Central pain due to stroke: cognitive representation and coping according to gender

dc.contributorSistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP
dc.contributor.authorNOGUEIRA, Mariana
dc.contributor.authorTEIXEIRA, Manoel Jacobsen
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-30T15:08:21Z
dc.date.available2013-07-30T15:08:21Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.description.abstractObjective: To identify and compare perceptions of pain and how it is faced between men and women with central post-stroke pain. Methods: The participants were 25 men and 25 women of minimum age 30 years-old and minimum schooling level of four years, presenting central post-stroke pain for at least three months. The instruments used were: Mini-Mental State Examination; structured interview for the Brief Psychiatric Scale; Survey of Sociodemographic and Clinical Data; Visual Analogue Scale (VAS); Ways of Coping with Problems Scale (WCPS) in Scale; Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R); and Beck Depression Inventory (BD). Results: A significantly greater number of women used the coping strategy ""Turn to spiritual and religious activities"" in WCPS. They associated their emotional state with the cause of pain in IPQ-R. ""Distraction of attention"" was the strategy most used by the subjects. Conclusion: Women used spiritual and religious activities more as a coping strategy and perceived their emotional state as the cause of pain.
dc.description.abstractOBJETIVO: Identificar e comparar a percepção e o enfrentamento da dor entre homens e mulheres com dor central por acidente vascular cerebral (AVC). MÉTODOS: Participaram do estudo 25 homens e 25 mulheres com dor central por AVC há pelo menos três meses, maiores de 30 anos, escolaridade mínima de 4ª série. Os instrumentos utilizados foram: Mini-exame do Estado Mental; Entrevista Estruturada para Escala Psiquiátrica Breve; Inquérito de Dados Sociodemográficos e Clínicos; Escala Visual Analógica (EVA); Escala dos Modos de Enfrentamento de Problemas (EMEP); Questionário de Percepção da Doença Revisado (QPD-R) e Inventário de Depressão de Beck (IDB). RESULTADOS: Um número significativamente maior de mulheres revelou usar a estratégia de enfrentamento "Realizar atividades espirituais e religiosas" na EMEP e associou o estado emocional à causa de suas dores no QPD-R. "Distração da atenção" foi a estratégia mais utilizada pelos sujeitos. CONCLUSÃO: As mulheres utilizaram mais atividades espirituais e religiosas como estratégia de enfrentamento e perceberam mais o estado emocional como causa da dor.
dc.description.indexMEDLINE
dc.description.sponsorshipFundacao de Ampere a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo FAPESP, Brazil
dc.identifier.citationARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA, v.70, n.2, p.125-128, 2012
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/S0004-282X2012000200010
dc.identifier.issn0004-282X
dc.identifier.urihttps://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/779
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherASSOC ARQUIVOS NEURO- PSIQUIATRIA
dc.relation.ispartofArquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.holderCopyright ASSOC ARQUIVOS NEURO- PSIQUIATRIA
dc.subjectcentral pain
dc.subjectgender identity
dc.subjectcognition
dc.subjectstroke
dc.subjectdor central
dc.subjectidentidade de gênero
dc.subjectcognição
dc.subjectacidente vascular cerebral
dc.subject.othermini-mental-state
dc.subject.otherperception questionnaire
dc.subject.otherdepression
dc.subject.otherinventory
dc.subject.otherillness
dc.subject.wosNeurosciences
dc.subject.wosPsychiatry
dc.titleCentral pain due to stroke: cognitive representation and coping according to gender
dc.title.alternativeDor central em acidente vascular encefálico: representação cognitiva e enfrentamento conforme o gênero
dc.typearticle
dc.type.categoryoriginal article
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublication
hcfmusp.citation.scopus7
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcMARIANA NOGUEIRA
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcMANOEL JACOBSEN TEIXEIRA
hcfmusp.description.beginpage125
hcfmusp.description.endpage128
hcfmusp.description.issue2
hcfmusp.description.volume70
hcfmusp.lim.ref2012
hcfmusp.origemWOS
hcfmusp.origem.pubmed22311217
hcfmusp.origem.scieloSCIELO:S0004-282X2012000200010
hcfmusp.origem.scopus2-s2.0-84856897226
hcfmusp.origem.wosWOS:000300650300010
hcfmusp.publisher.citySAO PAULO SP
hcfmusp.publisher.countryBRAZIL
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAffleck G, 1999, PAIN, V83, P601, DOI 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00167-0
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBECK AT, 1961, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V4, P561
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBERTOLUCCI PHF, 1994, ARQ NEURO-PSIQUIAT, V52, P1
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCrippa JAS, 1999, ESCALAS AVALIACAO CL, P207
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFigueiredo W., 2005, Ciencia & Saude Coletiva, V10, P105, DOI 10.1590/S1413-81232005000100017
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFillingim RB, 2003, REHABIL PSYCHOL, V48, P165, DOI 10.1037/0090-5550.48.3.165
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFOLSTEIN MF, 1975, J PSYCHIAT RES, V12, P189, DOI 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGimenes MGG, 1997, MULHER CANC, P171
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGorenstein C, 1996, BRAZ J MED BIOL RES, V29, P453
hcfmusp.relation.referenceJensen IB, 2001, PAIN, V91, P65, DOI 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00420-6
hcfmusp.relation.referenceJENSEN MP, 1992, CLIN J PAIN, V8, P123, DOI 10.1097/00002508-199206000-00010
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLazarus R. S., 1984, STRESS APPRAISAL COP
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMcCaul CH, 1982, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V43, P154
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMerskey H, 1994, CLASSIFICATION CHRON
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMoss-Morris R, 2002, PSYCHOL HEALTH, V17, P1, DOI 10.1080/08870440290001494
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMyers CD, 2003, CLIN J PAIN, V19, P225, DOI 10.1097/00002508-200307000-00005
hcfmusp.relation.referenceNeri CM, 2005, ETICA CATOLICA ESPIR
hcfmusp.relation.referenceNogueira M, 2008, DOR, V9, P1242
hcfmusp.relation.referenceOliveira RAA, 2001, THESIS U SAO PAULO S
hcfmusp.relation.referencePortnoi AG, 2003, DOR CONTEXTO INTERDI, P205
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRHOADES HM, 1988, PSYCHOPHARMACOL BULL, V24, P101
hcfmusp.relation.referenceUnruh AM, 1996, PAIN, V65, P123, DOI 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00214-6
hcfmusp.relation.referenceUnruh AM, 1999, CLIN J PAIN, V15, P31, DOI 10.1097/00002508-199903000-00006
hcfmusp.relation.referenceVITALIANO PP, 1985, MULTIVAR BEHAV RES, V20, P3, DOI 10.1207/s15327906mbr2001_1
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWeinman J, 1996, PSYCHOL HEALTH, V11, P431, DOI 10.1080/08870449608400270
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWidar M, 2004, J PAIN SYMPTOM MANAG, V27, P215, DOI 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2003.07.006
hcfmusp.remissive.sponsorshipFAPESP
hcfmusp.scopus.lastupdate2024-05-17
relation.isAuthorOfPublication2ffdd21b-f894-4c4d-8aaa-55e4bb43de42
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb665cf91-624e-4b90-92bc-9df755eeeaaf
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery2ffdd21b-f894-4c4d-8aaa-55e4bb43de42
Arquivos
Pacote Original
Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
art_NOGUEIRA_Central_pain_due_to_stroke_cognitive_representation_and_2012.PDF
Tamanho:
119.85 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição:
publishedVersion (English)