JURACI APARECIDA ROCHA

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
4
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
PAHC, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 6 de 6
  • article 0 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Criterion validity and inter-rater reliability o a palliative care screening tool for patients admitted to an emergency department intensive care unit
    (2018) RIBEIRO, Sabrina Correa da Costa; CARVALHO, Ricardo Tavares de; ROCHA, Juraci Aparecida; DIAS, Roger Daglius
    Objective. The use of palliative care (PC) screening criteria to trigger PC consultations may optimize the utilization of PC services, improve patient comfort, and reduce invasive and futile end-of-life care. The aim of the present study was to assess the criterion validity and inter-rater reliability of a PC screening tool for patients admitted to an emergency department intensive care unit (ED-ICU). Method. Observational retrospective study evaluating PC screening criteria based on the presence of advanced diagnosis and the use of two ""surprise questions"" (traditional and modified). Patients were classified at ED-ICU admission in four categories according to the proposed algorithm. Result. A total of 510 patients were included in the analysis. From these, 337 (66.1%) were category 1, 0 (0.0%) category 2, 63 (12.4%) category 3, and 110 (21.6%) category 4. Severity of illness (Simplified Acute Physiology Score III score and mechanical ventilation), mortality (ED-ICU and intrahospital), and PC-related measures (order for a PC consultation, time between admission and PC consultation, and transfer to a PC bed) were significantly different across groups, more evidently between categories 4 and 1. Category 3 patients presented similar outcomes to patients in category 1 for severity of illness and mortality. However, category 3 patients had a PC consultation ordered more frequently than did category 1 patients. The screening criteria were assessed by two independent raters (n = 100), and a substantial interrater reliability was found, with 80% of agreement and a kappa coefficient of 0.75 (95% confidence interval = 0.62, 0.88). Significance of results. This study is the first step toward the implementation of a PC screening tool in the ED-ICU. The tool was able to discriminate three groups of patients within a spectrum of increasing severity of illness, risk of death, and PC needs, presenting substantial inter-rater reliability. Future research should investigate the implementation of these screening criteria into routine practice of an ED-ICU.
  • bookPart
    Atuação emergencial da unidade de cuidados paliativos do HC-FMUSP na pandemia Covid-19
    (2022) CARVALHO, Ricardo Tavares de; ROCHA, Juraci Aparecida
  • bookPart
    Prefácio
    (2019) CARVALHO, Ricardo Tavares de; ROCHA, Juraci Aparecida; FRANCK, Ednalda Maria
  • conferenceObject
    SEVERE SARS-COV-2 INFECTION IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE AND LUNG DISEASE. OUTCOMES AND REFERRAL FOR PALLIATIVE CARE IN A TERTIARY CENTER IN SAO PAULO, BRAZIL
    (2022) GUELLI, Mariana Sandoval Terra Campos; ZAMPIER, Daniela; MONEZZI, Paula Pinto; TSUDA, Victor Massatochi Kawakami; BRANDAO, Ana Beatriz; GARCIA, Monica Estuque; ROCHA, Juraci; CARVALHO, Ricardo Tavares de
  • article 2 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Evaluation of a New Triage Protocol for Palliative Care for Patients with COVID-19 in Brazil
    (2023) CORREA, Tulio Loyola; SIMAO, Aurea Maria Salomao; SOBREIRA, Joyce Veceli Barros; ANBAR, Fernanda Baeninger; YARSHELL, Flavia; BRANDAO, Ana Beatriz; ESTUQUE, Monica Queiros; ROCHA, Juraci Aparecida; CARVALHO, Ricardo Tavares de
    Objectives: To evaluate the implementation of a triage protocol for palliative care (PC) during the COVID-19 pandemic (PALI-COVID) at a referral center in Brazil.Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted. Based on the triage protocol, patients were classified into a red group, a yellow group, and a green group (GG). Patients should receive PC as recommended for each group.Results: A total of 1517 patients were included in the analysis. About 11% (n = 162) of patients received PC. About 35% (n = 529) of all patients died. There was a significant difference in the mortality rate between the groups; the GG had the highest mortality rate. Most patients who died (77.1%) did not receive PC.Conclusion: PALI-COVID was effective in identifying patients who had a higher risk of death and needed end-of-life support. Despite the protocol, few patients received PC.