ALINE GOMES BITTENCOURT

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
10
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
LIM/32 - Laboratório de Otorrinolaringologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 6 de 6
  • article 13 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Surdez pré-lingual: benefícios do implante coclear versus prótese auditiva convencional
    (2012) BITTENCOURT, Aline Gomes; TORRE, Ana Adelina Giantomassi Della; BENTO, Ricardo Ferreira; TSUJI, Robinson Koji; BRITO, Rubens de
    INTRODUCTION: The majority of patients with hearing loss, including those with severe hearing loss, benefits from the use of hearing aids. The cochlear implant is believed to achieve better results in a child with hearing loss in cases where the severity of disability renders hearing aids incapable of providing adequate sound information, as they require sufficient cochlear reserve so that acoustic detention occurs. OBJECTIVE: To assess if cochlear implants provide more benefit than conventional hearing aids in prelingually deaf patients. SUMMARY OF THE FINDINGS : The study was a systematic review of scientific papers selected by a search of the SciELO, Cochrane, MEDLINE, and LILACS-BIREME databases. Among the 2169 articles found, 12 studies proved relevant to the issue and presented an evidence strength rating of B. No publications rated evidence strength A. Seven of the studies analyzed were prospective cohorts and 5 were cross-sectional studies. CONCLUSION: Based on several studies, cochlear implants were demonstrated to be the best current alternative for bilateral severe or profound hearing loss, achieving better results in speech perception and development in prelingual children when compared to conventional hearing aids.
  • article 1 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Cochleovestibular nerve involvement in multifocal fibrosclerosis
    (2012) TSUJI, R. K.; BITTENCOURT, A. G.; ARAI, M. H.; GEBRIM, E. M. Santiago
    Objectives: To report a case of multifocal fibrosclerosis with a nine-year follow up, and to discuss this disease's radiological appearance and management. The disease is a rare systemic disorder of unknown cause characterised by fibrous proliferation involving multiple anatomical sites. Case report: A 50-year-old woman presented with histological findings characterised by similar inflammatory processes involving the meninges, pituitary gland, peritoneum, retroperitoneum and orbits, prompting a search for a common pathophysiology. A diagnosis of multifocal fibrosclerosis was postulated. Symptom improvement was noted after treatment with prednisone and azathioprine. Conclusion: This is the first documented case of involvement of the cochleovestibular nerve in a patient with multifocal fibrosclerosis. The rare association between fibrotic diseases and masses showing various clinical patterns should be kept in mind by otolaryngologists, and imaging performed to investigate for multifocal fibrosclerosis. However, diagnosis can only be confirmed with tissue biopsy and histopathological examination.
  • article 15 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Cochlear Implantation Via the Middle Fossa Approach: Surgical and Programming Considerations
    (2012) BENTO, Ricardo Ferreira; BITTENCOURT, Aline Gomes; GOFFI-GOMEZ, Maria Valeria Schmidt; SAMUEL, Paola; TSUJI, Robinson Koji; BRITO, Rubens de
    Objectives: To report the results of cochlear implantation via the middle fossa approach in 4 patients, discuss the complications, and present a detailed description of the programming specifications in these cases. Study Design: Retrospective case review. Setting: Tertiary-care referral center with a well-established cochlear implant program. Patients: Four patients with bilateral canal wall down mastoid cavities who underwent the middle fossa approach for cochlear implantation. Interventions: Cochlear implantation and subsequent rehabilitation. A middle fossa approach with cochleostomy was successfully performed on the most superficial part of the apical turn in 4 patients. A Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system was used in 3 patients and a MED-EL Sonata Medium device in 1 patient. The single electrode array was inserted through a cochleostomy from the cochlear apex and occupied the apical, middle, and basal turns. Telemetry and intraoperative impedance recordings were performed at the end of surgery. A CT scan of the temporal bones was performed to document electrode insertion for all of the patients. Main Outcome Measures: Complications, hearing thresholds, and speech perception outcomes were evaluated. Results: Neural response telemetry showed present responses in all but 1 patient, who demonstrated facial nerve stimulation during the test. Open-set speech perception varied from 30% to 100%, despite the frequency allocation order of the MAP. Conclusion: Cochlear implantation via the middle cranial fossa is a safe approach, although it is a challenging procedure, even for experienced surgeons.
  • article 0 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Radiology Quiz Case 2 - Diagnosis: Middle ear hemangioma
    (2012) BITTENCOURT, Aline Gomes; BRITO, Rubens de; BENTO, Ricardo Ferreira; TOYAMA, Carlos
  • article 5 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Programming peculiarities in two cochlear implant users with superficial siderosis of the central nervous system
    (2012) BITTENCOURT, Aline Gomes; GOFFI-GOMEZ, Maria Valeria Schmidt; PINNA, Mariana Hausen; BENTO, Ricardo Ferreira; BRITO, Rubens de; TSUJI, Robinson Koji
    To report the audiological outcomes of cochlear implantation in two patients with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss secondary to superficial siderosis of the CNS and discuss some programming peculiarities that were found in these cases. Retrospective review. Data concerning clinical presentation, diagnosis and audiological assessment pre- and post-implantation were collected of two patients with superficial siderosis of the CNS. Both patients showed good hearing thresholds but variable speech perception outcomes. One patient did not achieve open-set speech recognition, but the other achieved 70% speech recognition in quiet. Electrical compound action potentials could not be elicited in either patient. Map parameters showed the need for increased charge. Electrode impedances showed high longitudinal variability. The implants were fairly beneficial in restoring hearing and improving communication abilities although many reprogramming sessions have been required. The hurdle in programming was the need of frequent adjustments due to the physiologic variations in electrical discharges and neural conduction, besides the changes in the impedances. Patients diagnosed with superficial siderosis may achieve limited results in speech perception scores due to both cochlear and retrocochlear reasons. Careful counseling about the results must be given to the patients and their families before the cochlear implantation indication.
  • article 14 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Post-lingual deafness: benefits of cochlear implants vs. conventional hearing aids
    (2012) BITTENCOURT, Aline Gomes; IKARI, Liliane Satomi; TORRE, Ana Adelina Giantomassi Della; BENTO, Ricardo Ferreira; TSUJI, Robinson Koji; BRITO NETO, Rubens Vuono de
    The technological advances in cochlear implants and processing strategies have enabled subjects affected by severe to profound hearing loss to hear sounds and recognize speech in various different degrees. The variability of hearing outcomes in subjects with post-lingual deafness has been significant and cochlear implant indications have been extended to include an ever larger population. Objective: This paper aims to look into the groups of post-lingual deafness patients to find where cochlear implants have yielded better outcomes than conventional hearing aids. Materials and Methods: Review the literature available on databases SciELO, Cochrane, MEDLINE, and LILACS-BIREME. The publications selected for review were rated as A or B on evidence strength on the day of the review. Their authors analyzed and compared hearing aids and cochlear implants in populations of post-lingually deaf patients. Study Design: Systematic review. Results: Eleven out of the 2,169 papers searched were found to be pertinent to the topic and were rated B for evidence strength. Six studies were prospective cohort trials, four were cross-sectional studies and one was a clinical trial. Conclusion: The assessment done on the benefits yielded by post-lingually deaf subjects from cochlear implants showed that they are effective and provide for better results than conventional hearing aids.