BRUNO ALVES RUDELLI

Índice h a partir de 2011
3
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina

Filtros

Limpar filtros

Configurações

Autor: GURGEL, Henrique de Melo Campos ×

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
  • article 0 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF OSSEOINTEGRATION OF UNCEMENTED TARGOS (R) STEMS. A 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP
    (2022) MIYAHARA, Helder de Souza; NARCISO, Jorge Henrique; CORREA, Jose Guilherme Lollo; VICENTE, Jose Ricardo Negreiros; EJNISMAN, Leandro; RUDELLI, Bruno Alves; GURGEL, Henrique de Melo Campos; CROCI, Alberto Tesconi
    Introduction: Total hip arthroplasty is a widespread treatment and is considered the gold standard in cases of hip osteoarthritis, with high rates of success in improving pain and function when well performed. After five years of follow-up, this study evaluates the osseointegration of uncemented Targos (R) collared stems in arthroplasties. Methods: Observational study of 182 total hip arthroplasties performed in 2014 with Targos (R) cementless collared femoral stems (Lepine). Bone quality was assessed according to the Dorr scale and osseointegration according to the Engh score. Results: The overall mean age was 56.5 years, consisting of 104 men (57.1%) and 103 women (56.6%). The os-seointegration rate of the stems (total Engh>0) was 100%. There was no statistical difference between groups concerning age (p=0.262), gender (p=0.463), primary diagnosis (p=0.585), af-fected side (p=0.459), and degree of Dorr (p=0.857). Conclusion: Targos (R) cementless collared femoral stems showed excellent osseointegration in all patients evaluated, regardless of age, gender, and preoperative bone quality. Moreover, spot welds observed on preoperative radiographs have the best association with implant osseointegration. Level of evidence IV, case series.
  • article 0 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Reproducibility of Digital Planning in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty Among Experienced and Novice Surgeons
    (2023) FABRICIO, Marcelo Zerbetto; RUDELLI, Bruno Alves; MIYAHARA, Helder de Souza; EJNISMAN, Leandro; GURGEL, Henrique de Melo Campos; CROCI, Alberto Tesconi
    Abstract Objective The present study aims to assess the reproducibility of digital planning for cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) among surgeons with different levels of experience. In addition, it attempts to determine the degree of planning reliability based on a contralateral THA or on a spherical marker positioned at the greater trochanter for calibration. Methods Two evaluators with different experience levels (A1 and A2) performed independently the retrospective digital surgical planning of 64 cementless THAs. Next, we compared the planning with the implants used in the surgery. The reproducibility was excellent when planning and implants were identical; proper in case of a single-unit variation; and inappropriate if there was variation in two or more units. The present analysis also determined the calibration accuracy between the contralateral THA and the spherical marker at the greater trochanter level. Results The present study demonstrated greater success when the most experienced evaluator performed the planning and greater accuracy for the contralateral THA. When splitting the analysis per parameter (contralateral THA or spherical marker), there was a statistical difference only for the planning of A1 and the implants used in the surgery. This difference occurred in the excellent category, with 67.3% for contralateral THA compared with 30.6% for a spherical marker (p < 0.001), and in the inappropriate category, with 7.1% for contralateral THA compared with 30.6% for a spherical marker (p < 0.001). Conclusions Digital planning is more accurate when performed by an experienced evaluator. The contralateral prosthesis head was a better reference than a marker on the greater trochanter.