RACHEL SIMOES PIMENTA RIECHELMANN
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
LIM/24 - Laboratório de Oncologia Experimental, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
13 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 10 de 13
- Pregabalin for the Prevention of Oxaliplatin-Induced Painful Neuropathy: A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial(2017) ANDRADE, Daniel Ciampi De; TEIXEIRA, Manoel Jacobsen; GALHARDONI, Ricardo; FERREIRA, Karine S. L.; MILENO, Paula Braz; SCISCI, Nathalia; ZANDONAI, Alexandra; TEIXEIRA, William G. J.; SARAGIOTTO, Daniel F.; SILVA, Valquiria; RAICHER, Irina; CURY, Rubens Gisbert; MACARENCO, Ricardo; HEISE, Carlos Otto; BROTTO, Mario Wilson Iervolino; MELLO, Alberto Andrade De; MEGALE, Marcelo Zini; DOURADO, Luiz Henrique Curti; BAHIA, Luciana Mendes; RODRIGUES, Antonia Lilian; PARRAVANO, Daniella; FUKUSHIMA, Julia Tizue; LEFAUCHEUR, Jean-Pascal; BOUHASSIRA, Didier; SOBROZA, Evandro; RIECHELMANN, Rachel P.; HOFF, Paulo M.; SILVA, Fernanda Valerio Da; CHILE, Thais; DALE, Camila S.; NEBULONI, Daniela; SENNA, Luiz; BRENTANI, Helena; PAGANO, Rosana L.; SOUZA, Angela M. DeBackground. Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) receiving oxaliplatin (OXA) develop acute and chronic painful oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OXAIPN). Acute and chronic OXA-related neuropathies have different pathophysiological bases, but both lead to a common phenomenon: central sensitization (CS) of nociceptive neuronal networks, leading to increased sensitivity (hyperlgesia, allodynia) in the somatosensory system, the common ground of chronic neuropathic pain. Because CS is related to increased risk of painful OXAIPN, we hypothesized that preemptive use of the anti-hyperalgesic drug pregabaline (known to decrease CS) during OXA infusions would decrease the incidence of chronic OXAIPN. Methods. Pain-free, chemotherapy-naive CRC patients receiving at least one cycle of modified-FLOX [5-FU(500 mg/m(2)) 1 leucovorin(20 mg/m(2))/week for] 6 weeks+oxaliplatin(85 mg/m2) at weeks 1-3-5 every 8 weeks] were randomized (1:1) into the study. Patients received either pregabalin or placebo for 3 days before and 3 days after each OXA infusion and were followed for up to 6 months. Clinical assessments were performed at baseline, at the end of chemotherapy, and after the follow-up period. The main outcome was average pain at the last visit assessed by the visual analogic scale (0-10) item of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Secondary endpoints were presence of neuropathic pain according to the Douleur Neuropathique-4 (DN-4), pain dimensions (short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire [MPQ]), Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI), and changes in nerve conduction studies (NCS) and side effect profile. Results. One hundred ninety-nine patients (57.0 +/- 10.7 years old, 98 female, 101 male) were randomized. Data from 56 patients were not included in the analyses (as they did not receive at least one full cycle of modified FLOX). Data from 78 patients in the pregabalin group and 65 patients in the placebo group were retained for analyses. At the last visit, pain intensity in the pregabalin group was 1.03 (95% confidence interval [CI] 50.79-1.26), and 0.85 (95% CI50.64-1.06) in the placebo group, which did not reach significance. Scores from the BPI, MPQ, DN-4, NPSI, and NCS and side-effect profiles and incidence of death did not differ between groups. Quality of life (QoL) score did not differ between groups (placebo = 576.9 +/- 23.1, pregabalin group 79.4 +/- 20.6). Mood scores were not significantly different between groups (placebo 9.7 [8.1-11.2]; pregabalin 6.8 [5.6-8.0]). Conclusion. The preemptive use of pregabalin during OXA infusions was safe, but did not decrease the incidence of chronic pain related to OXAIPN.
- Adherence to colonoscopy recommendations for first-degree relatives of young patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer(2015) GARCIA, Guilherme H.; RIECHELMANN, Rachel P.; HOFF, Paulo M.OBJECTIVES: Colorectal cancer is the third leading cause of cancer death in the United States. The American College of Gastroenterology recommends screening for first-degree relatives of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer before the age of 50. A colonoscopy is one of the most commonly recommended exams due to its specificity and the possibility to resect pre-malignant lesions. Nevertheless, the rate of physician adherence to this recommendation is unknown. METHODS: This transversal study was performed at a major cancer center in Brazil with 62 patients, aged 18 to 50, who completed a questionnaire on information received from their physicians regarding screening their first-degree relatives. We used the answers from patients who provided explicit consent. RESULTS: Two hundred and three patients were eligible to participate and 93 (45.8%) agreed to complete the questionnaire. Twenty-three questionnaires (24.73%) were returned and 39 were completed by telephone. Of the patients who answered the questionnaire, 39 (62.9%) had received a colonoscopy recommendation for their first-degree relatives and 23 (37.1%) were not informed of the recommendation. Among the patients who received the recommendations, 20.51% affirmed that all relatives completed the exam and 51.28% stated that no relatives completed the exam. DISCUSSION: The adherence rate of our physicians to the ACG guideline recommendations was 62.9%. Considering that our study was performed at a leading center for cancer treatment in Latin America, we had expected better adherence. The results show that adherence to the colorectal cancer screening recommendations for high-risk patients must be improved.
- Regorafenib in Patients with Antiangiogenic-Naive and Chemotherapy-Refractory Advanced Colorectal Cancer: Results from a Phase IIb Trial(2019) RIECHELMANN, Rachel P.; LEITE, Luiz S.; BARIANI, Giovanni M.; GLASBERG, Joao; RIVELLI, Thomas G.; FONSECA, Leonardo Gomes da; NEBULONI, Daniela R.; I, Maria Braghiroli; QUEIROZ, Marcelo A.; ISEJIMA, Alice M.; KAPPELER, Christian; KIKUCHI, Luciana; HOFF, Paulo M.Background Regorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor with antiangiogenic effects that improves overall survival (OS) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) after failure of standard therapies. We investigated the efficacy and safety of regorafenib in antiangiogenic therapy-naive chemotherapy-refractory advanced colorectal cancer. Patients and Methods This single-center, single-arm, phase IIb study (NCT02465502) enrolled adults with mCRC whose disease had progressed on, or who were intolerant to, standard therapy, but who were antiangiogenic therapy-naive. Patients received regorafenib 160 mg once daily for 3 weeks per 4-week cycle. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) rate at week 8. Results Of 59 treated patients, almost half had received at least four prior lines of therapy. Patients received a median of 86% of the planned dose. The week 8 PFS rate was 53% (95% confidence interval [CI], 39.1-64.3); median PFS was 3.5 months (95% CI, 1.8-3.6). Median OS was 7.4 months (95% CI, 5.3-8.9). Tumor response (RECIST version 1.1) was 2%, and metabolic response rate (criteria from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer) was 41%. The most frequently reported regorafenib-related grade >= 3 adverse events were hypertension (36%), hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR, 25%), and hypophosphatemia (24%). There were no regorafenib-related deaths. An exploratory analysis showed that patients with grade >= 2 HFSR had longer OS (10.2 months) with regorafenib treatment versus those with grades 0-1 (5.4 months). Conclusion These findings support the antitumor activity of regorafenib in antiangiogenic-naive patients with chemotherapy-refractory mCRC. Implications for Practice The multikinase inhibitor regorafenib improved overall survival in the phase III CORRECT and CONCUR trials in heavily pretreated patients with treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Exploratory subgroup analysis from CONCUR suggested that regorafenib treatment prior to targeted therapy (including bevacizumab) may improve outcomes. In this single-center, single-arm phase IIb study, regorafenib demonstrated antitumor activity in 59 antiangiogenic-naive patients with chemotherapy-refractory mCRC. Further studies should assess the efficacy of regorafenib in this patient population, as well as explore the reasons behind improved outcomes among patients who had a metabolic response and those who developed hand-foot skin reaction.
- Phase 2 Trial of Metformin Combined With 5-Fluorouracil in Patients With Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer(2016) MIRANDA, Vanessa C.; BRAGHIROLI, Maria Ignez; FARIA, Luiza Dib; BARIANI, Giovanni; ALEX, Alexandra; BEZERRA NETO, Joao Evangelista; CAPARELI, Fernanda C.; SABBAGA, Jorge; SANTOS, Juliana Ferreira Lobo dos; HOFF, Paulo M.; RIECHELMANN, Rachel P.Effects of metformin in colorectal cancer have not been tested in clinical trials. In this phase 2 trial with 50 patients, metformin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) showed median progression-free survival of 2 months and overall survival of 7.9 months. However, among patients who experienced stable disease at 8 weeks, disease stabilization lasted for 5.6 months and patients survived for 16 months. Obese patients and those with longer periods off 5-FU seemed to derive more benefit. Background: Observational and preclinical studies have suggested that metformin has antitumor effects in solid tumors, including colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the effects of metformin in CRC have not been tested in clinical trials. Patients and Methods: This was a single-center, single-arm phase 2 clinical trial where histologically confirmed CRC patients with measurable and progressing metastatic disease previously treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and an antieepidermal growth factor receptor (if the tumor was RAS wild type) were enrolled to receive metformin 850 mg orally continuously 2 times a day plus 5-FU 425 mg/m(2) and leucovorin 50 mg intravenously weekly until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary end point was disease control rate at 8 weeks. Results: Among 50 patients included, 11 (22%) met the primary end point. The median progression-free survival was 1.8 months and the median overall survival 7.9 months. Analyzing only the 11 patients who experienced disease control at 8 weeks, their median progression-free survival was 5.6 months and their median overall survival was 16.2 months. There was a trend for prolonged median survival for obese patients (12.4 vs. 5.8 months) and those longer off 5-FU. The treatment was well tolerated; the main adverse effects were diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and myelotoxicity. Conclusion: Metformin and 5-FU showed an overall modest but intriguing activity in patients with refractory CRC in this phase 2 study. Some patients experienced long-term disease control. Further trials are needed to confirm these results, particularly in obese patients with CRC.
- Self-Reported Conflicts of Interest of Authors, Trial Sponsorship, and the Interpretation of Editorials and Related Phase III Trials in Oncology(2013) BARIANI, Giovanni M.; FERRARI, Anezka C. R. de Celis; HOFF, Paulo M.; KRZYZANOWSKA, Monika K.; RIECHELMANN, Rachel P.Purpose Growing participation by industry in cancer research has resulted in increased reporting of conflicts of interest (COI). We aimed to test any association between authors' conclusions and self-reported COI or trial sponsorship in cancer studies. Methods Editorials and related phase III trials published in six clinical oncology journals in the last 3.5 years were analyzed independently by two investigators who classified study conclusions according to authors' endorsement of the experimental therapy. Logistic regression multivariable models were used to assess predictors of favorable conclusions of editorialists and of phase III authors. Results From January 2008 to October 2011, 1,485 articles were retrieved: 150 phase III trials and 150 editorials were eligible. Among the phase III trials, 82 (54.7%) had positive results, and 78 (52.0%) were entirely or partially funded by industry. Any COI were disclosed in 103 phase III trials (68.7%) and in 71 editorials (47.3%). Multivariable analysis showed that phase III trial results were the only significant predictor for a positive conclusion by trial authors (odds ratio [OR], 92.2; 95% CI, 19.7 to 431.6; P < .001). Sponsorship did not predict for positive conclusion by phase III authors (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.3 to 2.5; P = .788). The only factor associated with positive conclusions by editorial authors was a positive conclusion by phase III trial authors (OR, 36.3; 95% CI, 6.8 to 194.2; P < .001). Conclusion The interpretation of recently published phase III cancer trials by their authors or by editorialists was not influenced by financial relationships or industry sponsorship. Increased awareness of COI policies may have led to more integrity in cancer research reporting. (C) 2013 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
- Living better or living longer? Perceptions of patients and health care professionals in oncology(2015) TOLOI, Diego de Araujo; CRITCHI, Gabriela; MANGABEIRA, Andrea; MATSUSHITA, Felipe; RIECHELMANN, Rachel P.; HOFF, Paulo M.; SAAD, Everardo D.Background: Cancer can influence the views of patients on treatment goals and make them different from those of health care professionals (HCPs). It is crucial to understand patient expectations regarding cancer treatment. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional survey of patients with cancer and HCPs to evaluate their perceptions about treatment priorities and to analyse variables that might influence their opinions. To identify treatment choices, we interviewed all participants using a structured questionnaire with fictitious case vignettes. Results: We enrolled a total of 230 participants, including 144 patients and 86 HCPs (35 nurses, 21 physicians, 30 others). Treatment priority between survival time (28.5% for patients vs. 8.1% for HCP) and quality of life (45.8% vs. 87.2%) differed significantly, with the remaining participants stating they were uncertain or unwilling to respond, or providing invalid responses (P < 0.01). In logistic regression, prioritising survival time was more frequent in patients, adjusting for age and gender (odds ratio (OR) = 3.95; P < 0.01). The view that the physician alone should be responsible for treatment choices was more frequent among patients than HCPs (18.8 vs. 5.8%; P = 0.01). Conclusions: In Brazil, our results suggest that survival time is more important for patients with cancer than for HCPs, whereas quality of life is more important for HCPs than for patients with cancer, who place great emphasis on physicians as decision-makers. Given that Brazilian patients often rely on physicians for decisions, the potential impact of different priorities between survival time and quality of life when patients and HCPs are compared is unknown.
- Response to Chemotherapy and Prognosis in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer With DNA Deficient Mismatch Repair(2017) ALEX, Alexandra Khichfy; SIQUEIRA, Sheila; COUDRY, Renata; SANTOS, Juliana; ALVES, Michel; HOFF, Paulo M.; RIECHELMANN, Rachel P.This study suggests that the DNA deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) phenotype is predictive of resistance to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients with dMMR had numerically lower response rate compared with patients with proficient MMR (11.7% vs. 28.6%; P = .088). Furthermore, dMMR was associated with BRAF mutations and was factor of poor prognostic, particularly in sporadic versus Lynch-related tumors. Background: DNA deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) genes are associated with microsatellite instability and good prognosis in early-stage colorectal cancer (CRC). However dMMR is rare in metastatic CRC (mCRC) and little is known about its influence on treatment response rate (RR). The primary objective of this study was to compare the RR of patients with mCRC according to dMMR status. Methods: This was a retrospective study that compared the RR by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors 1.1 criteria in patients with mCRC treated with chemotherapy according to dMMR status. All digital images were retrieved for RR evaluation by a single radiologist blinded to dMMR results. dMMR was defined as loss of immunohistochemistry expression of at least 1 of the MMR genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, or PMS2). Cases were dMMR patients, and controls were proficient MMR (pMMR) patients (1: 2 fashion). Based on clinical and molecular features, dMMR patients were classified as probable Lynch or sporadic. Results: From January 2009 to January 2013, 762 out of 1270 patients were eligible and screened for dMMR: n = 27 (3.5%) had dMMR mCRC and n = 735 (96.5%) had pMMR mCRC. Given the rarity, 14 dMMR cases outside the inclusion period were included (total 41 dMMR cases) and 84 controls (pMMR). By intention-to-treat analysis, considering all patients who received at least 1 dose of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (N dMMR = 34), those with dMMR had lower RR compared with those with pMMR (RR, 11.7% vs. 28.6%; odds ratio, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-1.40; P = .088); patients with probable Lynch-related mCRC presented higher RR than subjects with probable sporadic dMMR (22.2% vs. 0%). dMMR was associated with BRAF mutations and poor prognosis, particularly in the sporadic subgroup (median survival, 29.8 vs. 5.9 months; P = .025). Conclusion: This study suggests that the dMMR phenotype is predictive of resistance to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Apparently, such resistance is more pronounced in the sporadic dMMR phenotype, suggesting biological heterogeneity within the dMMR mCRC subgroup.
- The Effects of Palliative Chemotherapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients With an ECOG Performance Status of 3 and 4(2015) TEIXEIRA, Marcela Crosara; MARQUES, Daniel Fernandes; FERRARI, Anezka Celis; ALVES, Michel Fabiano Silva; ALEX, Alexandra Khichfy; SABBAGA, Jorge; HOFF, Paulo M.; RIECHELMANN, Rachel P.There are no data supporting the effect of systemic chemotherapy on the survival of patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) score of 3 and 4. Among our ECOG PS 3/4 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), patients who received chemotherapy had a survival advantage compared with those given best supportive care (BSC) only. Background: Although chemotherapy is standard for patients with mCRC and ECOG PS of 0/1, the real benefit for patients with ECOG PS > 2 remains uncertain, because they are generally excluded from clinical trials. Our objectives were to compare the survival and safety of ECOG PS 3/4 patients who were administered chemotherapy with those who received BSC only. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive mCRC patients who started first-line chemotherapy at our institution in a 4-year period. A multivariable Cox regression model was used to adjust for prognostic factors and logistic regression, to identify predictive factors of Grade 3/4 toxicity. Results: From June 2008 to June 2012, 240 consecutive patients were included: 100 (41.7%) had an ECOG PS of 0/1, 75 (31.3%) ECOG PS of 2, and 65 (27%) ECOG PS of 3/4. Median survival for patients treated with chemotherapy was 18.4 months for patients with ECOG PS of 0/1, 10.8 months for those with ECOG PS of 2, and 6.8 months for patients with ECOG PS of 3/4. Among those with ECOG PS of 3/4, chemotherapy use led to a nonsignificant survival gain (median, 6.8 vs. 2.3 months for BSC; P = .13). Factors significantly associated with worse survival in an adjusted analysis were right-sided tumors (hazard ratio [HR], 2.97; P = .005) and ECOG PS status (ECOG PS 2 vs. 0/1; HR, 1.67; P = .025, and ECOG PS 3/4 vs. 0/1; HR, 2.67; P < .0001). The rate of Grade >= 3 toxicities during the first cycle did not differ significantly across ECOG groups; likely because 40% of ECOG PS 3/4 patients received upfront dose-reduced therapy. The rates of treatment-related hospitalization were similar across all ECOG groups. All deaths were disease-associated. Conclusion: Our retrospective study suggests that chemotherapy might benefit selected mCRC patients with poor PS. With up-front dose reduction and close monitoring for toxicity, the risk of serious adverse events is minimized.
- Replacing 5-fluorouracil by capecitabine in localised squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal: systematic review and meta-analysis(2016) SOUZA, Karla T.; PEREIRA, Allan A. L.; ARAUJO, Raphael L.; OLIVEIRA, Suilane Coelho Ribeiro; HOFF, Paulo M.; RIECHELMANN, Rachel P.Background: The standard treatment for localised squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCAC) is chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin. Because 5-FU and capecitabine have offered similar efficacy in many phase-III trials of solid tumours, studies have tested capecitabine in this setting of SCCAC. However, these studies are small and have reported variable results. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Methods: Medline, Scopus and Embase were searched for studies that evaluated the efficacy outcomes of capecitabine used as a substitute of 5-FU in the CRT of localised SCCAC. The primary endpoint was complete response rate (CRR) at 6 months. Metaprop analysis of reported CRR-based on pooled estimates of proportions with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated on the base of the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation. Results: We retrieved 300 studies, of which six met our eligibility criteria. The capecitabine dose ranged from 500 mg/m(2) to 825 mg/m(2) BID for 5 days per week during radiation. With a total of 218 patients, the median follow-up was 21.5 months (14-23). The pooled analysis of three trials (N = 132 patients) reported a CRR at 6 months of 88% (83%-94%), considering all clinical stages. The pooled analysis of overall CRR (N = 218 patients), evaluated at different intervals, showed an overall CRR of 91% (87%-95%). Rates of locoregional relapse varied from 3.2% to 21%. The majority of patients completed the planned radiotherapy dose (93.5%-100%) and any chemotherapy interruption was reported in up to 55.8% of patients. Conclusions: Capecitabine is an acceptable and more convenient alternative to infusional 5-FU in the CRT for localised SCCAC, offering similar clinical CRR to those reported by phase-III trials.
- Evaluation of F-18-FDG PET-CT as a prognostic marker in advanced biliary tract cancer(2018) BRAGHIROLI, Maria I.; MOTA, Jose M.; DUARTE, Paulo S.; MORITA, Tiago O.; BARIANI, Giovanni M.; NEBULONI, Daniela; BUCHPIGUEL, Carlos A.; HOFF, Paulo M.; RIECHELMANN, Rachel P.BackgroundAdvanced biliary tract cancers have a dismal prognosis. Treatment with gemcitabine plus cisplatin has resulted in a significant improvement in survival; however, early assessment of outcomes poses a challenge.ObjectiveWe carried out a prospective study to evaluate the prognostic role of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18-FDG) PET-CT scans in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.Patients and methodsPatients with advanced unresectable or metastatic biliary tract cancer starting first-line chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus cisplatin underwent F-18-FDG PET-CT studies at baseline and after two cycles of therapy. The total lesion glycolysis (TLG) measured at baseline as well as the variation in TLG between the two studies were analyzed as prognostic indicators of overall survival. The survival analyses were carried out using Kaplan-Meier curves and the comparison of survival curves was performed using the Breslow test.ResultsOf the 42 patients included, 37 had the first F-18-FDG PET-CT and 27 had the second F-18-FDG PET-CT. Patients with lower TLG values at baseline or after two cycles of therapy presented a higher median survival than patients with higher baseline TLG values. Patients with a higher decrease in the TLG values between the two studies also had a higher median survival time. However, these results only trended for statistical significance (P values ranging between 0.05 and 0.16).ConclusionLower baseline TLG measured by F-18-FDG PET-CT as well as a decrease in metabolic uptake after chemotherapy were associated with a trend toward longer median survival among patients with advanced biliary cancers.