DAGOBERTO CALLEGARO
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto Central, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
LIM/45 - Laboratório de Fisiopatologia Neurocirúrgica, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
LIM/62 - Laboratório de Fisiopatologia Cirúrgica, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
LIM/45 - Laboratório de Fisiopatologia Neurocirúrgica, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
LIM/62 - Laboratório de Fisiopatologia Cirúrgica, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
6 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 6 de 6
- A comparative study of visual outcome in patients with optic neuritis treated with five or seven days of intravenous corticosteroid treatment(2023) SILVA, Guilherme Diogo; TERRIM, Sara; FALCAO, Fernando Cavalcantide Sa e Benevides; FALCA, Maria Alice Pimentel; CHAVES, Cleuber Esteves; APOSTOLOS-PEREIRA, Samira; FORTINI, Ida; GONCALVES, Marcia Rubia Rodrigues; COMERLATTI, Luiz Roberto; CASTRO, Luiz Henrique Martins; CALLEGARO, Dagoberto; MONTEIRO, Mario Luiz RibeiroBackground: Optic neuritis (ON), a major cause of visual impairment in young adults, is generally associated with rapid visual recovery when treated with intravenous methylprednisolone treatment (IVMPT). However, the optimal duration of such treatment is unknown, ranging from three to seven days in clinical practice. We aimed to compare the visual recovery in patients treated with 5-day or 7-day duration IVMPT.Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with ON in Sa similar to o Paulo, Brazil, from 2016 to 2021. We compared the proportion of participants with visual impairment in 5-day and 7-day treatment schedules at discharge, at 1 month and between 6 and 12 months after the diagnosis of ON. The findings were adjusted to age, severity of the visual impairment, co-intervention with plasma exchange, time from symptom onset to IVMPT and the etiology of the ON to mitigate indication bias.Results: We included 73 patients with ON treated with 5 or 7-day duration of 1 g/d intravenous methylprednisolone therapy. Visual impairment at 6-12 months in the 5-day or the 7-day treatment groups was similar (57% x 59%, p > 0.9, Odds Ratio 1.03 [95% CI 0.59-1.84]). The results were similar after adjusting for prognostic variables and when observed at different time points.Conclusion: Visual recovery is similar in patients treated with 5-day and 7-day duration treatments of 1 g/day intravenous methylprednisolone, suggesting a ceiling effect. Limiting the duration of the treatment can reduce hospital stay and costs, without interfering with clinical benefit.
- Paracentral Acute Middle Maculopathy Associated with Severe Anti-Mog (Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein)-Positive Optic Neuritis(2023) FERNANDES, Rodrigo Dahia; ANDRADE, Thais de Souza; PRETI, Rony C. C.; ZACHARIAS, Leandro C. C.; SILVA, Guilherme Diogo; LUCATO, Leandro Tavares; APOSTOLOS-PEREIRA, Samira L. L.; CALLEGARO, Dagoberto; MONTEIRO, Mario Luiz R.Retinal complications in patients with inflammatory optic neuritis (ON) are generally related to post-infectious neuroretinitis and are considered uncommon in autoimmune/demyelinating ON, whether isolated or caused by multiple sclerosis (MS) or neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). More recently, however, cases with retinal complications have been reported in subjects positive for myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibodies. We report a 53-year-old woman presenting with severe bilateral ON associated with a focal area of paracentral acute middle maculopathy (PAMM) in one eye. Visual loss recovered remarkably after high-dose intravenous corticosteroid treatment and plasmapheresis, but the PAMM lesion remained visible on both optical coherence tomography and angiography as an ischaemic lesion affecting the middle layers of the retina. The report emphasises the possible occurrence of retinal vascular complications in MOG-related optic neuritis, an important addition to the diagnosis of, and possible differentiation from, MS-related or NMOSD-related ON.
- Immunoglobulin A Antibodies Against Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein in a Subgroup of Patients With Central Nervous System Demyelination(2023) GOMES, Ana Beatriz Ayroza Galvao Ribeiro; KULSVEHAGEN, Laila; LIPPS, Patrick; CAGOL, Alessandro; CERDA-FUERTES, Nuria; NEZIRAJ, Tradite; FLAMMER, Julia; LERNER, Jasmine; LECOURT, Anne-Catherine; SIEBENBORN, Nina De Oliveira S.; CORTESE, Rosa; SCHAEDELIN, Sabine; SCHOEPS, Vinicius Andreoli; MATOS, Aline de Moura Brasil; MENDES, Natalia Trombini; PEREIRA, Clarissa dos Reis; MONTEIRO, Mario Luiz Ribeiro; APOSTOLOS-PEREIRA, Samira Luisa dos; SCHINDLER, Patrick; CHIEN, Claudia; SCHWAKE, Carolin; SCHNEIDER, Ruth; PAKEERATHAN, Thivya; AKTAS, Orhan; FISCHER, Urs; MEHLING, Matthias; DERFUSS, Tobias; KAPPOS, Ludwig; AYZENBERG, Ilya; RINGELSTEIN, Marius; PAUL, Friedemann; CALLEGARO, Dagoberto; KUHLE, Jens; PAPADOPOULOU, Athina; GRANZIERA, Cristina; PROBSTEL, Anne-KatrinIMPORTANCE Differential diagnosis of patients with seronegative demyelinating central nervous system (CNS) disease is challenging. In this regard, evidence suggests that immunoglobulin (Ig) A plays a role in the pathogenesis of different autoimmune diseases. Yet little is known about the presence and clinical relevance of IgA antibodies against myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) in CNS demyelination. OBJECTIVE To investigate the frequency of MOG-IgA and associated clinical features in patients with demyelinating CNS disease and healthy controls. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This longitudinal study comprised 1 discovery and 1 confirmation cohort derived from 5 centers. Participants included patients with suspected or confirmed demyelinating diseases and healthy controls. MOG-IgA, MOG-IgG, and MOG-IgM were measured in serum samples and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients, who were assessed from September 2012 to April 2022. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Frequency and clinical features of patients who were seropositive for MOG-IgA and double-seronegative for aquaporin 4 (AQP4) IgG and MOG-IgG. RESULTS After the exclusion of 5 participants with coexisting AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgA, MOG-IgG, and/or MOG-IgM, 1339 patients and 110 healthy controls were included; the median follow-up time was 39 months (range, 0-227 months). Of included patients with isolated MOG-IgA, 11 of 18 were female (61%), and the median age was 31.5 years (range, 3-76 years). Among patients double-seronegative for AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgG (1126/1339; 84%), isolated MOG-IgA was identified in 3 of 50 patients (6%) with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, 5 of 228 patients (2%) with other CNS demyelinating diseases, and 10 of 848 patients (1%) with multiple sclerosis but in none of the healthy controls (0/110). The most common disease manifestation in patients seropositive for isolated MOG-IgA was myelitis (11/17 [65%]), followed by more frequent brainstem syndrome (7/16 [44%] vs 14/75 [19%], respectively; P =.048), and infrequent manifestation of optic neuritis (4/15 [27%] vs 46/73 [63%], respectively; P =.02) vs patients with MOG-IgG. Among patients fulfilling 2017 McDonald criteria for multiple sclerosis, MOG-IgA was associated with less frequent CSF-specific oligoclonal bands (4/9 [44%] vs 325/351 [93%], respectively; P <.001) vs patients with multiple sclerosis who were MOG-IgG/IgA seronegative. Further, most patients with isolated MOG-IgA presented clinical attacks after recent infection or vaccination (7/11 [64%]). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE In this study, MOG-specific IgA was identified in a subgroup of patients who were double-seronegative for AQP4-/MOG-IgG, suggesting that MOG-IgA may be a novel diagnostic biomarker for patients with CNS demyelination.
- Estimated prevalence of AQP4 positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and MOG antibody associated disease in Sa tilde o Paulo, Brazil(2023) SILVA, Guilherme Diogo; APOSTOLOS-PEREIRA, Samira Luisa; CALLEGARO, DagobertoBackground: Numerous studies addressed the prevalence of multiple sclerosis, but prevalence studies of NMOSD and, particularly, MOGAD are scarce. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of NMOSD and MOGAD in the city of Sa tilde o Paulo, based on the known prevalence of MS.Methods: In this observational study, we determined the total number of patients with central nervous system demyelinating disease on regular follow-up in a university referral center in Sa tilde o Paulo, from May 2019 to May 2021 according to the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS), NMOSD and MOGAD using the current diagnostic criteria for these diseases. We used the MS: NMOSD and MS: MOGAD ratios to estimate the ratio of these diseases in Sa tilde o Paulo, Brazil.Results: We identified 968 patients with MS, 133 patients with AQP4 positive NMOSD, and 28 patients with MOGAD. We found the MS: NMOSD ratio of 7,28 and the MS: MOGAD ratio of 34,57. We estimated a prevalence of 2,1 per 100,000 inhabitants for NMOSD and of 0,4 per 100,000 inhabitants for MOGAD.Conclusion: The prevalence of NMOSD is high in Sa tilde o Paulo, but the prevalence of MOGAD is low when compared with the prevalence found in most of the studies reported to date.
- Cost, efficacy, and safety comparison between early intensive and escalating strategies for multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis(2023) PIPEK, Leonardo Zumerkorn; MAHLER, Joao Vitor; NASCIMENTO, Rafaela Farias Vidigal; APOSTOLOS-PEREIRA, Samira Luisa; SILVA, Guilherme Diogo; CALLEGARO, DagobertoBackground: The optimal treatment strategy of multiple sclerosis (MS) is a matter of debate. The classical approach is the escalating (ESC) strategy, which consists of starting with low-to moderate-efficacy disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) and upscale to high-efficacy DMDs when noting some evidence of active disease. Another approach, the early intensive (EIT) strategy, is starting with high-efficiency DMDs as first-line therapy. Our goal was to compare effectiveness, safety, and cost of ESC and EIT strategies.Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and SCOPUS until September 2022, for studies comparing EIT and ESC strategies in adult participants with relapsing-remitting MS and a minimum follow-up of 5 years. We examined the Expanded Disability Severity Scale (EDSS), the proportion of severe adverse events, and cost in a 5-year period. Random-effects meta-analysis summarized the efficacy and safety and an EDSS-based Markov model estimated the cost.Results: Seven studies with 3,467 participants showed a 30% reduction in EDSS worsening in 5 years (RR 0.7; [0.59-0.83]; p < 0.001) in the EIT group vs in the ESC group. Two studies with 1,118 participants suggested a similar safety profile for these strategies (RR 1.92; [0.38-9.72]; p = 0.4324). EIT with natalizumab in extended interval dosing, rituximab, alemtuzumab, and cladribine demonstrated cost-effectiveness in our model.Discussion: EIT presents higher efficacy in preventing disability progression, a similar safety profile, and can be cost-effective within a 5-year timeline.
- Misdiagnosis in multiple sclerosis in a Brazilian reference center: Clinical, radiological, laboratory profile and failures in the diagnostic process-Cohort study(2023) TIEPPO, Eduardo Macedo de Souza; SILVA, Guilherme Diogo; SILVA, Tomas Fraga Ferreira da; ARAUJO, Roger Santana de; OLIVEIRA, Mateus Boaventura de; SPRICIGO, Mariana Gondim Peixoto; PIMENTEL, Gabriela Almeida; CAMPANA, Igor Gusmao; CASTRILLO, Bruno Batitucci; MENDES, Natalia Trombini; TEIXEIRA, Larissa Silva; NUNES, Douglas Mendes; RIMKUS, Carolina de Medeiros; ADONI, Tarso; PEREIRA, Samira Luisa Apostolos; CALLEGARO, DagobertoBackground: Multiple sclerosis misdiagnosis remains a problem despite the well-validated McDonald 2017. For proper evaluation of errors in the diagnostic process that lead to misdiagnosis, it is adequate to incorporate patients who are already under regular follow-up at reference centers of demyelinating diseases. Objectives: To evaluate multiple sclerosis misdiagnosis in patients who are on follow-up at a reference center of demyelinating diseases in Brazil. Methods: We designed an observational study including patients in regular follow-up, who were diagnosed with multiple sclerosis at our specialized outpatient clinic in the Hospital of Clinics in the University of Sao Paulo, from 1996 to 2021, and were reassessed for misdiagnosis in 2022. We evaluated demographic information, clinical profile, and complementary exams and classified participants as ""established multiple sclerosis,"" ""non-multiple sclerosis, diagnosed,"" and ""non-multiple sclerosis, undiagnosed."" Failures in the diagnostic process were assessed by the modified Diagnostic Error Evaluation and Research tool. Results: A total of 201 patients were included. After analysis, 191/201 (95.02%) participants were confirmed as ""established multiple sclerosis,"" 5/201 (2.49%) were defined as ""non-multiple sclerosis, diagnosed,"" and 5/201 (2.49%) were defined as ""non-multiple sclerosis, undiagnosed."" Conclusions: Multiple sclerosis misdiagnosis persists in reference centers, emphasizing the need for careful interpretation of clinical findings to prevent errors.