ALINE GOMES BITTENCOURT
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
LIM/32 - Laboratório de Otorrinolaringologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
2 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
- Cochlear implantation trough the middle cranial fossa: a novel approach to access the basal turn of the cochlea(2013) BITTENCOURT, Aline Gomes; TSUJI, Robinson Koji; TEMPESTINI, Joao Paulo Ratto; JACOMO, Alfredo Luiz; BENTO, Ricardo Ferreira; BRITO, Rubens deThe classic approach for cochlear implant surgery includes mastoidectomy and posterior tympanotomy. The middle cranial fossa approach is a proven alternative, but it has been used only sporadically and inconsistently in cochlear implantation. Objective: To describe a new approach to expose the basal turn of the cochlea in cochlear implant surgery through the middle cranial fossa. Method: Fifty temporal bones were dissected in this anatomic study of the temporal bone. Cochleostomies were performed through the middle cranial fossa approach in the most superficial portion of the basal turn of the cochlea, using the meatal plane and the superior petrous sinus as landmarks. The lateral wall of the internal acoustic canal was dissected after the petrous apex had been drilled and stripped. The dissected wall of the inner acoustic canal was followed longitudinally to the cochleostomy. Results: Only the superficial portion of the basal turn of the cochlea was opened in the fifty temporal bones included in this study. The exposure of the basal turn of the cochlea allowed the visualization of the scala tympani and the scala vestibuli, which enabled the array to be easily inserted through the scala tympani. Conclusion: The proposed approach is simple to use and provides sufficient exposure of the basal turn of the cochlea.
- Post-lingual deafness: benefits of cochlear implants vs. conventional hearing aids(2012) BITTENCOURT, Aline Gomes; IKARI, Liliane Satomi; TORRE, Ana Adelina Giantomassi Della; BENTO, Ricardo Ferreira; TSUJI, Robinson Koji; BRITO NETO, Rubens Vuono deThe technological advances in cochlear implants and processing strategies have enabled subjects affected by severe to profound hearing loss to hear sounds and recognize speech in various different degrees. The variability of hearing outcomes in subjects with post-lingual deafness has been significant and cochlear implant indications have been extended to include an ever larger population. Objective: This paper aims to look into the groups of post-lingual deafness patients to find where cochlear implants have yielded better outcomes than conventional hearing aids. Materials and Methods: Review the literature available on databases SciELO, Cochrane, MEDLINE, and LILACS-BIREME. The publications selected for review were rated as A or B on evidence strength on the day of the review. Their authors analyzed and compared hearing aids and cochlear implants in populations of post-lingually deaf patients. Study Design: Systematic review. Results: Eleven out of the 2,169 papers searched were found to be pertinent to the topic and were rated B for evidence strength. Six studies were prospective cohort trials, four were cross-sectional studies and one was a clinical trial. Conclusion: The assessment done on the benefits yielded by post-lingually deaf subjects from cochlear implants showed that they are effective and provide for better results than conventional hearing aids.