CLEIDE MARIA CAETANO BAPTISTA
Índice h a partir de 2011
3
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
SCCLCIRE-62, Hospital Universitário
2 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
- Transitional care from hospital to home for older people: implementation of best practices(2020) COSTA, Maria Fernanda Baeta Neves Alonso da; SICHIERI, Karina; POVEDA, Vanessa de Brito; BAPTISTA, Cleide Maria Caetano; AGUADO, Priscila CantoniObjective: to assess the conformity of nursing care concerning best evidence in transitional care from hospital to home for older people. Methods: a project to implement best evidence based on the model proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute in surgical clinic of a university hospital with older people, caregivers or family members, and nurses, between July and August 2019. Eight evidence-based criteria have been audited through interviews, medical records and computerized system, presented in percentages. Results: the highest non-compliance rate found in a baseline audit was absence of continued training on transitional care and hospital discharge plan. Identifying barriers to best practices included educational programs; afterwards, there was an improvement in compliance rates in all the criteria assessed. Final considerations: the criteria based on audited evidence showed an increase in compliance rates with the strategies implemented, contributing to improving transitional care for older people.
- Custo direto dos curativos de úlceras por pressão em pacientes hospitalizados(2016) LIMA, Antônio Fernandes Costa; CASTILHO, Valéria; BAPTISTA, Cleide Maria Caetano; ROGENSKI, Noemi Marisa Brunet; ROGENSKI, Karin EmíliaABSTRACT Objective: to identify the average direct cost (ADC) on the direct labor (DL) for nurses and the consumption of materials and solutions used in performing dressings for pressure ulcers (PU) in hospitalized patients. Methods: case study, exploratory and descriptive case conducted in a teaching hospital. For six months, 228 dressings were performed for the treatment of PU patients. We calculated the cost by multiplying the time spent by nurses by the DL unit cost, adding to the cost of materials and solutions consumed. Results: the dressings ADC of PU corresponds to US$ 19.18 (PUs-category I); US$ 6.50 (PUs-category II); US$ 12.34 (PUs-category III); US$ 5.84 (PUs-category IV); US$ 9.52 (PUs-unclassifiable) and US$ 3.76 (PU suspected deep tissue injury). Conclusion: the methodology used can be reproduced in different hospital settings for the development of other studies to expand and complement the knowledge gained.