CLEIDE MARIA CAETANO BAPTISTA

Índice h a partir de 2011
3
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
SCCLCIRE-62, Hospital Universitário

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
  • article 6 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Indicadores de prevalência de úlcera por pressão e incidência de queda de paciente em hospitais de ensino do município de São Paulo
    (2015) MELLEIRO, Marta Maria; TRONCHIN, Daisy Maria Rizatto; BAPTISTA, Cleide Maria Caetano; BRAGA, Aline Togni; PAULINO, Ariane; KURCGANT, Paulina
    ABSTRACT Objective To measure the prevalence of pressure ulcers and the incidence of patient falls in three teaching hospitals in the city of São Paulo. Method Quantitative, exploratory and descriptive study. Data were collected from August 2012 to July 2013 using a form. They were analyzed according to descriptive and inferential statistics. Results The annual mean of pressure ulcers overall prevalence (PU) was of 10.1%, and the incidence of patient falls was of 13.8%. Conclusion Patients of Hospital 3 were the most vulnerable to pressure ulcers and falls, probably due to the aggressiveness of the disease and the complex treatments these patients were undergoing. Implementation of such indicators has enabled benchmarking and review of both assistance and management institutional protocols.
  • article 14 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Custo direto dos curativos de úlceras por pressão em pacientes hospitalizados
    (2016) LIMA, Antônio Fernandes Costa; CASTILHO, Valéria; BAPTISTA, Cleide Maria Caetano; ROGENSKI, Noemi Marisa Brunet; ROGENSKI, Karin Emília
    ABSTRACT Objective: to identify the average direct cost (ADC) on the direct labor (DL) for nurses and the consumption of materials and solutions used in performing dressings for pressure ulcers (PU) in hospitalized patients. Methods: case study, exploratory and descriptive case conducted in a teaching hospital. For six months, 228 dressings were performed for the treatment of PU patients. We calculated the cost by multiplying the time spent by nurses by the DL unit cost, adding to the cost of materials and solutions consumed. Results: the dressings ADC of PU corresponds to US$ 19.18 (PUs-category I); US$ 6.50 (PUs-category II); US$ 12.34 (PUs-category III); US$ 5.84 (PUs-category IV); US$ 9.52 (PUs-unclassifiable) and US$ 3.76 (PU suspected deep tissue injury). Conclusion: the methodology used can be reproduced in different hospital settings for the development of other studies to expand and complement the knowledge gained.