwent CABG with CPB increases significantly the chance of death.
- The arrival of COVID-19 in Brazil and the impact on coronary artery bypass surgery(2021) MEJIA, Omar A. V.; BORGOMONI, Gabrielle B.; SILVEIRA, Lucas M. V.; GUERREIRO, Gustavo P.; FALCAO FILHO, Alexandre. T. G.; GONCHAROV, Maxim; DALLAN, Luis R. P.; OLIVEIRA, Marco A. P.; SOUSA, Alexandre G. de; NAKAZONE, Marcelo A.; TIVERON, Marcos G.; CAMPAGNUCCI, Valquiria P.; SILVA, Pedro G. M.; DALLAN, Luis A. O.; LISBOA, Luiz A. F.; JATENE, Fabio B.Background and Aim of the Study This study analyzed the arrival of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Brazil and its impact on coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. Methods Patients undergoing isolated CABG in six hospitals in Brazil were divided into two periods: pre-COVID-19 (March-May 2019, N = 468) and COVID-19 era (March-May 2020, N = 182). Perioperative data were included on a dedicated REDCap platform. Patients with clinical and tomographic criteria and/or PCR (+) for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection were considered COVID-19 (+). Logistic regression analysis was performed to create a multiple predictive model for mortality after CABG in COVID-19 era. Results Compared to 2019, in 2020, CABG surgeries had a 2.8-fold increased mortality risk (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1-7.6, p = .041), patients who evolved with COVID-19 had a 11-fold increased mortality risk (95% CI: 2.2-54.9, p < .003), rates of morbidities and readmission to the intensive care unit. The surgical volume was decreased by 60%. The model to predict mortality after CABG in the COVID-19 era was validated with good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow = 1.43) and discrimination (receiver operating characteristic = 0.78). Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic had an adverse impact on mortality, morbidity and volume of patients undergoing CABG.
- R Cardiac Surgery Costs According to the Preoperative Risk in the Brazilian Public Health System(2015) TITINGER, David Provenzale; LISBOA, Luiz Augusto Ferreira; MATRANGOLO, Bruna La Regina; DALLAN, Luis Roberto Palma; DALLAN, Luis Alberto Oliveira; TRINDADE, Evelinda Marramon; ECKL, Ivone; KALIL FILHO, Roberto; MEJIA, Omar Asdrubal Vilca; JATENE, Fabio BiscegliBackground: Heart surgery has developed with increasing patient complexity. Objective: To assess the use of resources and real costs stratified by risk factors of patients submitted to surgical cardiac procedures and to compare them with the values reimbursed by the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS). Method: All cardiac surgery procedures performed between January and July 2013 in a tertiary referral center were analyzed. Demographic and clinical data allowed the calculation of the value reimbursed by the Brazilian SUS. Patients were stratified as low, intermediate and high-risk categories according to the EuroSCORE. Clinical outcomes, use of resources and costs (real costs versus SUS) were compared between established risk groups. Results: Postoperative mortality rates of low, intermediate and high-risk EuroSCORE risk strata showed a significant linear positive correlation (EuroSCORE: 3.8%, 10%, and 25%; p < 0.0001),as well as occurrence of any postoperative complication (EuroSCORE: 13.7%, 20.7%, and 30.8%, respectively; p = 0.006). Accordingly, length-of-stay increased from 20.9 days to 24.8 and 29.2 days (p < 0.001). The real cost was parallel to increased resource use according to EuroSCORE risk strata (R$ 27.116,00 +/- R$ 13.928,00 versus R$ 34.854,00 +/- R$ 27.814,00 versus R$ 43.234,00 +/- R$ 26.009,00, respectively; p < 0.001). SUS reimbursement also increased (R$ 14.306,00 +/- R$ 4.571,00 versus R$ 16.217,00 +/- R$ 7.298,00 versus R$ 19.548,00 +/- R$935,00; p < 0.001). However, as the EuroSCORE increased, there was significant difference (p < 0.0001) between the real cost increasing slope and the SUS reimbursement elevation per EuroSCORE risk strata. Conclusion: Higher EuroSCORE was related to higher postoperative mortality, complications, length of stay, and costs. Although SUS reimbursement increased according to risk, it was not proportional to real costs.
- InsCor: um método simples e acurado para avaliação do risco em cirurgia cardíaca(2013) MEJA, Omar A. V.; LISBOA, Luiz A. F.; PUIG, Luiz B.; MOREIRA, Luiz Felipe P.; DALLAN, Luis A. O.; POMERANTZEFF, Pablo M. A.; JATENE, Fabio B.; STOLF, Noedir A. G.Background: Risk scores show difficulties to attain the same performance in different populations. Objective: To create a simple and accurate risk assessment model for patients submitted to surgery due to coronary and/or valvular disease at Instituto do Coracao da Universidade de Sao Paulo (InCor-HCFMUSP). Methods: Between 2007 and 2009, 3,000 patients were submitted to surgical procedure due to coronary artery and/or valvular disease at InCor-HCFMUSP. From this record, data of 2/3 of the patients were used for model development (bootstrap technique), and 1/3 for internal validation of the model. The performance of the model (InsCor) was compared to the 2000 Bernstein-Parsonnet (2000BP) and EuroSCORE (ES) complexes. Results: Only 10 variables were selected: age > 70 years, female sex; coronary revascularization + valve, myocardial infarction < 90 days; reoperation; surgical treatment of aortic valve; surgical treatment of tricuspid valve; creatinine < 2mg/dL; ejection fraction < 30%, and events. The Hosmer Lemeshow test for the InsCor was 0.184, indicating excellent calibration. The area under the ROC curve was 0.79 for the InsCor, 0.81 for the ES and 0.82 for 2000BP, confirming that the models are good and have similar discrimination. Conclusions: The InsCor and ES performed better than 2000BP at all stages of validation, but the new model, in addition to showing identification with the local risk factors, is simpler and more objective for mortality prediction in patients undergoing surgery due to coronary and/or valvular disease at InCor-HCFMUSP (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2013;100(3):246-254).
- Analysis of > 100,000 Cardiovascular Surgeries Performed at the Heart Institute and a New Era of Outcomes(2020) V, Omar A. Mejia; LISBOA, Luiz Augusto Ferreira; CANEO, Luiz Fernando; ARITA, Elisandra Trevisan; BRANDAO, Carlos Manuel de Almeida; DIAS, Ricardo Ribeiro; COSTA, Roberto; JATENE, Marcelo Biscegli; POMERANTZEFF, Pablo Maria Alberto; DALLAN, Luis Alberto Oliveira; JATENE, Fabio BiscegliBackground: The current challenge of cardiovascular surgery (CVS) is to improve the outcomes in increasingly severe patients. In this respect, continuous quality improvement (CQI) programs have had an impact on outcomes. Objective: To assess the evolution of the incidence and mortality due to CVS, as well as the current outcomes of the Hospital das Clinicas Heart Institute of the University of Sao Paulo Medical School (InCor-HCFMUSP). Methods: An outcome analysis of CVSs performed at the InCor, between January 1984 and June 2019. We observed the surgical volume and mortality rates in 5 time periods: 1st (1984-1989), 2nd (1990-1999), 3rd (2000-2007), 4th (2008-2015) and 5th (2016-2019). The CQI program was implemented between 2015 and 2016. The analysis included the total number of surgeries and the evolution of the most frequent procedures. Results: A total of 105,599 CCVs were performed, with an annual mean of 2,964 procedures and mortality of 5,63%. When comparing the 4th and the 5th periods, the average global volume of surgeries was increased from 2,943 to 3,139 (p = 0.368), bypass graft (CABG), from 638 to 597 (p = 0.214), heart valve surgery, from 372 to 465 (p = 0.201), and congenital heart disease surgery, from 530 to 615 (p = 0.125). The average global mortality went from 7.8% to 5% (p < 0.0001); in CABG surgery, from 5.8% to 3.1% (p < 0.0001); in heart valve surgery, from 14% to 7.5% (p < 0.0001) and in congenital heart disease surgery, from 12.1% to 9.6% (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: In spite of a recent trend towards increased surgical volume, there was a significant decrease in operative mortality in the groups studied. After the implementation of the CQI program, the mortality rates were closer to international standards.
- Intervenção Coronariana Percutânea Prévia como Fator de Risco para Revascularização Miocárdica(2012) LISBOA, Luiz Augusto Ferreira; MEJIA, Omar Asdrubal Vilca; DALLAN, Luis Alberto Oliveira; MOREIRA, Luiz Felipe Pinho; PUIG, Luiz Boro; JATENE, Fabio Biscegli; STOLF, Noedir Antonio GroppoBackground: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has increased as the initial revascularization strategy in chronic coronary artery disease. Consequently, more patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) have history of coronary stent. Objective: Evaluate the impact of previous PCI on in-hospital mortality after CABG in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. Methods: Between May/2007 and June/2009, 1099 consecutive patients underwent CABG on cardiopulmonary bypass. Patients with no PCI (n=938, 85.3%) were compared with patients with previous PCI (n=161, 14.6%). Logistic regression models and propensity score matching analysis were used to assess the risk-adjusted impact of previous PCI on in-hospital mortality. Results: Both groups were similar, except for the fact that patients with previous PCI were more likely to have unstable angina (16.1% x 9.9%, p=0.019). In-hospital mortality after CABG was higher in patients with previous PCI (9.3% x 5.1%, p=0.034) and it was comparable with EuroSCORE and 2000 Bernstein-Parsonnet risk score. Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, previous PCI emerged as an independent predictor of postoperative in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 1.94, 95% CI 1.02-3.68, p=0.044) as strong as diabetes (odds ratio 1.86, 95% CI 1.07-3.24, p=0.028). After computed propensity score matching based on preoperative risk factors, in-hospital mortality remained higher among patients with previous PCI (odds ratio 3.46, 95% CI 1.10-10.93, p=0.034). Conclusions: Previous PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease is an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality after CABG. This fact must be considered when PCI is indicated as initial alternative in patients with more severe coronary artery disease. (Arq Bras Cardiol 2012;99(1):586-595)
- Validação do 2000 Bernstein-Parsonnet e EuroSCORE no Instituto do Coração - USP(2012) MEJIA, Omar Asdrubal Vilca; LISBOA, Luiz Augusto Ferreira; DALLAN, Luis Alberto Oliveira; POMERANTZEFF, Pablo Maria Alberto; MOREIRA, Luiz Felipe Pinho; JATENE, Fabio Biscegli; STOLF, Noedir Antonio GroppoObjective: To validate the 2000 Bernstein Parsonnet (2000BP) and additive EuroSCORE (ES) to predict mortality in patients who underwent coronary bypass surgery and/or heart valve surgery at the Heart Institute, University of Sao Paulo (InCor/HC-FMUSP). Methods:A prospective observational design. We analyzed 3000 consecutive patients who underwent coronary bypass surgery and/or heart valve surgery, between May 2007 and July 2009 at the InCor/HC-FMUSP. Mortality was calculated with the 2000BP and ES models. The correlation between estimated mortality and observed mortality was validated by calibration and discrimination tests. Results: There were significant differences in the prevalence of risk factors between the study population, 2000BP and ES. Patients were stratified into five groups for 2000BP and three for the ES. In the validation of models, the ES showed good calibration (P = 0396), however, the 2000BP (P = 0.047) proved inadequate. In discrimination, the area under the ROC curve proved to be good for models, ES (0.79) and 2000BP (0.80). Conclusion: In the validation, 2000BP proved questionable and ES appropriate to predict mortality in patients who underwent coronary bypass surgery and/or heart valve surgery at the InCor/HC-FMUSP.