VERUSKA MAGALHAES SCABIM

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
4
Lattes
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto Central, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
LIM/38 - Laboratório de Epidemiologia e Imunobiologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina

Filtros

Limpar filtros

Configurações

Revista / Livro: Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics ×

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
  • article 16 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Modified body adiposity index for body fat estimation in severe obesity
    (2017) BERNHARD, A. B.; SCABIM, V. M.; SERAFIM, M. P.; GADDUCCI, A. V.; SANTO, M. A.; CLEVA, R. de
    BackgroundThe body adiposity index (BAI) comprises a simple method for estimating body fat (BF) that needs to be validated in patients with severe obesity. The present study aimed to determine BAI accuracy with respect to the determination BF in patients with severe obesity. MethodsA cross-sectional prospective study comparing two methods for BF estimation was conducted in 433 patients with severe obesity between August 2012 to December 2014. BF was estimated by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) with specific equations developed for BF estimation in patients with severe obesity and BAI. The BF estimation in 240 patients with severe obesity (Group 1: G1) was used to evaluate BAI limitations and to develop a specific equationin this population. The new equationproposed was validated in another 158 patients with severe obesity (Group 2: G2). ResultsThere was a significant difference between BF determination by BIA and BAI (P=0.039). The mean (SD) BF in G1 was 52.3%(6.1%) determined by BIA and 51.6%(8.1%) determined by BAI. Sex, waist-hip ratio (WHR) and obesity grade determined significant errors on BF estimation by BAI. A new equation(modified body adiposity index; MBAI) was developed by linear regression to minimise these errors [MBAI%=23.6+0.5x(BAI); add 2.2 if body mass index50kgm(-2) and 2.4 if WHR1.05]. The new equationreduced the difference [1.2% (5.9%), P<0.001 to 0.4%(4.12%), P=0.315] and improved the correlation (0.6-0.7) between methods. ConclusionsBAI present significant limitations in severe obesity and MBAI was effective for BF estimation in this population.