EDUARDO SANTAMARIA CARVALHAL RIBAS

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
10
Lattes
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto Central, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
LIM/45 - Laboratório de Fisiopatologia Neurocirúrgica, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina

Filtros

Limpar filtros

Configurações

Autor e Coautores FMUSP-HC Normalizados: FERNANDO CAMPOS GOMES PINTO ×

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
  • article 57 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Role of Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy and Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: Preliminary Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial
    (2013) PINTO, Fernando Campos Gomes; SAAD, Felippe; OLIVEIRA, Matheus Fernandes de; PEREIRA, Renan Muralho; MIRANDA, Fernanda Letkaske de; TORNAI, Juliana Benevenuto; LOPES, Maria Izabel Romao; RIBAS, Eduardo Santamaria Carvalhal; VALINETTI, Emilia Aparecida; TEIXEIRA, Manoel Jacobsen
    BACKGROUND: Currently, the most common treatment for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) is a ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS), generally with programmable valve implantation. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) is another treatment option, and it does not require prosthesis implantation. OBJECTIVE: To compare the functional neurological outcome in patients after 12 months of treatment with INPH by using 2 different techniques: ETV or VPS. METHODS: Randomized, parallel, open-label trial involving the study of 42 patients with INPH and a positive response to the tap test, from January 2009 to January 2012. ETV was performed with a rigid endoscope with a 30 degrees lens (Minop, Aesculap), and VPS was performed with a fixed-pressure valve (PS Medical, Medtronic). The outcome was assessed 12 months after surgery. The neurological function outcomes were based on the results of 6 clinical scales: mini-mental, Berg balance, dynamic gait index, functional independence measure, timed up and go, and normal pressure hydrocephalus. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups after 12 months of follow-ups, and the VPS group showed better improvement results (ETV = 50%, VPS = 76.9%). CONCLUSION: Compared with ETV, VPS is a superior method because it had better functional neurological outcomes 12 months after surgery.
  • article 1 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Ventriculoatrial shunt catheter displacement by a central venous catheter: a rare complication
    (2014) RIBAS, E. Carvalhal; BEER-FURLAN, A.; PINTO, F. Campos