LETICIA LEONE LAURICELLA

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
6
Lattes
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
LIM/61 - Laboratório de Pesquisa em Cirurgia Torácica, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina

Filtros

Limpar filtros

Configurações

Indexador: PubMed ×

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
  • article 11 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    A Brazilian randomized study: Robotic-Assisted vs. Video-assisted lung lobectomy Outcomes (BRAVO trial)
    (2022) TERRA, Ricardo Mingarini; ARAUJO, Pedro Henrique Xavier Nabuco de; LAURICELLA, Leticia Leone; CAMPOS, Jose Ribas Milanese de; TRINDADE, Juliana Rocha Mol; PEGO-FERNANDES, Paulo Manuel
    Objective: To compare 90-day morbidity in patients undergoing lung lobectomy performed by either robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) or video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). Intraoperative complications, drainage time, length of hospital stay, postoperative pain, postoperative quality of life, and readmissions within 90 days were also compared. Methods: This was a two-arm randomized clinical trial including patients with lung lesions (primary lung cancer or lung metastasis) who were candidates for lung lobectomy. Patients with comorbidities that precluded surgical treatment were excluded. All patients followed the same postoperative protocol. Results: The overall sample comprised 76 patients (39 in the VATS group and 37 in the RATS group). The two groups were similar regarding gender, age, BMI, FEV1 in % of predicted, and comorbidities. Postoperative complications within 90 days tended to be more common in the VATS group than in the RATS group, but the difference was not significant (p = 0.12). However, when only major complications were analyzed, this tendency disappeared (p = 0.58). Regarding postoperative outcomes, the VATS group had a significantly higher number of readmissions within 90 days than did the RATS group (p = 0.029). No significant differences were found regarding intraoperative complications, drainage time, length of hospital stay, postoperative pain, and postoperative quality of life. Conclusions: RATS and VATS lobectomy had similar 90-day outcomes. However, RATS lobectomy was associated with a significant reduction in the 90-day hospital readmission rate. Larger studies are necessary to confirm such a finding.