JORGE MILHEM HADDAD

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
14
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto Central, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
LIM/58 - Laboratório de Ginecologia Estrutural e Molecular, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 8 de 8
  • article 25 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies on pelvic organ prolapse for the development of core outcome sets
    (2020) RADA, Maria Patricia; JONES, Stephanie; FALCONI, Gabriele; HADDAD, Jorge Milhem; BETSCHART, Cornelia; PERGIALIOTIS, Vasilios; DOUMOUCHTSIS, Stergios K.
    Aims In the current climate of evidence-based health care, the aim of this meta-synthesis was to collect and systematically analyse data from primary qualitative studies on pelvic organ prolapse (POP), to identify patient-centered perspectives on the natural course of POP. Information acquired in this study may be useful for ongoing research towards the development of core outcome sets (COS) in pelvic floor disorders. Methods A CHORUS Working Group performed a standardized search of three different databases (Medline, Embase, Scopus), from inception to October 2019. We selected qualitative studies on women's perspectives on POP that were published in the English language. Three reviewers independently evaluated the quality of eligible papers and highlighted recurrent themes based on patient perspectives. Results Eighteen qualitative studies including a total of 497 patients were assessed in this analysis. Our study revealed five superordinate themes, recurrently encountered in qualitative studies on POP: awareness of POP (6 studies), communication (9 studies), treatments (10 studies), effects on quality of life (6 studies), and self-image (3 studies). Five out of 10 quality criteria were met by all the studies included, based on an assessment performed using the critical appraisal skills program. Conclusions This is the first synthesis of qualitative studies that address POP-related experiences of women, highlighting five superordinate themes, of which treatment was the most commonly reported one. This synthesis' findings may guide quantitative research priorities and will hopefully contribute to the development of a COS for POP.
  • article 42 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Management of Apical Compartment Prolapse (Uterine and Vault Prolapse): A FIGO Working Group Report
    (2017) BETSCHART, Cornelia; CERVIGNI, Mauro; ORTIZ, Oscar Contreras; DOUMOUCHTSIS, Stergios K.; KOYAMA, Masayasu; MEDINA, Carlos; HADDAD, Jorge Milhem; TORRE, Filippo La; ZANNI, Giuliano
    Aim: Apical prolapse includes descent of the uterus, vagina cuff, or rarely solely of the cervix. It is estimated that women have an 11-19% life-time risk of undergoing surgery for POP. This rate is projected to increase over the next 2-3 decades. In this FIGO working group report we address the conservative and surgical treatment options for apical prolapse. Methods: The FIGO working group ""Pelvic Floor Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery"" describes the different treatments for apical prolapse based on the literature evidence, the cost-effectiveness, the degree of difficulty and summed them up with an experts recommendation. Results: Among the conservative treatment options, pessaries are the most successful options since centuries with a low complication rate and low costs. Among the vaginal operative procedures the sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) and the uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS) show comparable outcomes and efficacy with a different, however, rather low complication pattern and a favorable cost-benefit profile. Sacrocolpopexy, independent on the open abdominal, laparoscopic, or robotic-assisted laparoscopic technique has a good durability and quality of life performance. The minimal invasive techniques are as effective as the open abdominal techniques and there is no difference in mesh exposure. Conclusion: Vaginal procedures are well described procedures with favorable outcomes and cost-benefit profiles. Sacral colpopexy has a high-effectivity; data on the route of performance and long-term outcome are awaited. The cost with mesh implants are higher compared to the operations with autologous tissue or any conservative treatment and further studies are recommended to evaluate the cure rates in the span of decades and the possible long-term mesh complications. (C) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
  • conferenceObject
  • article 14 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    A multicenter, randomized trial comparing pelvic organ prolapse surgical treatment with native tissue and synthetic mesh: A 5-year follow-up study
    (2020) SILVEIRA, Simone dos Reis B. da; AUGE, Antomio P. F.; JARMY-DIBELLA, Zsuzsanna I. K.; MARGARIDO, Paulo F. R.; CARRAMAO, Silvia; RODRIGUES, Claudinei Alves; DOUMOUCHTSIS, Stergios K.; BARACAT, Edmund Chada; HADDAD, Jorge Milhem
    Introduction The aim of this study was to compare long-term outcomes in patients who underwent either native tissue repair or monofilament macroporous polypropylene mesh. Methods This multicenter, randomized trial included-at the end of 5 years follow-up-122 women with severe pelvic organ prolapse, who were randomly assigned to undergo surgical treatment using native tissue repair (native tissue group, n = 59) or synthetic mesh repair (mesh group, n = 63). Cure criterion was when pelvic organ prolapse-quantification (POP-Q) point was <= 0. Quality of life was assessed using the prolapse quality-of-life questionnaire and sexual function with the quality of sexual function. Results Groups were homogeneous preoperatively with the exception of the previous pelvic surgery variable, which was higher in mesh (P = .019). Cure rate was significantly better for mesh group in the anterior compartment (P = .002) and in the combination of all compartments (P = .001). Native tissue group was significantly better when there was prolapse in the posterior and apical compartment (P = .031). In the quality of life analysis, mesh group showed a significant improvement compared with native tissue group (P = .004). Complications were significantly higher in mesh and recurrence in native tissue. Regarding the reoperation rate, there was no difference between groups, but native tissue had a higher reoperation rate due to recurrence (P = .031). Conclusions Outcomes in women with severe POP were better with mesh use than native tissue repair, both in the anterior compartment and in the multicompartmental prolapse after 5-year follow-up. Complications were more common in the mesh group and recurrences were more frequent in the native tissue group.
  • article 1 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    A randomized trial comparing vaginal laser therapy and pelvic floor physical therapy for treating women with stress urinary incontinence
    (2023) FONSECA, Lucilia C. da; GIARRETA, Fernanda Bacchi Ambrosano; PETERSON, Thais V.; LOCALI, Priscila Katsumi Matsuoka; BARACAT, Edmund C.; FERREIRA, Elizabeth A. Goncalves; HADDAD, Jorge Milhem
    IntroductionFemale stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is considered a major public health issue. Physical therapy is an important conservative treatment; however, it is primarily limited by poor long-term compliance. Furthermore, surgical treatment entails significant risks. Therefore, new treatment techniques must be identified. ObjectiveTo compare the use of laser therapy and pelvic floor (PF) physical therapy for treating postmenopausal women with SUI. MethodsThis pilot study enrolled 40 women with a clinical and urodynamic diagnosis of SUI who were randomized into two groups: those who received erbium-doped yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser therapy implemented over three sessions with a 1-month interval (n = 20) and those who received physical therapy with supervision twice a week for 3 months (n = 20). In total, 16 women completed the treatment in each group. The patients were assessed for PF function using the modified Oxford scale and for pelvic organ prolapse using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System. The 1-h pad test and quality of life questionnaires, King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ), and Incontinence Quality of Life (IQOL) were also administered. Patients were re-evaluated at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment. ResultsThe mean patient age was 62.7 & PLUSMN; 9.1 and 57.9 & PLUSMN; 6.1 years, median Oxford score at baseline was 3 (2-4.5) and 4 (3-4), mean IQOL score was 79.8 & PLUSMN; 17 and 74.6 & PLUSMN; 18 for physical therapy group (PTG) and laser group (LG), respectively. For the amount of urine leak in the 1-h pad test evaluation, we found significance for the interaction of group and time points only for the Laser intragroup. The cure rate, that is, the rate of reaching an insignificant score in the pad test, at 6 and 12 months was 43.75% and 50% in PTG and 62.5% and 56.25% in the LG, respectively (p > 0.05). IQOL scores demonstrated considerable improvement in both groups (p > 0.05). Upon comparing the initial and follow-up results, the LG showed an improvement at all consultations, whereas the PTG showed improvements at 1, 3, and 6 months but not at 12 months after treatment. KHQ analysis revealed a considerable improvement in the quality of life (QOL) of patients over time, with no substantial difference between the groups. QOL comparison before and after treatment revealed that the vaginal LG improved more consistently in some domains. Only the PTG showed a significant increase in the mean Oxford score from pretreatment to 1 and 3 months after treatment (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). However, no statistically significant difference was observed between the groups. ConclusionBoth treatments are safe and have a positive influence on the impact of UI on patients' QOL. The laser caused a greater reduction in the urinary loss, as measured using the weight of pad test, at 6-month and 12-month after treatment without difference with PTG at the end of the follow-up.
  • conferenceObject
    THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOCIOECONOMIC CLASS AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN WOMEN WITH AND WITHOUT PELVIC FLOOR DYSFUNCTION
    (2014) BOMBONATO, A.; BEZERRA, L. R. P. S.; FROTA, R. I. P.; VASCONCELOS NETO, J. A.; VASCONCELOS, C. T. M.; KARBAGE, S. A. Lino; AUGUSTO, L. K. L.; BILHAR, A. P. Monteiro; CAVALCANTI JUNIOR, M.; CIDRAO, A. L.; HADDAD, J. M.; BARACAT, E. C.
  • article 24 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    A systematic review on reporting outcomes and outcome measures in trials on synthetic mesh procedures for pelvic organ prolapse: Urgent action is needed to improve quality of research
    (2019) LOURENCO, Thais R. de Mattos; PERGIALIOTIS, Vasilis; DUFFY, James M. N.; DURNEA, Constantin; ELFITURI, Abdullatif; HADDAD, Jorge M.; BETSCHART, Cornelia; FALCONI, Gabriele; DOUMOUCHTSIS, Stergios K.
    The use of synthetic mesh in pelvic organ prolapse surgery is being closely scrutinized because of serious concerns regarding life-changing complications such as erosion, pain, infection, bleeding, dyspareunia, organ perforation, and urinary problems. Randomized trials and their syntheses in meta-analysis offer a unique opportunity to assess efficacy and safety. However, outcomes and outcome measures need to be consistently selected, collected, and reported across randomized trials to be effectively combined in systematic reviews. Aims We evaluated outcome and outcome measure reporting across randomized controlled trials on surgical interventions using synthetic mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Methods Systematic review of randomized controlled trials using synthetic mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. The selected studies were evaluated using Jadad and MOMENT criteria. Outcomes and outcome measures were systematically identified and categorized. Results Seventy-one randomized trials were included. Twenty-four different types of mesh were identified. Included trials reported 110 different outcomes and 60 outcome measures. Erosion (40 trials, 78%), pain (29 trials, 56%), bleeding (31 trials, 61%), and dyspareunia (25 trials, 49%) were the most frequently reported outcomes. The longest follow up was 74 months. Conclusions Most randomized trials evaluating surgical interventions using synthetic mesh for pelvic organ prolapse failed to report on clinically important outcomes and to evaluate efficacy and safety over the medium- and long-term. Developing and implementing a minimum data set, known as a core outcome set, in future vaginal prolapse trials could help address these issues.
  • conferenceObject