Expert Consensus on the Use of a New Bioengineered, Cell-Friendly, Smooth Surface Breast Implant
dc.contributor | Sistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP | |
dc.contributor.author | SFORZA, Marcos | |
dc.contributor.author | HAMMOND, Dennis C. | |
dc.contributor.author | BOTTI, Giovanni | |
dc.contributor.author | HEDEN, Per | |
dc.contributor.author | QUIROS, Manuel Chacon | |
dc.contributor.author | MUNHOZ, Alexandre Mendonca | |
dc.contributor.author | KINNEY, Brian M. | |
dc.contributor.author | CORDUFF, Niamh | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-05-30T13:42:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-05-30T13:42:43Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background Although general guidelines are available for established silicone gel breast implants, the unique characteristics of the latest Motiva implants warrant specific guidelines. Objectives This study aimed to generate consensus recommendations and summarize expert-based advice to better understand current surgical practices and to establish guidelines for surgeons transitioning from other implant devices to the Motiva implants. Methods A survey was compiled by 12 plastic surgeon experts in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery and 1 biotechnology scientist, and distributed to 36 plastic surgeons to establish a consensus on the use of these devices. Surgical techniques, complication rates, and implant selection were among the topics discussed. Results The experts agreed on 3 core principles regarding the use of Motiva Round and Ergonomix implants. Firstly, the dissected pocket needs to be close fitting and steps must be taken to prevent expansion of the pocket. Secondly, implant selection must be individualized. Finally, surgical planning and technique must be carefully considered. When questioned about problems they had ecountered, 84.6% of the experts agreed that they experienced fewer overall complications and 76.9% confirmed reduced capsular contracture rates with these devices. Overall, 84.6% of the experts favored selecting Motiva Ergonomix implants over Round implants to achieve a more natural look. In addition, 92.3% of the experts agreed that Motiva implants, due to their innovative technology, reduce the risk of anaplastic large-cell lymphoma. Conclusions This international consensus of leading practitioners will assist plastic surgeons with patient selection, preoperative planning, and surgical technique. These recommendations are designed to optimize surgical outcomes, resulting in lower overall complication rates, more natural-looking breasts, and highly satisfied patients. | eng |
dc.description.index | MEDLINE | eng |
dc.description.sponsorship | Establishment Labs (Alajuela, Costa Rica) | |
dc.identifier.citation | AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, v.39, suppl.3, p.S95-S102, 2019 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/asj/sjz054 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1527-330X | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1090-820X | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/31875 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC | eng |
dc.relation.ispartof | Aesthetic Surgery Journal | |
dc.rights | restrictedAccess | eng |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC | eng |
dc.subject.wos | Surgery | eng |
dc.title | Expert Consensus on the Use of a New Bioengineered, Cell-Friendly, Smooth Surface Breast Implant | eng |
dc.type | article | eng |
dc.type.category | original article | eng |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | eng |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
hcfmusp.affiliation.country | Inglaterra | |
hcfmusp.affiliation.country | Estados Unidos | |
hcfmusp.affiliation.countryiso | gb | |
hcfmusp.affiliation.countryiso | us | |
hcfmusp.author.external | SFORZA, Marcos:Dolan Pk Hosp, Plast Surg, Bromsgrove, England; Royal Coll Surgeons England, London, England | |
hcfmusp.author.external | HAMMOND, Dennis C.:Michigan State Univ, Spectrum Hlth, Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Plast Surg, Grand Rapids, MI USA | |
hcfmusp.author.external | KINNEY, Brian M.:Univ Southern Calif, Div Plast Surg, Keck Sch Med, Beverly Hills, CA USA | |
hcfmusp.citation.scopus | 42 | |
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphc | ALEXANDRE MENDONCA MUNHOZ | |
hcfmusp.description.beginpage | S95 | |
hcfmusp.description.endpage | S102 | |
hcfmusp.description.issue | suppl 3 | |
hcfmusp.description.volume | 39 | |
hcfmusp.origem | WOS | |
hcfmusp.origem.pubmed | 30958549 | |
hcfmusp.origem.scopus | 2-s2.0-85064489263 | |
hcfmusp.origem.wos | WOS:000466714800001 | |
hcfmusp.publisher.city | CARY | eng |
hcfmusp.publisher.country | USA | eng |
hcfmusp.relation.reference | Quiros MC, 2019, AESTHET SURG J, V39, P495, DOI 10.1093/asj/sjy196 | eng |
hcfmusp.relation.reference | Dolores W, 2004, J AUTOIMMUN, V23, P81, DOI 10.1016/j.jaut.2004.03.005 | eng |
hcfmusp.relation.reference | James GA, 2019, AESTHET PLAST SURG, V43, P490, DOI 10.1007/s00266-018-1234-7 | eng |
hcfmusp.relation.reference | Jones P, 2018, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V142, P837, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004801 | eng |
hcfmusp.relation.reference | Kadin ME, 2017, BLOOD, V130 | eng |
hcfmusp.relation.reference | Leberfinger AN, 2017, JAMA SURG, V152, P1161, DOI 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.4026 | eng |
hcfmusp.relation.reference | Loch-Wilkinson A, 2017, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V140, P645, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003654 | eng |
hcfmusp.relation.reference | Maxwell GP, 2017, GLAND SURG, V6, P148, DOI 10.21037/gs.2016.11.09 | eng |
hcfmusp.relation.reference | Munhoz AM, 2017, CASE REP PLAST SURG, V4, P99, DOI 10.1080/23320885.2017.1407658 | eng |
hcfmusp.relation.reference | Sforza M, 2016, J SURG OPEN ACCESS, V2, DOI [10.16966/2470-0991.e107, DOI 10.16966/2470-0991.E107] | eng |
hcfmusp.relation.reference | Sforza M., 2018, J SURG OPEN ACCESS, V4, DOI [10.16966/2470-0991.176, DOI 10.16966/2470-0991.176] | eng |
hcfmusp.relation.reference | Sforza M, 2018, AESTHET SURG J, V38, pS62, DOI 10.1093/asj/sjx150 | eng |
hcfmusp.relation.reference | Sforza M, 2016, AESTHET SURG J, V36, P886, DOI 10.1093/asj/sjw060 | eng |
hcfmusp.scopus.lastupdate | 2024-05-10 | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 6f507ada-b0be-4c50-bd94-1f0116c9184c | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 6f507ada-b0be-4c50-bd94-1f0116c9184c |
Arquivos
Pacote Original
1 - 1 de 1
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
- Nome:
- art_SFORZA_Expert_Consensus_on_the_Use_of_a_New_2019.PDF
- Tamanho:
- 3.13 MB
- Formato:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Descrição:
- publishedVersion (English)