Fitness-to-drive after adult civilian traumatic brain injury: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
0
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2023
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
SPRINGER
Autores
FIEDLER, Augusto Mueller
ALMEIDA, Timoteo
VASCONCELLOS, Fernando De Nigris
MORELL, Alexis
CORDEIRO, Joacir Graciolli
Citação
NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, v.46, n.1, article ID 324, 6p, 2023
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) poses significant challenges for assessing fitness-to-drive (FTD) and determining the appropriate timing for return-to-driving (RTD) in civilian adults. This systematic review and meta-analysis protocol is designed to offer a comprehensive assessment of RTD timelines post-TBI, examining the effects of injury severity as well as demographic and clinical factors that influence driving capabilities. In response to gaps identified in previous literature-namely, the absence of recent systematic search strategies and thorough quality assessments-this study employs rigorous methodologies for literature search, data extraction, and evaluation of study quality. Our approach aims to provide reliable estimates and detailed analyses of subgroups within the TBI population. The findings aim to support clinical decision-making, inform RTD readiness, and potentially impact policy and driving assessment protocols. Ultimately, this review seeks to contribute to public safety measures, reduce traffic-related harm, and improve life outcomes for individuals recovering from TBI, thereby filling a vital research niche in neurotrauma rehabilitation.
Palavras-chave
Traumatic brain injury, Fitness-to-drive, Return-to-driving, Systematic review, Meta-analysis, Protocol
Referências
  1. Alhashmi D, 2023, FRONT REHABIL SCI, V3, DOI 10.3389/fresc.2022.1020420
  2. Dams-O'Connor K, 2023, LANCET NEUROL, V22, P517, DOI 10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00065-0
  3. Dawson J, 2023, J HEAD TRAUMA REHAB, V38, P277, DOI 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000849
  4. Downs SH, 1998, J EPIDEMIOL COMMUN H, V52, P377, DOI 10.1136/jech.52.6.377
  5. Egeto P, 2019, J INT NEUROPSYCH SOC, V25, P868, DOI 10.1017/S1355617719000456
  6. Guyatt GH, 2008, BRIT MED J, V336, P924, DOI 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD
  7. McGowan J, 2016, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V75, P40, DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021
  8. Moher D, 2010, INT J SURG, V8, P336, DOI [10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.07.299, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097, 10.1136/bmj.b2700, 10.1136/bmj.i4086, 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1, 10.1136/bmj.b2535]
  9. Page MJ, 2022, REV PANAM SALUD PUBL, V46, DOI [10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4, 10.26633/RPSP.2022.112, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003583, 10.1016/j.rec.2021.07.010, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906, 10.1136/bmj.n71]
  10. Palubiski Lisa, 2016, Geriatrics (Basel), V1, DOI 10.3390/geriatrics1030017
  11. Rauchman SH, 2023, FRONT NEUROSCI-SWITZ, V17, DOI 10.3389/fnins.2023.1090672
  12. Reitz SM, 2020, AM J OCCUP THER, V74, DOI 10.5014/ajot.2020.743003
  13. Rivara FP, 2022, J NEUROTRAUM, DOI 10.1089/neu.2022.0308