LAURA HELENA SILVEIRA GUERRA DE ANDRADE
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto de Psiquiatria, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
LIM/23 - Laboratório de Psicopatologia e Terapêutica Psiquiátrica, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Líder
LIM/23 - Laboratório de Psicopatologia e Terapêutica Psiquiátrica, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Líder
2 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
- Factors associated with satisfaction and perceived helpfulness of mental healthcare: a World Mental Health Surveys report(2024) HARRIS, Meredith G.; KAZDIN, Alan E.; MUNTHALI, Richard J.; VIGO, Daniel V.; STEIN, Dan J.; VIANA, Maria Carmen; AGUILAR-GAXIOLA, Sergio; AL-HAMZAWI, Ali; ALONSO, Jordi; ANDRADE, Laura Helena; BUNTING, Brendan; CHARDOUL, Stephanie; GUREJE, Oye; HU, Chiyi; HWANG, Irving; KARAM, Elie G.; NAVARRO-MATEU, Fernando; NISHI, Daisuke; OROZCO, Ricardo; SAMPSON, Nancy A.; SCOTT, Kate M.; VLADESCU, Cristian; WOJTYNIAK, Bogdan; XAVIER, Miguel; ZARKOV, Zahari; KESSLER, Ronald C.BackgroundMental health service providers are increasingly interested in patient perspectives. We examined rates and predictors of patient-reported satisfaction and perceived helpfulness in a cross-national general population survey of adults with 12-month DSM-IV disorders who saw a provider for help with their mental health.MethodsData were obtained from epidemiological surveys in the World Mental Health Survey Initiative. Respondents were asked about satisfaction with treatments received from up to 11 different types of providers (very satisfied, satisfied, neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, very dissatisfied) and helpfulness of the provider (a lot, some, a little, not at all). We modelled predictors of satisfaction and helpfulness using a dataset of patient-provider observations (n = 5,248).ResultsMost treatment was provided by general medical providers (37.4%), psychiatrists (18.4%) and psychologists (12.7%). Most patients were satisfied or very satisfied (65.9-87.5%, across provider) and helped a lot or some (64.4-90.3%). Spiritual advisors and healers were most often rated satisfactory and helpful. Social workers in human services settings were rated lowest on both dimensions. Patients also reported comparatively low satisfaction with general medical doctors and psychiatrists/psychologists and found general medical doctors less helpful than other providers. Men and students reported lower levels of satisfaction than women and nonstudents. Respondents with high education reported higher satisfaction and helpfulness than those with lower education. Type of mental disorder was unrelated to satisfaction but in some cases (depression, bipolar spectrum disorder, social phobia) was associated with low perceived helpfulness. Insurance was unrelated to either satisfaction or perceived helpfulness but in some cases was associated with elevated perceived helpfulness for a given level of satisfaction.ConclusionsSatisfaction with and perceived helpfulness of treatment varied as a function of type of provider, service setting, mental status, and socio-demographic variables. Invariably, caution is needed in combining data from multiple countries where there are cultural and service delivery variations. Even so, our findings underscore the utility of patient perspectives in treatment evaluation and may also be relevant in efforts to match patients to treatments.
- The performance of K6 as a screening tool for mood disorders: A population-based study of the Sao Paulo metropolitan area(2024) BRUZEGUINI, Meirielli Vieira; CORASSA, Rafael Bello; WANG, Yuan-Pang; ANDRADE, Laura Helena; SARTI, Thiago Dias; VIANA, Maria CarmenAim: The use of screening instruments allows the detection of psychological and behavioural manifestations there are often not identified in users of health services. We evaluated the performance of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6) in identifying mood disorders (MD), using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) as gold-standard, in a population-based sample (n = 5037) of adult residents of metropolitan Sao Paulo.Methods: Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were calculated to assess the performance of K6 in detecting 30-day CIDI MD. All cut-points for each disorder were analysed using the Youden index and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and the best cut-points were identified. Cronbach's alpha was calculated to assess internal consistency.Results: In total, 5.5% respondents screened positive for any MD (95% IC 4.84-6.14). A good detection performance was observed for all MD, with AUC values for any MD of 0.91 (95% IC 0.89-0.92), ranging from 0.80 (95% CI 0.71-0.98) for minor depression to 0.93 (95% CI 0.87-0.98) for bipolar I disorder. Best cut-points for each MD were identified, with overall sensitivity and specificity of 88.8% and 80.2%, respectively. Cronbach's alpha was 0.83.Conclusions: K6 is a good screening tool for MD in the Brazilian population. It is a brief and easy to use instrument that can promote the early identification and treatment of MD, reducing the burden of mental illness.