Comparison of different surgical approaches for pediatric cataracts: complications and rates of additional surgery during long-term follow-up
Carregando...
Citações na Scopus
6
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2019
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
HOSPITAL CLINICAS, UNIV SAO PAULO
Autores
Citação
CLINICS, v.74, article ID e966, 5p, 2019
Resumo
OBJECTIVES: To compare long-term postoperative complications of pediatric cataract surgery with primary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation associated with posterior capsulotomy (PC) and anterior vitrectomy (AV) between patients treated with a corneal or pars plicata/pars plana approach. METHODS: Children who underwent cataract surgery with in-the-bag primary IOL implantation were divided into two groups according to PC and AV surgical approach: a corneal approach (group 1) and a pars plicata/pars plana approach (group 2). Only patients with a follow-up duration of more than two years were included. Longterm surgical outcomes were retrospectively reported. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 10.00 +/- 3.13 years. No cases of glaucoma or retinal detachment were reported. The mean age at surgery was 34.57 +/- 22.66 months. Forty-six children were included (27 eyes in group 1 and 29 eyes in group 2). The most frequent postoperative complication was corectopia, followed by visual axis opacification. Both complications occurred more frequently in group 1 (p < 0.001). After cataract surgery, the rate of additional surgeries in group 1 was 51.9%, while in group 2, the rate was 27.6% (p=0.1132). CONCLUSION: The pars plicata/pars plana approach with PC and vitrectomy with primary in-the-bag IOL implantation for pediatric cataracts is a safe procedure.
Palavras-chave
Congenital Cataract, Anterior Vitrectomy, Posterior Capsulotomy, Via pars plicata, Via pars plana, Via Corneal
Referências
- Agarkar S, 2018, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V125, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.07.003
- Astle WF, 2009, J CATARACT REFR SURG, V35, P1216, DOI 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.02.028
- Bhusal S, 2010, CAN J OPHTHALMOL, V45, P531, DOI 10.3129/i10-045
- Cacciatori M, 2006, J CATARACT REFR SURG, V32, P562, DOI 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.01.006
- Chee KYH, 2009, J CATARACT REFR SURG, V35, P720, DOI 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.12.012
- Elkin ZP, 2016, J AAPOS, V20, P506, DOI 10.1016/j.jaapos.2016.06.011
- Hong S, 2009, CAN J OPHTHALMOL, V44, P441, DOI 10.3129/i09-118
- Jensen AA, 2002, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V109, P324, DOI 10.1016/S0161-6420(01)00950-2
- Khatib N, 2017, CAN J OPHTHALMOL, V52, P527, DOI 10.1016/j.jcjo.2017.02.023
- Koch CR, 2018, EYE, V32, P1858, DOI 10.1038/s41433-018-0191-3
- Lemley CA, 2007, RETINA-J RET VIT DIS, V27, P974, DOI 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3180653cf9
- Li SY, 2014, EUR REV MED PHARMACO, V18, P2413
- Liu X, 2016, J OPHTHALMOL, DOI 10.1155/2016/8951053
- Magnusson G, 2000, ACTA OPHTHALMOL SCAN, V78, P65, DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2000.078001065.x
- Memon MN, 2016, PAK J MED SCI, V32, P440, DOI 10.12669/pjms.322.9149
- Nagamoto T, 2015, JPN J OPHTHALMOL, V59, P203, DOI 10.1007/s10384-015-0385-1
- Plager DA, 1997, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V104, P600, DOI 10.1016/S0161-6420(97)30264-4
- Raina UK, 2016, J PEDIAT OPHTH STRAB, V53, P105, DOI 10.3928/01913913-20160208-01
- Ram J, 2003, J CATARACT REFR SURG, V29, P1579, DOI 10.1016/S0886-3350(03)00231-1
- Rowe NA, 2004, BRIT J OPHTHALMOL, V88, P481, DOI 10.1136/bjo.2003.023275
- Sukhija J, 2016, J CATARACT REFR SURG, V42, P1060, DOI 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.04.028
- Tartarella MB, 2017, J AAPOS, V21, P393, DOI [10.1016/j.jaapos.2017.07.203, 10.1016/j.jatzpos.2017.07.203]
- Vasavada AR, 2017, J CATARACT REFR SURG, V43, P1177, DOI 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.07.022