ANA RUBIA GUEDES VINHOLE

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
5
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
PAHC, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 3 de 3
  • article 2 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Disinfection of 3D-printed protective face shield during COVID-19 pandemic
    (2021) NOGUERA, Saidy Vasconez; ESPINOZA, Evelyn Patricia Sanchez; CORTES, Marina Farrel; OSHIRO, Izabel Cristina Vilela; SPADAO, Fernanda de Sousa; BRANDAO, Laura Maria Brasileiro; BARROS, Ana Natiele da Silva; COSTA, Sibeli; ALMEIDA, Bianca Leal de; SORIANO, Paula Gemignani; SALLES, Alessandra Grassi; ESCORCIO, Mirian Elizabete Marques; BARRETTI, Cristina Madeira; BAPTISTA, Fernanda Spadotto; ALVARENGA, Glaura Souza; MARINHO, Igor; LETAIF, Leila Suemi Harima; LI, Ho Ye; BACCHI, Pedro; SANTOS, Ana Rubia Guedes dos; REGADAS, Lucas Borges; BRAGA, Carlos Eduardo Lima; ZSIGMOND, Fabio; SEGURADO, Aluisio Cotrim; GUIMARAES, Thais; LEVIN, Anna Sara; BERTOLDI, Cristiane Aun; CATALANI, Luiz Henrique; ZANCUL, Eduardo de Senzi; COSTA, Silvia Figueiredo
    This study assessed the disinfection using 70% ethanol; H2O2-quaternary ammonium salt mixture; 0.1% sodium hypochlorite and autoclaving of four 3D-printed face shields with different designs, visor materials; and visor thickness (0.5-0.75 mm). We also investigated their clinical suitability by applying a questionnaire to health workers (HW) who used them. Each type of disinfection was done 40 times on each type of mask without physical damage. In contrast, autoclaving led to appreciable damage.
  • article 1 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Statewide evaluation of infection control measures for preventing coronavirus disease 2019 in hemodia-lysis facilities
    (2021) GUEDES, Ana Rubia; TAVARES, Bruno de Melo; ASSIS, Denise Brandao de; FREIRE, Maristela Pinheiro; MADALOSSO, Geraldine; LEVIN, Anna S.; PERDIGAO NETO, Lauro Vieira; OLIVEIRA, Maura Salaroli de
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the occurrence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in hemodialysis facilities and the occurrence of and risk factors for clustering of COVID-19 cases. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey between March and July 2020, in all dialysis facilities in Sao Paulo state, using Google Forms. The online questionnaire contained questions addressing specific components of infection prevention and control practices and the number of cases during the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: A total of 1,093 (5%) COVID-19 cases were reported among 20,984 patients; approximately 56% of the facilities had X1 cluster. Most facilities implemented various measures (such as allocation of dedicated COVID-19 areas/shifts, symptom screening, environmental disinfection, and maintenance of adequate ventilation) to prevent the transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Clustering of COVID-19 cases was suspected in only 7% of dialysis facilities. The only variable associated with this event was the performance of aerosol-generating procedures (odds ratio: 4.74; 95% confidence interval: 1.75-12.86). CONCLUSION: Attention should be paid to avoiding the performance of aerosol-generating procedures in dialysis facilities and monitoring the clustering of cases.
  • article 13 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Decontamination and re-use of surgical masks and respirators during the COVID-19 pandemic
    (2021) CORTES, Marina Farrel; ESPINOZA, Evelyn Patricia Sanchez; NOGUERA, Saidy Liceth Vasconez; SILVA, Aline Alves; MEDEIROS, Marion Elke Sielfeld Araya de; BOAS, Lucy Santos Villas; FERREIRA, Noely Evangelista; TOZETTO-MENDOZA, Tania Regina; MORAIS, Fernando Goncalves; QUEIROZ, Rayana Santiago de; PROENCA, Adriana Coracini Tonacio de; GUIMARAES, Thais; GUEDES, Ana Rubia; LETAIF, Leila Suemi Harima; MONTAL, Amanda Cardoso; MENDES-CORREA, Maria Cassia; JOHN, Vanderley M.; LEVIN, Anna S.; COSTA, Silvia Figueiredo
    Objectives: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic increased global demand for personal protective equipment (PPE) and resulted in shortages. The study evaluated the re-use of surgical masks and respirators by analysing their performance and safety before and after reprocessing using the following methods: oven, thermal drying, autoclave, and hydrogen peroxide plasma vapour. Methods: In total, 45 surgical masks and 69 respirators were decontaminated. Visual integrity, air permeability, burst resistance, pressure differential and particulate filtration efficiency of new and decontaminated surgical masks and respirators were evaluated. In addition, 14 used respirators were analysed after work shifts before and after decontamination using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and viral culturing. Finally, reprocessed respirators were evaluated by users in terms of functionality and comfort. Results: Oven decontamination (75 degrees C for 45 min) was found to be the simplest decontamination method. Physical and filtration assays indicated that all reprocessing methods were safe after one cycle. Oven decontamination maintained the characteristics of surgical masks and respirators for at least five reprocessing cycles. Viral RNA was detected by RT-PCR in two of the 14 used respirators. Four respirators submitted to viral culture were PCR-negative and culture-negative. Reprocessed respirators used in work shifts were evaluated positively by users, even after three decontamination cycles. Conclusion: Oven decontamination is a safe method for reprocessing surgical masks and respirators for at least five cycles, and is feasible in the hospital setting. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases.