LAILA SABINO GARRO

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
3
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 10 de 12
  • article 25 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Anaphylaxis to quinolones in mastocytosis: Hypothesis on the mechanism
    (2019) GIAVINA-BIANCHI, Pedro; GONCALVES, Danilo Gois; ZANANDREA, Andressa; CASTRO, Raisa Borges de; GARRO, Laila Sabino; KALIL, Jorge; CASTELLS, Mariana
  • article 3 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Drug-induced anaphylaxis in children: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and drug provocation test REPLY
    (2014) AUN, Marcelo Vivolo; BLANCA, Miguel; GARRO, Laila Sabino; RIBEIRO, Marisa Rosimeire; KALIL, Jorge; MOTTA, Antonio Abilio; CASTELLS, Mariana; GIAVINA-BIANCHI, Pedro
  • bookPart
    Reações a contrastes
    (2017) GARRO, Laila Sabino
  • bookPart
    Reações a contrastes
    (2015) GARRO, Laila Sabino
  • conferenceObject
    Midazolam is a major cause of intraoperative immediate hypersensitivity reactions
    (2018) D'ONOFRIO, Ana Carolina; BORALLI, Cristiane Fernandes; PORTILHO, Nathalia Coelho; GARRO, Laila Sabino; RIBEIRO, Marisa Rosimeire; MAGALHAES, Manoela Crespo De; CAMPOS, Lucila; MOTTA, Antonio Abilio; KALIL FILHO, Jorge Elias; GIAVINA-BIANCHI, Pedro; AUN, Marcelo V.
  • article 26 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Outcomes and safety of drug provocation tests
    (2011) AUN, Marcelo Vivolo; BISACCIONI, Carla; GARRO, Laila Sabino; RODRIGUES, Adriana Teixeira; TANNO, Luciana Kase; ENSINA, Luis Felipe Chiaverirti; KALIL, Jorge; MOTTA, Antonio Abilio; GIAVINA-BIANCHI, Pedro
    Drug provocation tests (DPTs) are considered the gold standard for identifying adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The aim of this study was to analyze DPT results and discuss severe systemic reactions associated with them. This was a retrospective analysis of 500 patients with ADRs who sought treatment and were submitted to DPTs when indicated between 2006 and 2010. We performed DPTs according to the European Network for Drug Allergy recommendations. Single-blind, placebo-controlled DPTs were performed with antibiotics, local anesthetics, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, as well as with other drugs. Patient characteristics, DPT results, and reactions were analyzed. The sample comprised 198 patients (80.8% of whom were female patients) submitted to 243 DPTs. Ages ranged from 9 to 84 years (mean, 39.9 years). The 243 DPTs were performed with local anesthetics (n = 93), antibiotics (n = 19), acetaminophen (n = 44), benzydamine (n = 33), COX-2 inhibitors (n = 26), dipyrone (n = 7), aspirin (n = 4), or other drugs (n = 17). The results of 4 tests (1.6%) were inconclusive, whereas those of 10 (4.1%) revealed positive reactions to antibiotics (2/19), COX-2 inhibitors (2/26), acetaminophen (3/44), and local anesthetics (3/93). Two severe reactions were observed: cephalexin-induced anaphylactic shock and bupivacaine-induced anaphylaxis without shock. Four patients (2.0%) reacted to the placebo before administration of the drug. Drug provocation tests are safe for use in clinical practice but they should be placebo-controlled and should be performed under the supervision of an allergist. To confirm a presumptive diagnosis and to manage allergies appropriately, it is crucial to perform DPTs. (Allergy Asthma Proc 32:301-306, 2011; doi: 10.2500/aap.2011.32.3450)
  • article 3 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Anafilaxia perioperatória: A experiência brasileira
    (2016) AUN, Marcelo Vivolo; GARRO, Laila Sabino; RIBEIRO, Marisa Rosimeire; MOTTA, Antônio Abílio; KALIL, Jorge; GIAVINA-BIANCHI, Pedro
    Perioperative anaphylaxis is a rare hypersensitivity reaction, but it has a rapid onset and is potentially fatal. The true incidence is not well known and varies in accordance with the country from 1:1 250 to 1:13 000 surgeries. It may occur through an allergic (IgE-mediated or not) or non-allergic mechanism, but it is believed that the IgE-mediated reactions are the most common and severe. Any product or drug used in the procedure has the potential to be the cause of a reaction, but neuromuscular blocking agents are the most frequently reported, followed by latex and antibiotics. In this mini-review we discuss some key points of the management of these patients and w present Brazilian data, which suggest that an active search for cases by working together with anesthesiologists could lead to an increase in diagnosis and, therefore, better prevention of future reactions
  • conferenceObject
    Incidence of Intraoperative Anaphylaxis in A University General Hospital in Brazil
    (2013) GARRO, Laila Sabino; CARMONA, Maria Jose Carvalho; SOARES, Iracy Silvia Correa; AUN, Marcelo Vivolo; RIBEIRO, Marisa Rosimeire; RODRIGUES, Adriana Teixeira; KALIL, Jorge; GIAVINA-BIANCHI, Pedro; MOTTA, Antonio Abilio
    RATIONALE: The epidemiology of intraoperative anaphylaxis is un-known in Brazil. We aimed to evaluate the incidence and clinical features of anaphylaxis during anesthesia in a University General Hospital in Sao Paulo, Brazil. METHODS: A cross-sectional, observational study analyzing data fromvoluntary notification sent by anesthesiologists, about occurrence of intraoperative anaphylaxis during the period between January and December 2010. The diagnostic criteria for anaphylaxis were based onthe World Allergy Organization Guidelines. We analyzed the incidence of intraoperative anaphylaxis, clinical features, severity of anaphylaxis, types of surgical procedures, classification of anesthetic risk (American Society of Anesthesiologists - ASA), culprit agent cited by the anesthesiologist and type of treatment provided. RESULTS: The incidence of intraoperative anaphylaxis was 69:10.000 surgeries. The mean age of patients with anaphylaxis was 36.7 years-old and 57% were women. The most common procedures associated with anaphylaxis were the abdominal non-vascular (17.1%) and urologic (17.1%) surgeries. Skin symptoms were the most prevalent (85.7%) and all patients who presented cardiovascular shock were classified as ASA II (42.9%) or ASA III (57.1%). Epinephrine was used preferentially in anaphylaxis grade 3 (72.7%), while a few patients with anaphylaxis grades 1 and 2 took the drug (2.1% and 16.7, respectively). The most commonly etiologic drugs cited by the anesthesiologists were the neuromuscular blocking agents (22.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Our incidence of intraoperative anaphylaxis was higher than in other studies reported in the literature. These data are a warning signal to encourage measures to reduce the incidence of these severe reactions.
  • bookPart
    Alergia ao Látex
    (2015) GARRO, Laila Sabino; GALVãO, Violeta Régnier; GIAVINA-BIANCHI, Pedro
  • article 103 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs are Major Causes of Drug-Induced Anaphylaxis
    (2014) AUN, Marcelo Vivolo; BLANCA, Miguel; GARRO, Laila Sabino; RIBEIRO, Marisa Rosimeire; KALIL, Jorge; MOTTA, Antonio Abilio; CASTELLS, Mariana; GIAVINA-BIANCHI, Pedro
    BACKGROUND: Drugs are responsible for 40% to 60% of anaphylactic reactions treated in the emergency department. A global research agenda to address uncertainties in anaphylaxis includes studies that identify factors associated with morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: The present study investigated drug-induced anaphylaxis, etiologies, aggravating factors, and treatment. METHODS: A total of 806 patients with adverse drug reactions were screened, and those who had a clinical diagnosis of anaphylaxis were included in the study. Clinical and demographic characteristics of anaphylaxis were described, including etiologies, pathophysiologic mechanisms involved in the reactions, and a personal history of atopy and asthma. Factors associated with disease severity also were identified. RESULTS: Anaphylaxis was diagnosed in 117 patients (14.5%). The etiologies were defined in 76% of the cases, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs being the most frequent. Seventy-eight patients (66.7%) reported a previous reaction to the drug involved in the current reaction or to a drug from the same class and/or group. Epinephrine was used to treat 34.2% of patients who presented with anaphylaxis, and 40.8% of those with anaphylactic reactions with cardiovascular involvement. IgE-mediated reactions were associated with greater severity, manifested by the rates of cardiovascular dysfunction, hospitalization, and use of epinephrine. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of anaphylaxis is high in patients who seek medical assistance for drug reactions, but its diagnosis is missed in emergency services, and adrenaline is underused. Drugs were prescribed to many patients despite a history of previous reaction. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were implicated in most cases of anaphylaxis induced by drugs, and IgE-mediated reactions were less frequent but more severe. (C) 2014 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology