ANTONIO CARLOS SAMAIA DA SILVA COELHO

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
2
Lattes
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais

Filtros

Limpar filtros

Configurações

Indexador: Scopus × Assunto: Clinical Neurology ×

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
  • article 1 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Prospective Analysis of Cerebral Edema Admission and Clinical Outcome in Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysm
    (2023) OBERMAN, Dan Zimelewicz; RABELO, Nicollas Nunes; PIPEK, Leonardo Zumerkorn; TELLES, Joao Paulo Mota; BARBAT, Natalia Camargo; COELHO, Antonio Carlos Samaia da S. I. L. V. A.; YOSHIKAWA, Marcia Harumy; BARBOSA, Guilherme Bittencourt; TEIXEIRA, Manoel Jacobsen; FIGUEIREDO, Eberval Gadelha
    AIM: To evaluate the association between global cerebral edema (GCE) after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and its impact on functional outcome evaluated by the modified Rankin scale (mRS). MATERIAL and METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study with patients who were admitted to the hospital due to SAH. During the period from January 2018 to November 2019, 107 patients with intracranial aneurysms were enrolled. Using univariate and multivariate analysis, we sought to identify predictors and evaluated the impact of GCE on outcome after 6 months using the mRS. RESULTS: GCE was present in 54 (50.5%) patients, of which 27 (25.2%) were mild, 20 (18.7%) moderate and 7 (6.5%) were severe. Univariate analysis identified high Hunt-Hess and Glasgow coma scale on clinical admission as predictors factors of GCE (p<0.05), and higher modified Fisher scale as a radiological predictor of Glasgow coma scale (p<0.05). Thirty-three (30.8%) patients were deceased at 6 months. Death or severe disability were predicted by higher age, poor clinical scale on admission and severe GCE (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: GCE on admission is independently associated with poor clinical outcomes at discharge, and six months after SAH. Given its strong association with poor clinical grade on admission, GCE should be considered a straightforward and radiological important marker of early brain injury, with ominous implications.
  • article 2 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Global Outcomes for Microsurgical Clipping of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Benchmark Analysis of 2245 Cases
    (2024) DREXLER, Richard; SAUVIGNY, Thomas; PANTEL, Tobias F.; RICKLEFS, Franz L.; CATAPANO, Joshua S.; WANEBO, John E.; LAWTON, Michael T.; SANCHIN, Aminaa; HECHT, Nils; VAJKOCZY, Peter; RAYGOR, Kunal; TONETTI, Daniel; ABLA, Adib; NAAMANI, Kareem El; TJOUMAKARIS, Stavropoula I.; JABBOUR, Pascal; JANKOWITZ, Brian T.; SALEM, Mohamed M.; BURKHARDT, Jan-Karl; WAGNER, Arthur; WOSTRACK, Maria; GEMPT, Jens; MEYER, Bernhard; GAUB, Michael; MASCITELLI, Justin R.; DODIER, Philippe; BAVINZSKI, Gerhard; ROESSLER, Karl; STROH, Nico; GMEINER, Matthias; GRUBER, Andreas; FIGUEIREDO, Eberval G.; COELHO, Antonio Carlos Samaia da Silva; BERVITSKIY, Anatoliy V.; ANISIMOV, Egor D.; RZAEV, Jamil A.; KRENZLIN, Harald; KERIC, Naureen; RINGEL, Florian; PARK, Dougho; KIM, Mun-Chul; MARCATI, Eleonora; CENZATO, Marco; WESTPHAL, Manfred; DUEHRSEN, Lasse
    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Benchmarks represent the best possible outcome and help to improve outcomes for surgical procedures. However, global thresholds mirroring an optimal and reachable outcome for microsurgical clipping of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) are not available. This study aimed to define standardized outcome benchmarks in patients who underwent clipping of UIA. METHODS: A total of 2245 microsurgically treated UIA from 15 centers were analyzed. Patients were categorized into low- (""benchmark"") and high-risk (""nonbenchmark"") patients based on known factors affecting outcome. The benchmark was defined as the 75th percentile of all centers' median scores for a given outcome. Benchmark outcomes included intraoperative (eg, duration of surgery, blood transfusion), postoperative (eg, reoperation, neurological status), and aneurysm-related factors (eg, aneurysm occlusion). Benchmark cutoffs for aneurysms of the anterior communicating/anterior cerebral artery, middle cerebral artery, and posterior communicating artery were determined separately. RESULTS: Of the 2245 cases, 852 (37.9%) patients formed the benchmark cohort. Most operations were performed for middle cerebral artery aneurysms (53.6%), followed by anterior communicating and anterior cerebral artery aneurysms (25.2%). Based on the results of the benchmark cohort, the following benchmark cutoffs were established: favorable neurological outcome (modified Rankin scale <= 2) >= 95.9%, postoperative complication rate <= 20.7%, length of postoperative stay <= 7.7 days, asymptomatic stroke <= 3.6%, surgical site infection <= 2.7%, cerebral vasospasm <= 2.5%, new motor deficit <= 5.9%, aneurysm closure rate >= 97.1%, and at 1-year follow-up: aneurysm closure rate >= 98.0%. At 24 months, benchmark patients had a better score on the modified Rankin scale than nonbenchmark patients. CONCLUSION: This study presents internationally applicable benchmarks for clinically relevant outcomes after microsurgical clipping of UIA. These benchmark cutoffs can serve as reference values for other centers, patient registries, and for comparing the benefit of other interventions or novel surgical techniques.