DANIEL TAVARES DE REZENDE

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
3
Lattes
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais

Filtros

Limpar filtros

Configurações

Autor e Coautores FMUSP-HC Normalizados: WANDERLEY MARQUES BERNARDO ×

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 4 de 4
  • conferenceObject
    COMPARATION BETWEEN DIFFERENT METHODS OF SURVEILLANCE OF DYSPLASTIC LESIONS IN PATIENTS WIHT ULCERATIVE COLITIS AND CROHN'S DISEASE: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS
    (2019) RESENDE, Ricardo H.; BERNARDO, Wanderlei M.; MARCO, Michele O. De; REZENDE, Daniel T.; MOTA, Raquel Cristina L.; BRUNALDI, Vitor O.; FURUYA, Carlos K.; ISHIDA, Robson K.; KUGA, Rogerio; MOURA, Eduardo G. de
  • conferenceObject
    THE ROLE OF THE ENDOSCOPIC BALLOON DILATION OF THE MAJOR PAPILLA IN MANAGING COMMON BILE DUCT STONES: A COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    (2019) MATSUBAYASHI, Carolina O.; BERNARDO, Wanderlei M.; MARCO, Michele O. De; RESENDE, Ricardo H.; REZENDE, Daniel T.; MOTA, Raquel Cristina L.; BRUNALDI, Vitor O.; LUZ, Gustavo O.; FRANZINI, Tomazo; MOURA, Eduardo G. de
  • article
    Use of hemostatic powder in treatment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    (2019) REZENDE, Daniel Tavares de; BRUNALDI, Vitor Ottoboni; BERNARDO, Wanderley Marques; RIBEIRO, Igor Braga; MOTA, Raquel Cristina Lins; BARACAT, Felipe Iankelevich; MOURA, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de; BARACAT, Renato; MATUGUMA, Sergio Eiji; MOURA, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux de
    Background and study aims TC-325 is a novel mineral hemostatic powder that creates a mechanical barrier by absorbing blood components and promoting clotting. Recently approved for use in humans, it has shown promise for treatment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). However, because there have been no large studies of TC-325, its true efficacy and safety profile remain unknown. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the safety and efficacy of TC-325 in treating UGIB, based on rates of initial hemostasis, rebleeding, and adverse events (AEs). Methods We searched the MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Latin-American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature databases, as well as the gray literature, to identify articles describing use of TC-325 up to October 2018.Primary outcomes were initial hemostasis and rebleeding. AEs were described as a secondary outcome. Risk of bias was assessed with international scores. Results We identified 2077 records after removal of duplicates. We included 50 studies, involving a collective total of 1445 patients, in the quantitative synthesis. Primary hemostasis and rebleeding rates were 90.7% and 26.1%, respectively. Subgroup analyses showed similar results. Only eight AEs were reported. Conclusions TC-325 appears to be a safe, effective treatment for UGIB. The overall rate of initial hemostasis after TC-325 use is high, regardless of etiology of bleeding or whether TC-325 is used as a primary or rescue therapy. Although it is also associated with high rebleeding rates, rates of AEs and equipment failure after TC-325 use are extremely low.
  • article 8 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Adverse events after biliary sphincterotomy: Does the electric current mode make a difference? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    (2020) FUNARI, Mateus Pereira; RIBEIRO, Igor Braga; MOURA, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de; BERNARDO, Wanderley Marques; BRUNALDI, Vitor Ottoboni; REZENDE, Daniel Tavares; RESENDE, Ricardo Hannum; MARCO, Michele Oliveira de; FRANZINI, Tomazo Antonio Prince; MOURA, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux de
    Background: Biliary sphincterotomy is an invasive method that allows access to the bile ducts, however, this procedure is not exempt of complications. Studies in the literature indicate that the mode of electric current used for sphincterotomy may carry different incidences of adverse events such as pancreatitis, hemorrhage, perforation, and cholangitis. Aim: To evaluate the safety of different modes of electrical current during biliary sphincterotomy based on incidence of adverse events. Methods: We searched articles for this systematic review in Medline, EMBASE, Central Cochrane, Lilacs, and gray literature from inception to September 2019. Data from studies describing different types of electric current were meta-analyzed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The following electric current modalities were evaluated: endocut, blend, pure cut, pure cut followed by blend, monopolar, and bipolar. Results: A total of 1791 patients from 11 randomized clinical trials evaluating the following comparisons: 1. Endocut vs Blend: No statistical difference in the incidence of bleeding (7% vs 13.4%; RD: -0.11 [-0.31, 0.08], P=0.27, I-2=86%), pancreatitis (4.4% vs 3.5%; RD: 0.01 [-0.03, 0.04], P=0.62, I-2=48%) and perforation (absence of cases in both arms). 2. Endocut vs Pure cut: Higher incidence of mild bleeding (without drop in hemoglobin levels, clinical repercussion or need for endoscopic intervention) in the pure cut group (9.2% vs 28.8%; RD: -0.19 [-0.27, -0.12], P<0.00001, I-2=0%). No statistical difference regarding pancreatitis (5.2% vs 0.9%; RD: 0.05 [-0.01, 0.11], P=0.12, I-2=57%), perforation (0.4% vs 0%; RD: 0.00 [-0.01, 0.02], P=0.7, I-2=0%) or cholangitis (1.8% vs 3.2%; RD: -0.01 [-0.09, 0.06], P=0,7). 3. Pure cut vs blend: higher incidence of mild bleeding in the pure cut group (40.4% vs 16.7%; RD: 0.24 [0.15, 0.33], P<0.00001, I-2=0%). No statistical difference concerning incidence of pancreatitis or cholangitis. 4. Pure cut vs Pure cut followed by Blend: No statistical difference regarding incidence of bleeding (22.5% vs 11.7%; RD: -0.10 [-0.24, 0.04], P=0.18, I-2=61%) and pancreatitis (8.9% vs 14.8%; RD 0.06 [-0.02, 0.13], P=0.12, I-2=0%). 5. Blend vs pure cut followed by blend: no statistical difference regarding incidence of bleeding and pancreatitis (11.3% vs 10.4%; RD -0.01 [-0.11, 0.09], P=0.82, I-2=0%). 6. Monopolar vs bipolar: higher incidence of pancreatitis in the monopolar mode group (12% vs 0%; RD 0.12 [0.02, 0.22], P=0.01). Conclusion: Pure cut carries higher incidences of mild bleeding compared to endocut and blend. However, this modality might present a lower incidence of pancreatitis. The monopolar mode elicits higher rates of pancreatitis in comparison with the bipolar mode. There is no difference in incidence of cholangitis or perforation between different types of electric current. There is a lack of evidence in the literature to recommend one method over the others, therefore new studies are warranted. As there is no perfect electric current mode, the choice in clinical practice must be based on the patient risk factors.