DAGOBERTO CALLEGARO
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto Central, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
LIM/45 - Laboratório de Fisiopatologia Neurocirúrgica, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
LIM/62 - Laboratório de Fisiopatologia Cirúrgica, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
LIM/45 - Laboratório de Fisiopatologia Neurocirúrgica, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
LIM/62 - Laboratório de Fisiopatologia Cirúrgica, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
4 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 4 de 4
- Real-world application of the 2022 diagnostic criteria for first-ever episode of optic neuritis(2023) TERRIM, Sara; SILVA, Guilherme Diogo; FALCAO, Fernando Cavalcanti de Sa e Benevides; PEREIRA, Clarissa dos Reis; BENASSI, Thais de Souza Andrade; FORTINI, Ida; GONCALVES, Marcia Rubia Rodrigues; CASTRO, Luiz Henrique Martins; COMERLATTI, Luiz Roberto; RIMKUS, Carolina de Medeiros; ADONI, Tarso; PEREIRA, Samira Luisa Apostolos; MONTEIRO, Mario Luiz; CALLEGARO, DagobertoOptic neuritis (ON) admits diverse differential diagnoses. Petzold proposed diagnostic criteria for ON in 2022, although real-world application of these criteria is missing. We conducted a retrospective review of patients with ON. We classified patients into definite or possible ON, and into groups A (typical neuritis), B (painless), or C (binocular) and estimated the frequency of etiologies for each group. We included 77 patients, with 62% definite and 38% possible ON. CRION and NMOSD-AQP4 negative-ON were less commonly seen in definite ON. Application of the 2022 criteria revealed a lower-than-expected frequency of definite ON, particularly for seronegative non-MS causes.
- Misdiagnosis in multiple sclerosis in a Brazilian reference center: Clinical, radiological, laboratory profile and failures in the diagnostic process-Cohort study(2023) TIEPPO, Eduardo Macedo de Souza; SILVA, Guilherme Diogo; SILVA, Tomas Fraga Ferreira da; ARAUJO, Roger Santana de; OLIVEIRA, Mateus Boaventura de; SPRICIGO, Mariana Gondim Peixoto; PIMENTEL, Gabriela Almeida; CAMPANA, Igor Gusmao; CASTRILLO, Bruno Batitucci; MENDES, Natalia Trombini; TEIXEIRA, Larissa Silva; NUNES, Douglas Mendes; RIMKUS, Carolina de Medeiros; ADONI, Tarso; PEREIRA, Samira Luisa Apostolos; CALLEGARO, DagobertoBackground: Multiple sclerosis misdiagnosis remains a problem despite the well-validated McDonald 2017. For proper evaluation of errors in the diagnostic process that lead to misdiagnosis, it is adequate to incorporate patients who are already under regular follow-up at reference centers of demyelinating diseases. Objectives: To evaluate multiple sclerosis misdiagnosis in patients who are on follow-up at a reference center of demyelinating diseases in Brazil. Methods: We designed an observational study including patients in regular follow-up, who were diagnosed with multiple sclerosis at our specialized outpatient clinic in the Hospital of Clinics in the University of Sao Paulo, from 1996 to 2021, and were reassessed for misdiagnosis in 2022. We evaluated demographic information, clinical profile, and complementary exams and classified participants as ""established multiple sclerosis,"" ""non-multiple sclerosis, diagnosed,"" and ""non-multiple sclerosis, undiagnosed."" Failures in the diagnostic process were assessed by the modified Diagnostic Error Evaluation and Research tool. Results: A total of 201 patients were included. After analysis, 191/201 (95.02%) participants were confirmed as ""established multiple sclerosis,"" 5/201 (2.49%) were defined as ""non-multiple sclerosis, diagnosed,"" and 5/201 (2.49%) were defined as ""non-multiple sclerosis, undiagnosed."" Conclusions: Multiple sclerosis misdiagnosis persists in reference centers, emphasizing the need for careful interpretation of clinical findings to prevent errors.
- Therapeutic plasma exchange for neuromyelitis optica attacks: Evidence and challenges from a real-world cohort from Brazil(2024) ALMEIDA, Guilherme Mello Ramos de; ARAUJO, Roger Santana de; CASTRILLO, Bruno Batitucci; SILVA, Guilherme Diogo; FORTINI, Ida; GONCALVES, Marcia Rubia Rodrigues; CASTRO, Luiz Henrique Martins; TATSUI, Nelson Hidekazu; ADONI, Tarso; SATO, Douglas Kazutoshi; APOSTOLOS-PEREIRA, Samira Luisa; CALLEGARO, DagobertoTherapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) can improve disability recovery after neuromyelitis optica spectrum disease (NMOSD) attacks, but its effectiveness and safety in Latin-American patients with access barriers and diverse ethnicity is underexplored. We carried out a retrospective cohort study with NMOSD patients that underwent TPE. 84 NMOSD attacks in 68 patients were evaluated. Despite a median 25-day delay from symptom onset to TPE, 65,5% of patients showed significant improvement. Adverse events occurred in 39% of patients, usually transitory and with no fatalities.
- Vitamin D3 as an add-on treatment for multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials(2024) MAHLER, Joao Vitor; SOLTI, Marina; APOSTOLS-PEREIRA, Samira Luisa; ADONI, Tarso; SILVA, Guilherme Diogo; CALLEGARO, DagobertoBackground: Vitamin D deficiency has been linked to a higher risk of multiple sclerosis (MS) and disease progression. However, the efficacy of vitamin D3 as an adjuvant therapy for MS remains a controversial topic. Objective: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to assess the impact of adjunct high-dose vitamin D3 on clinical and radiological outcomes. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for trials published until December 18th, 2022. Authors independently selected randomized controlled trials involving patients with MS, with an intervention group receiving high dose (>= 1000 IU/day) cholecalciferol and reporting clinical or radiological outcomes. Authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias using a standardized, pilot-tested form. The meta-analysis was conducted using RStudio for EDSS at the last follow-up, ARR, and new T2 lesion count. Results: We included 9 studies with 867 participants. No significant reduction of EDSS (MD = 0.02, CI 95 % [-0.37; 0.41], p = 0.91), ARR (MD -0.03, CI 95 % [-0.08; 0.02], p = 0.26), or new T2 lesions (MD -0.59, CI 95 % [-1.24;0.07], p = 0.08) was observed at 6-24 months. We found no evidence of publication bias. Conclusion: The findings of this meta-analysis strengthen current evidence that vitamin D3 supplementation has no significant impact on clinical outcomes in patients with MS. However, the non-significant reduction of new T2 lesions could precede long-term clinical benefits and should be validated in additional studies.