PAULO SAKAI
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Faculdade de Medicina - Docente
Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
LIM/35 - Laboratório de Nutrição e Cirurgia Metabólica do Aparelho Digestivo, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
LIM/35 - Laboratório de Nutrição e Cirurgia Metabólica do Aparelho Digestivo, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
19 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 10 de 19
- Endoscopic polymer injection and endoluminal plication in treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: evaluation of long-term results(2018) MOURA, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux De; SAIIUM, Rubens A. A.; NASI, Ary; CORONEL, Martin; MOURA, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux De; MOURA, Eduardo Turiani Hourneaux De; MINATA, Mauricio Kazuyoshi; CURY, Marcelo; FALCAO, Angela; CECCONELLO, Ivan; SAKAI, PauloBackground and study aims Us of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has made endoscopic treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) more efficient, with reduction in morbidity and complications. However, some patients persist with symptoms despite medical treatment and some are not compliant with it or cannot afford it for financial reasons, and thus they require non-pharmacological therapeutic options such as surgical fundoplication. Surgery may be effective in the short term, but there is related morbidity and concern about its long-term efficacy. The possibility of minimally invasive endoluminal surgeries has resulted in interest in and development of newly endoscopic devices. Good short-term results with surgical fundoplication lack of studies of is with long follow-up justify our interest in this study. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of endoscopic polymer injection and endoluminal full-thickness plication in the long-term control of GERD. Patients and methods Forty-seven patients with GERD who underwent an endoscopic procedure were followed up for 60 months and evaluated for total response (RT), partial response (RP) and no response (SR) to endoscopic treatment with reintroduction of PPIs. Results Twenty-one patients received polymer injection (G0) and 26 endoluminal plication (G1). The number of patients with no response to endoscopic treatment with reintroduction of PPIs increased in time for both techniques (G0 P = 0.006; G1 P < 0.001). There was symptomatic improvement up to 12 months, with progressive loss of this trending up to 60 months in G0 and G1 (P < 0.001). Health-related quality of life score (GERD-HRQL) demonstrated TR in G0 and G1 at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. The 60-month analysis showed an increased number of patients with SR in both groups. The quality of life assessment (SF-36) showed benefit in G0 up to 3 months. G0 showed a higher rate of complications. There were no deaths. There was healing of esophagitis at 3 months in 45 % of patients in G0 and 40 % in G1. There was no improvement in manometric or pH findings. Conclusion Endoscopic therapies were ineffective in controlling GERD in the long term.
conferenceObject Traditional forward view versus wide view technology: polyp and adenoma detection rate in colonoscopy(2016) ROCHA, Rodrigo S.; KORKISCHKO, Nadia; SILVA, Gustavo L.; AQUINO, Julio Cesar M.; MORITA, Flavio H.; MOURA, Eduardo T. de; MOURA, Diogo T. de; OLIVEIRA, Joel; MENDONCA, Ernesto Q.; BRAVO, Jose G.; BARACAT, Felipe I.; SAKAI, Paulo; MOURA, Eduardo G. de- Percutaneous endoscopic versus surgical gastrostomy in patients with benign and malignant diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis(2016) BRAVO, Jose Goncalves Pereira; IDE, Edson; KONDO, Andre; MOURA, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de; MOURA, Eduardo Turiani Hourneaux de; SAKAI, Paulo; BERNARDO, Wanderley Marques; MOURA, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux deTo compare the complications and mortality related to gastrostomy procedures performed using surgical and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy techniques, this review covered seven studies. Five of these were retrospective and two were randomized prospective studies. In total, 406 patients were involved, 232 of whom had undergone percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and 174 of whom had undergone surgical gastrostomy. The analysis was performed using Review Manager. Risk differences were computed using a fixed-effects model and forest and funnel plots. Data on risk differences and 95% confidence intervals were obtained using the Mantel-Haenszel test. There was no difference in major complications in retrospective (95% CI (-0.11 to 0.10)) or randomized (95% CI (-0.07 to 0.05)) studies. Regarding minor complications, no difference was found in retrospective studies (95% CI (-00.17 to 0.09)), whereas a difference was observed in randomized studies (95% CI (-0.25 to -0.02)). Separate analyses of retrospective and randomized studies revealed no differences between the methods in relation to mortality and major complications. Moreover, low levels of minor complications were observed among endoscopic procedures in randomized studies, with no difference observed compared with retrospective studies.
- PREDICTORS OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX AFTER POEM FOR ACHALASIA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS(2019) MOTA, Raquel Cristina L.; MOURA, Eduardo G. de; MOURA, Diogo T. de; MOURA, Eduardo T.; FARIAS, Galileu F.; BRUNALDI, Vitor O.; BERNARDO, Wanderlei M.; SAKAI, Paulo; THOMPSON, Christopher C.
- Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs versus placebo for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis(2019) SERRANO, Juan Pablo Roman; MOURA, Diogoturiani Hourneaux de; BERNARDO, Wanderley Marques; RIBEIRO, Igor Braga; FRANZINI, Tomazo Prince; MOURA, Eduardo Turiani Hourneaux de; BRUNALDI, Vitor Ottoboni; SALESSE, Marianne Torrezan; SAKAI, Paulo; MOURA, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux DeBackground and study aims Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the primary therapeutic procedure for treatment of diseases that affect the biliary tree and pancreatic duct. While the therapeutic success rate of ERCP is high, the procedure can cause complications, such as acute pancreatitis (PEP), bleeding, and perforation. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in preventing PEP following (ERCP). Materials and methods We searched databases, such as MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Library. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy of NSAIDs and placebo for the prevention of PEP were included. Outcomes assessed included incidence of PEP, severity of pancreatitis, route of administration, and type of NSAIDs. Results Twenty-one RCTs were considered eligible with a total of 6854 patients analyzed. Overall, 3427 patients used NSAIDs before ERCP and 3427 did not use the drugs (control group). In the end, 250 cases of acute pancreatitis post-ERCP were diagnosed in the NSAIDs group and 407 cases in the placebo group. Risk for PEP was lower in the NSAID group (risk difference (RD): -0.05; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.07 to -0.03; number need to treat (NNT), 20; P<0.05). Use of NSAIDs effectively prevented mild pancreatitis compared with use of placebo (2.5% vs. 4.1%; 95% CI, -0.05 to -0.01; NNT, 33; P<0.05), but the information on moderate and severe PEP could not be completely elucidated. Only rectal administration reduced incidence of PEP (6.8% vs. 13 %; 95% CI, -0.10 to -0.04; NNT, 20; P<0.05). Furthermore, only diclofenac or indomethacin use was effective in preventing PEP. Conclusions Rectal administration of diclofenac and indomethacin significantly reduced risk of developing mild PEP. Further RCTs are needed to compare efficacy between NSAID administration pathways in prevention of PEP after ERCP.
- GASTRIC PERORAL ENDOSCOPIC MYOTOMY (G-POEM) IN THE TREATMENT OF REFRACTORY GASTROPARESIS: CASE SERIES AND LITERATURE REVIEW(2019) PONTE, Alberto M. da; SAGAE, Vitor M.; MORITA, Flavio H.; MATSUBAYASHI, Carolina O.; MINATA, Mauricio K.; MOURA, Eduardo T.; SAKAI, Paulo; MOURA, Eduardo G. de; CHAVES, Dalton
conferenceObject Biliary Stenosis Extreme Endoscopy Treatment - Very Large Balloon Dilation: Case Series (EBD)(2016) MOURA, Eduardo T. de; SILVA, Gustavo L.; PASSOS, Marina Lordello; AQUINO, Julio Cesar M.; CASTRO, Vinicius L.; MOURA, Diogo T. de; FRANZINI, Tomazo; SAKAI, Paulo- Peroral endoscopic myotomy vs laparoscopic myotomy and partial fundoplication for esophageal achalasia: A single-center randomized controlled trial(2022) MOURA, Eduardo Turiani Hourneaux de; JUKEMURA, Jose; RIBEIRO, Igor Braga; FARIAS, Galileu Ferreira Ayala; DELGADO, Aureo Augusto de Almeida; COUTINHO, Lara Meireles Azeredo; MOURA, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de; SALLUM, Rubens Antonio Aissar; NASI, Ary; SANCHEZ-LUNA, Sergio A.; SAKAI, Paulo; MOURA, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux deBACKGROUND Achalasia is a rare benign esophageal motor disorder characterized by incomplete relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). The treatment of achalasia is not curative, but rather is aimed at reducing LES pressure. In patients who have failed noninvasive therapy, surgery should be considered. Myotomy with partial fundoplication has been considered the first-line treatment for non-advanced achalasia. Recently, peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), a technique that employs the principles of submucosal endoscopy to perform the equivalent of a surgical myotomy, has emerged as a promising minimally invasive technique for the management of this condition. AIM To compare POEM and laparoscopic myotomy and partial fundoplication (LM-PF) regarding their efficacy and outcomes for the treatment of achalasia. METHODS Forty treatment-naive adult patients who had been diagnosed with achalasia based on clinical and manometric criteria (dysphagia score >= II and Eckardt score > 3) were randomized to undergo either LM-PF or POEM. The outcome measures were anesthesia time, procedure time, symptom improvement, reflux esophagitis (as determined with the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire), barium column height at 1 and 5 min (on a barium esophagogram), pressure at the LES, the occurrence of adverse events (AEs), length of stay (LOS), and quality of life (QoL). RESULTS There were no statistically significant differences between the LM-PF and POEM groups regarding symptom improvement at 1, 6, and 12 mo of follow-up (P = 0.192, P = 0.242, and P = 0.242, respectively). However, the rates of reflux esophagitis at 1, 6, and 12 mo of follow-up were significantly higher in the POEM group (P = 0.014, P < 0.001, and P = 0.002, respectively). There were also no statistical differences regarding the manometry values, the occurrence of AEs, or LOS. Anesthesia time and procedure time were significantly shorter in the POEM group than in the LM-PF group (185.00 +/- 56.89 and 95.70 +/- 30.47 min vs 296.75 +/- 56.13 and 218.75 +/- 50.88 min, respectively; P = 0.001 for both). In the POEM group, there were improvements in all domains of the QoL questionnaire, whereas there were improvements in only three domains in the LM-PF group. CONCLUSION POEM and LM-PF appear to be equally effective in controlling the symptoms of achalasia, shortening LOS, and minimizing AEs. Nevertheless, POEM has the advantage of improving all domains of QoL, and shortening anesthesia and procedure times but with a significantly higher rate of gastroesophageal reflux
- Early Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Versus Conservative Treatment in Patients With Acute Biliary Pancreatitis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials(2018) COUTINHO, Lara M. de A.; BERNARDO, Wanderley M.; ROCHA, Rodrigo S.; MARINHO, Fabio R.; DELGADO, Aureo; MOURA, Eduardo T. H.; MATUGUMA, Sergio E.; CHAVES, Dalton; FRANZINI, Tomazo A. P.; SAKAI, Paulo; MOURA, Eduardo G. H. deObjectives The aim of the study was to evaluate the role of early endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis, in comparison with conservative treatment. Methods Systematic review via databases (MEDLINE [PubMed], Latin-American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature database, Embase, Cochrane Central, and the [Brazilian] Regional Library of Medicine) is conducted. We analyzed 10 randomized controlled trials (1091 patients). Outcomes were the following: local and systemic adverse events; acute cholangitis; death; length of hospital stay; cost; abdominal pain; and time to a reduction in body temperature. For the meta-analysis, we used risk difference (RD) and mean with standard deviation as measures of variability. Results There was a statistically significant difference between the patients submitted to ERCP in terms of the following: local adverse events (RD, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55-0.99), time to pain relief and time to a reduction in axillary temperature (RD, -5.01; 95% CI, -6.98 to -3.04, and RD, -1.70; 95 CI%, -2.33 to -1.08, respectively). Patients undergoing ERCP spent less time in hospital (RD, -11.04; 95% CI, -15.15 to -6.93). Cost was lower in the group treated with ERCP. Conclusions Early ERCP decreases local adverse events, shortening the time to pain relief, to a reduction in axillary temperature, hospital stays, and cost in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis.
- Endoscopy vs surgery in the treatment of early gastric cancer: Systematic review(2015) KONDO, Andre; MOURA, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux de; BERNARDO, Wanderley Marques; YAGI, Osmar Kenji; MOURA, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de; MOURA, Eduardo Turiani Hourneaux de; BRAVO, Jose Goncalves Pereira; YAMAZAKI, Kendi; SAKAI, PauloAIM: To report a systematic review, establishing the available data to an unpublished 2a strength of evidence, better handling clinical practice. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, LILACS, Scopus and CINAHL databases. Information of the selected studies was extracted on characteristics of trial participants, inclusion and exclusion criteria, interventions (mainly, mucosal resection and submucosal dissection vs surgical approach) and outcomes (adverse events, different survival rates, mortality, recurrence and complete resection rates). To ascertain the validity of eligible studies, the risk of bias was measured using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. The analysis of the absolute risk of the outcomes was performed using the software RevMan, by computing risk differences (RD) of dichotomous variables. Data on RD and 95% CIs for each outcome were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel test and inconsistency was qualified and reported in. 2 and the Higgins method (I 2). Sensitivity analysis was performed when heterogeneity was higher than 50%, a subsequent assay was done and other findings were compiled. RESULTS: Eleven retrospective cohort studies were selected. The included records involved 2654 patients with early gastric cancer that filled the absolute or expanded indications for endoscopic resection. Three-year survival data were available for six studies (n = 1197). There were no risk differences (RD) after endoscopic and surgical treatment (RD = 0.01, 95% CI: -0.02-0.05, P = 0.51). Five-year survival data (n = 2310) showed no difference between the two groups (RD = 0.01, 95% CI: -0.01-0.03, P = 0.46). Recurrence data were analized in five studies (1331 patients) and there was no difference between the approaches (RD = 0.01, 95% CI: -0.00-0.02, P = 0.09). Adverse event data were identified in eight studies (n = 2439). A significant difference was detected (RD = -0.08, 95% CI: -0.10--0.05, P < 0.05), demonstrating better results with endoscopy. Mortality data were obtained in four studies (n = 1107). There was no difference between the groups (RD = -0.01, 95% CI: -0.02-0.00, P = 0.22). CONCLUSION: Three-, 5-year survival, recurrence and mortality are similar for both groups. Considering complication, endoscopy is better and, analyzing complete resection data, it is worse than surgery.