LEANDRO DA COSTA LANE VALIENGO

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
26
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto de Psiquiatria, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
LIM/27 - Laboratório de Neurociências, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 4 de 4
  • article 0 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Interventional psychiatry: 13 reasons why
    (2022) BRUNONI, Andre R.; VALIENGO, Leandro; GALLUCCI-NETO, Jose
  • article 3 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Symptoms: A Meta-Analysis and Integrated Electric Fields Modeling Analysis
    (2023) PINTO, Bianca Silva; CAVENDISH, Beatriz Araujo; SILVA, Pedro Henrique Rodrigues da; SUEN, Paulo Jeng Chian; MARINHO, Kalian Almeida Pereira; VALIENGO, Leandro da Costa Lane; VANDERHASSELT, Marie-Anne; BRUNONI, Andre Russowsky; RAZZA, Lais Boralli
    Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been showing promising effects for the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), but there is still no conclusion on its efficacy for this disorder. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of trials using tDCS for OCD and a computer modeling analysis to evaluate the electric field (EF) strengths of different electrode assemblies in brain regions of interest (ROIs) (PROSPERO-42021262465). PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to 25 September 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and open-label studies were included. The primary aim was the effect size (Hedges' g) of continuous outcomes and potential moderators of response. For EF modeling, SimNIBS software was used. Four RCTs and four open-label trials were included (n = 241). Results revealed a large effect of tDCS in the endpoint, but no significant effect between active and sham protocols. No predictor of response was found. EF analysis revealed that montages using the main electrode over the (pre)supplementary motor area with an extracephalic reference electrode might lead to stronger EFs in the predefined ROIs. Our results revealed that tDCS might be a promising intervention to treat OCD; however, larger studies are warranted.
  • article 13 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Digitalized transcranial electrical stimulation: A consensus statement
    (2022) BRUNONI, Andre R.; EKHTIARI, Hamed; ANTAL, Andrea; AUVICHAYAPAT, Paradee; BAEKEN, Chris; BENSENOR, Isabela M.; BIKSON, Marom; BOGGIO, Paulo; BORRONI, Barbara; BRIGHINA, Filippo; BRUNELIN, Jerome; CARVALHO, Sandra; CAUMO, Wolnei; CIECHANSKI, Patrick; CHARVET, Leigh; CLARK, Vincent P.; KADOSH, Roi Cohen; COTELLI, Maria; DATTA, Abhishek; DENG, Zhi-De; RAEDT, Rudi De; RIDDER, Dirk De; FITZGERALD, Paul B.; FLOEL, Agnes; FROHLICH, Flavio; GEORGE, Mark S.; GHOBADI-AZBARI, Peyman; GOERIGK, Stephan; HAMILTON, Roy H.; JABERZADEH, Shapour J.; HOY, Kate; KIDGELL, Dawson J.; ZONOOZI, Arash Khojasteh; KIRTON, Adam; LAUREYS, Steven; LAVIDOR, Michal; LEE, Kiwon; LEITE, Jorge; LISANBY, Sarah H.; LOO, Colleen; MARTIN, Donel M.; MINIUSSI, Carlo; MONDINO, Marine; MONTE-SILVA, Katia; MORALES-QUEZADA, Leon; NITSCHE, Michael A.; OKANO, Alexandre H.; OLIVEIRA, Claudia S.; ONARHEIM, Balder; PACHECO-BARRIOS, Kevin; PADBERG, Frank; NAKAMURA-PALACIOS, Ester M.; PALM, Ulrich; PAULUS, Walter; PLEWNIA, Christian; PRIORI, Alberto; RAJJI, Tarek K.; RAZZA, Lais B.; REHN, Erik M.; RUFFINI, Giulio; SCHELLHORN, Klaus; ZARE-BIDOKY, Mehran; SIMIS, Marcel; SKORUPINSKI, Pawel; SUEN, Paulo; THIBAUT, Aurore; VALIENGO, Leandro C. L.; VANDERHASSELT, Marie-Anne; VANNESTE, Sven; VENKATASUBRAMANIAN, Ganesan; VIOLANTE, Ines R.; WEXLER, Anna; WOODS, Adam J.; FREGNI, Felipe
    Objective: Although relatively costly and non-scalable, non-invasive neuromodulation interventions are treatment alternatives for neuropsychiatric disorders. The recent developments of highly-deployable transcranial electric stimulation (tES) systems, combined with mobile-Health technologies, could be incorporated in digital trials to overcome methodological barriers and increase equity of access. The study aims are to discuss the implementation of tES digital trials by performing a systematic scoping review and strategic process mapping, evaluate methodological aspects of tES digital trial designs, and provide Delphi-based recommendations for implementing digital trials using tES. Methods: We convened 61 highly-productive specialists and contacted 8 tES companies to assess 71 issues related to tES digitalization readiness, and processes, barriers, advantages, and opportunities for implementing tES digital trials. Delphi-based recommendations (>60% agreement) were provided. Results: The main strengths/opportunities of tES were: (i) non-pharmacological nature (92% of agreement), safety of these techniques (80%), affordability (88%), and potential scalability (78%). As for weaknesses/threats, we listed insufficient supervision (76%) and unclear regulatory status (69%). Many issues related to methodological biases did not reach consensus. Device appraisal showed moderate digitalization readiness, with high safety and potential for trial implementation, but low connectivity. Conclusions: Panelists recognized the potential of tES for scalability, generalizability, and leverage of digital trials processes; with no consensus about aspects regarding methodological biases. Significance: We further propose and discuss a conceptual framework for exploiting shared aspects between mobile-Health tES technologies with digital trials methodology to drive future efforts for digitizing tES trials.
  • article 28 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Prevalence and risk factors of psychiatric symptoms and diagnoses before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from the ELSA-Brasil COVID-19 mental health cohort
    (2023) BRUNONI, Andre Russowsky; SUEN, Paulo Jeng Chian; BACCHI, Pedro Starzynski; RAZZA, Lais Boralli; KLEIN, Izio; SANTOS, Leonardo Afonso dos; SANTOS, Itamar de Souza; VALIENGO, Leandro da Costa Lane; GALLUCCI-NETO, Jose; MORENO, Marina Lopes; PINTO, Bianca Silva; FELIX, Larissa de Cassia Silva; SOUSA, Juliana Pereira de; VIANA, Maria Carmen; FORTE, Pamela Marques; CARDOSO, Marcia Cristina de Altisent Oliveira; BITTENCOURT, Marcio Sommer; PELOSOF, Rebeca; SIQUEIRA, Luciana Lima de; FATORI, Daniel; BELLINI, Helena; BUENO, Priscila Vilela Silveira; PASSOS, Ives Cavalcante; NUNES, Maria Angelica; SALUM, Giovanni Abrahao; BAUERMEISTER, Sarah; SMOLLER, Jordan W.; LOTUFO, Paulo Andrade; BENSENOR, Isabela Martins
    Background There is mixed evidence on increasing rates of psychiatric disorders and symptoms during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in 2020. We evaluated pandemic-related psychopathology and psychiatry diagnoses and their determinants in the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Health (ELSA-Brasil) Sao Paulo Research Center. Methods Between pre-pandemic ELSA-Brasil assessments in 2008-2010 (wave-1), 2012-2014 (wave-2), 2016-2018 (wave-3) and three pandemic assessments in 2020 (COVID-19 waves in May-July, July-September, and October-December), rates of common psychiatric symptoms, and depressive, anxiety, and common mental disorders (CMDs) were compared using the Clinical Interview Scheduled-Revised (CIS-R) and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21). Multivariable generalized linear models, adjusted by age, gender, educational level, and ethnicity identified variables associated with an elevated risk for mental disorders. Results In 2117 participants (mean age 62.3 years, 58.2% females), rates of CMDs and depressive disorders did not significantly change over time, oscillating from 23.5% to 21.1%, and 3.3% to 2.8%, respectively; whereas rate of anxiety disorders significantly decreased (2008-2010: 13.8%; 2016-2018: 9.8%; 2020: 8%). There was a decrease along three wave-COVID assessments for depression [beta = -0.37, 99.5% confidence interval (CI) -0.50 to -0.23], anxiety (beta = -0.37, 99.5% CI -0.48 to -0.26), and stress (beta = -0.48, 99.5% CI -0.64 to -0.33) symptoms (all ps < 0.001). Younger age, female sex, lower educational level, non-white ethnicity, and previous psychiatric disorders were associated with increased odds for psychiatric disorders, whereas self-evaluated good health and good quality of relationships with decreased risk. Conclusion No consistent evidence of pandemic-related worsening psychopathology in our cohort was found. Indeed, psychiatric symptoms slightly decreased along 2020. Risk factors representing socioeconomic disadvantages were associated with increased odds of psychiatric disorders.