Diameter of ureteral access sheath and ureteral stenosis development: a systematic review

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
0
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2023
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ACTA CIRURGICA BRASILEIRA
Citação
ACTA CIRURGICA BRASILEIRA, v.38, article ID e387423, 6p, 2023
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Purpose: Ureteral access sheaths (UAS) are widely used in ureteroscopy. UAS are believed to pose a significant risk for ureteral stenosis due to ureteral mucosal compression, but little evidence supports this claim. Our systematic review aimed to investigate the relationship between different UAS diameters and stenosis risk. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane, from its inception to May 2023. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Cochrane guidelines were followed. chi 2 test was performed to compare the prevalence within the groups. Results: Six nonrandomized trials and one randomized, with a total of 962 patients, were included. The overall incidence of ureteral stenosis of 0.9%. UAS sizes were: 9.5/11.5Fr, 10/12Fr, 11/13Fr, 12/14Fr, and 14/16Fr. Within each subgroup, the incidence of ureteral stenosis was: 0.4, 8, 0, 1, and 1% (p = 0.099). No trend for stenosis was observed among larger UAS. Conclusion: In this systematic review, no relationship between UAS diameter and incidence of ureteral stenosis was observed. Nonetheless, additional randomized controlled trials are required to support this finding.
Palavras-chave
Constriction, Ureteral Calculi, Ureteroscopy
Referências
  1. Aykanat C, 2022, J ENDOUROL, V36, P1013, DOI 10.1089/end.2021.0751
  2. Breen K, 2021, J Endourol, V35, pA102
  3. Delvecchio FC, 2003, UROLOGY, V61, P518, DOI 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)02433-0
  4. Jordan B, 2017, J UROLOGY, V197, pE918, DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.2318
  5. Rodrigues JECM, 2019, J UROLOGY, V201, pE255
  6. Shvero A, 2019, BMC UROL, V19, DOI 10.1186/s12894-019-0509-x
  7. Stern KL, 2019, UROLOGY, V128, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.urology.2019.02.032
  8. Tracy CR, 2018, WORLD J UROL, V36, P971, DOI 10.1007/s00345-018-2204-z
  9. Wong VKF, 2020, INVESTIG CLIN UROL, V61, P455, DOI 10.4111/icu.20200278