IAN WARD ABDALLA MAIA

Índice h a partir de 2011
1
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto Central, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
LIM/51 - Laboratório de Emergências Clínicas, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 7 de 7
  • article 2 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Effect of Bougie Use on First-Attempt Success in Tracheal Intubations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    (2024) HELLMANN, Rafael von; FUHR, Natalia; MAIA, Ian Ward A.; GERBERI, Danielle; PEDROLLO, Daniel; BELLOLIO, Fernanda; SILVA, Lucas Oliveira J. e
    The use of a bougie, a flexible endotracheal tube introducer, has been proposed to optimize first-attempt success in emergency department intubations. We aimed to evaluate the available evidence on the association of bougie use in the first attempt and success in tracheal intubations. This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that evaluated first-attempt success between adults intubated with a bougie versus without a bougie (usually with a stylet) in all settings. Manikin and cadaver studies were excluded. A trials and comparative observational studies from inception to June 2023. Study selection and data extraction were done in duplicate by 2 independent reviewers. We conducted a meta-analysis with random-effects models, and we used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence at the outcome level. We screened a total of 2,699 studies, and 133 were selected for full-text review. A total of 18 studies, including 12 randomized controlled trials, underwent quantitative analysis. In the meta-analysis of 18 studies (9,151 patients), bougie use was associated with increased first-attempt intubation success (pooled risk ratio [RR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06 to 1.17, low certainty evidence). Bougie use was associated with increased first-attempt success across all analyzed subgroups with similar effect estimates, including in emergency intubations (9 studies; 8,070 patients; RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.16, low certainty). The highest point estimate favoring the use of a bougie was in the subgroup of patients with Cormack-Lehane III or IV (5 studies, 585 patients, RR 1.60, 95% CI 1.40 to 1.84, moderate certainty). In this meta-analysis, the bougie as an aid in the first intubation attempt was associated with increased success. Despite the certainty of evidence being low, these data suggest that a bougie should probably be used first and not as a rescue device in emergency intubations. [Ann Emerg Med. 2024;83:132-144.]
  • article 0 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    What is new in academic international medicine? The importance of collaboration in postpandemic times
    (2022) SCHUBERT, Daniel Ujakow Correa; MAIA, Ian Ward Abdalla; SILVA, Lucas Oliveira J. e; GUIMARAES, Helio Penna
  • conferenceObject
    Brazilian Airway Registry COoperation: The First 1,000 Emergency Intubations of the BARCO Study
    (2023) MAIA, I. W. A.; ALENCAR, J.; MARCHINI, J.; SILVA, E. L. O. J.; GOMES, L.; MARINO, L.; VAISBERG, V.; STANZANI, G.; NOGUEIRA, C.; KROEFF, B.; SOUZA, H.
  • conferenceObject
    Brazilian Airway Registry COoperation: Comparison Between Intubations Performed by Emergency Physicians or Non-Emergency Physicians
    (2023) BETONI, H.; MAIA, I. W. A.; MARCHINI, J.; ALENCAR, J.; MARINO, L.; OLIVEIRA, G.; ALONSO, G.; STANZANI, G.; VAISBERG, V.; GOMEZ, L.; SOUZA, H.
  • conferenceObject
    Brazilian Airway Registry COoperation: Comparison Between Intubations Performed With or Without Videolaryngoscope
    (2023) OLIVEIRA, G.; MAIA, I. W. A.; ALENCAR, J.; ALONSO, G.; BETONI, H.; GOMES, L.; MARCHINI, J.; MARINO, L.; SOUZA, H.; VAISBERG, V.; STANZANI, G.
  • conferenceObject
    Neuronal Death-associated Proteins S100B, Tau and Neuron Specific Enolase Association to Sepsis-related Organ Dysfunction and Death in the Elderly: A Prospective Single Center Cohort Study
    (2022) VAISBERG, V.; ALENCAR, Garcia J. de; SARDINHA, A.; CARVALHO, M. de; GOMEZ, L. G.; ITO, G.; MAIA, I. A.; MARINO, L.; MARCHINI, J.; SOUZA, H. de
  • article 0 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Prognostic accuracy of qSOFA at triage in patients with suspected infection in a Brazilian emergency department
    (2021) MAIA, Ian Ward A.; SILVA, Lucas Oliveira J. E.; HERPICH, Henrique; DIOGO, Luciano; SANTANA, Joao Carlos Batista; PEDROLLO, Daniel; PEREZ, Mario Castro Alvarez; NICOLAIDIS, Rafael
    Objective: To evaluate the prognostic accuracy of qSOFA for predicting in-hospital mortality among patients with suspected infection presenting to the ED of a public tertiary hospital in Brazil. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients (age >= 18 years) with suspected infection who presented to an academic tertiary ED in Porto Alegre (Southern Brazil) during an 18-month period. The qSOFA was calculated by using information collected at triage and patients were followed throughout hospitalization for the primary outcome of in-hospital mortality. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratios with corresponding 95% CIs were calculated for the qSOFA and qSOFA65. Results: A total of 7523 ED visits of patients with suspected infection in which an intravenous antibiotic was administered within 24 h were included, which resulted in 908 in-hospital deaths (12.1%). There were 690 (9.2%) patients whose triage qSOFA was >= 2 points. When such cutoff was used, the sensitivity for in-hospital death was 24.6% (95% CI 21.8 to 27.4%) and the specificity was 92.9% (95% CI 92.3% to 93.5%). The sensitivity increased to 67.4% (95% G 64.2% to 70.3%) when a cutoff of >= 1 was tested, but the specificity decreased to 55.3% (95% CI 54.1% to 565%). Using a cutoff of >= 2, the qSOFA65 had a sensitivity of 51.0% (95% CI 47.7% to 54.3%) and a specificity of 75.7% (95% CI 74.6% to 76.7%). Conclusions: The qSOFA score yielded very low sensitivity in predicting in-hospital mortality. Emergency physicians or ED triage nurses in low-to-middle income countries should not be using qSOFA or qSOFA65 as ""rule-out"" screening tools in the initial evaluation of patients with suspected infection.